바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기
 

logo

  • P-ISSN1738-3110
  • E-ISSN2093-7717
  • SCOPUS, ESCI

Comparative Analysis of the Competitiveness of the Steel Distribution Industry in Korea and China

The Journal of Distribution Science / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2014, v.12 no.6, pp.21-29
https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.12.6.201406.21
LEE JAE SUNG
Jung Myung Hee

Abstract

Purpose - This research undertakes to understand the competitivenessof the steel distribution industry of both Korea andChina to strengthen Korea-Sino economic cooperation, examinesimpediments to trade between the two countries to analyzecauses which affect trade, and examines improvements in theseareas to identify means of trade expansion. Through this surveyof a defined period, we can identify the structural factors oftrade dependence in the relationship between Korea and China. Research design, data, and methodology - The data werecollected from the Korea Traders Association, the KoreaCustoms Office, and UN Comtrade, from which whole table indexesare calculated. The research methodology uses trade-relatedindexes to focus on analyzing comparative advantagesbased on time-series analysis statistics data (2000–2012) by usingthe analysis index of trade intensity index (TII), the revealedcomparative advantage index (RCA), and the trade specializationindex (TSI). Results - The export ratio for Korea to China was slightlyhigher in 2000 at 2.867, and the export ratio for Korea to Chinawas sustained in 2005. However, it diminished gradually, reaching1.263 in 2012. During the period 2000–2012, the indexeswere maintained without any significant change. However, theystill remain close to –1. In particular, in 2012 it is the closest it has ever been to –1. Therefore, China has a comparative advantagein export specialization. On the other hand, Korea hasa comparative advantage in import specialization. For the researchperiod, all indexes were much lower than 1, whichmeans that Korea has consistently had a comparative disadvantageagainst China for the past 10 years when comparedto other industries, even though it experienced improvement in2000. Conclusions - The summary of conclusions based on empiricalanalysis research are as follows: First, per the trade intensityindex of industries between the two countries, we concludethat the export ratio index in 2000 is 2.867, which meansthe export ratio of Korea to China is slightly higher. Furthermore, the ratios of 2.259 and 1.263 held in 2005 and2012, respectively, meaning that the export ratio of Korea toChina was maintained in 2005, but was diminishing gradually asthe index in 2012 was 1.263. Second, per the trade specializationindex of the steel distribution industry between Koreaand China, the value was –0.379 in 2000, -0.368 in 2005 and-0.568 in 2012. Looking at the whole period of 2000–2012, theindexes remained without any significant change. However, theyare still moving closer to –1. In particular, in 2012 it is the closestit has ever been to –1. Third, regarding the revealed comparativeadvantage index of the steel distribution industry betweenKorea and China, the RCA indexes in 2005 and 2012are 0.246 and 0.306, respectively, which are still far from 1,even though the index has improved compared to the 2000’svalue of 0.0001. Therefore, the Korean steel distribution industryis at a significant comparative disadvantage to that of theChinese steel distribution industry.

keywords
Steel Distribution Industry, Trade Intensity, Trade Structure, Trade Specialization, Revealed Comparative Advantage.

Reference

1.

Ahn, Jong-Seok (1994). Chinese Ship Industry Status and Cooperative ways between Japan and China. Research on Industrial Policies, 94(02), 99-112.

2.

Balance, Robert R. (1988). Trade performance as an Indicators of comparative advantage. Economic Development and International Trade, 25(3), 6-24.

3.

Balassa (1991). A note on Balassa's hypothesis. Atlantic Economic Journal, 19(1), 197-232

4.

Choi, Woo-Young (2011). Progress and Status on Pre-After Japanese Plane Industry. Japanese Language & Culture, 20, 428-450.

5.

Kim, Gwang-Hee (2006). An Empirical Study on Competitiveness Status and countermeasure Strategy against China and Japan. Research on Small & medium Enterprise, 28(3), 30-52.

6.

Lall, Sanjaya, & Manuel, Albaladejo (2004). China’s competitive Performance : A treat to East Asian Manufactured Exports? World Development, 32(9), 1441-1466.

7.

Lee, Chang-Je (2011). From North east Asian Economic Cooperations to East Asian Economic Integration. KIEP Research Review, 11(02), 150-157.

8.

Lee, Hong-Bae (2007). Analysis on Structural Factors about Trade Imbalance Status among Korea, Japan and China. Korea-Japan Economy & Commerce Review, 37(2), 65-72.

9.

Lee, Hong-Bae (2012). Production Network Change and Character between Korean and Japanese Industries. Korea-Japan Economy & Commerce Review, 3, 25-29.

10.

Lim, Cheon-Seok, & Lee, Woo-Gwang (1997). Structural Change on East Asian Economy and Ways on Economic Cooperations between Korea and Japan. Korea-Japan Economy & Commerce Review, 14, 225-232.

11.

Mizuno, Junko (2010). A study on Korea against Japan trade deficit. Asia Economy Review, 5, 45-59

12.

Oh, Dong-Yun(2012). Analysis on intermediary goods’ manufacturing technology structure and trade dependence relationship between Korea and China. Research on North East Asian Economy, 24(3), 85-93.

13.

Song, Young-Uk (2009). Influence that Korean Japanese origin image make Chinese consumer’s brand character and purchase intention. Research on Industrial Economy, 22(5), 2512-2522.

14.

Uchida, Yoko (2008). Vertical Specialization in East Asia: Some Evidence from East Asia Using Asian International Input-Output Tables from 1975 to 2000. Journal of Developing Economies, 7, 3-28.

15.

Uncomtrade (2012). 2012 Annual Statistics Reports, NewYork, USA. Retrieved from http://comtrade.un.org/db/dqQuickQuery.aspx

16.

WTO (2012). 2012 Annual Statistics Reports, NewYork, USA. Retrieved from http://www.wto.org/english/res_e/statis_e/its2013_e/its13

17.

Yamazawa, I. (2010). Intensity Analysis of World Trade Flow. Histotsubashi Journal of Economics, 2, 212-221.

18.

Yu, Jun, & Han, Gi-Jo (2012). A Study on Trade Structure of Steel Industry between China and Japan. Journal of Economy & Commerce, 56(0), 111-127.

The Journal of Distribution Science