바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기
 

logo

  • P-ISSN1738-3110
  • E-ISSN2093-7717
  • SCOPUS, ESCI

The Effect of Brand Familiarity on Green Claim Skepticism in Distribution Channel

The Journal of Distribution Science / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2023, v.21 no.6, pp.51-68
https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.21.06.202306.51
KASSIE Belay Addisu
Rhee,Hyongjae

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to explore the impact of green products’ claim skepticism on green purchase intention and further investigates the moderating role of environmental concern in the relationship. This study, by drawing the persuasion knowledge model expected that ambiguity avoidance penalizes less familiar brands than familiar brands. Further, the present study building on Hofstede’s cultural dimension, specifically, uncertainty avoidance, undertook a scenario to understand any difference that exist between uncertainty avoidance cultural groups. This study also investigates gender differences in green claim skepticism and proclivity to purchase green products. Research design, data, and methodology: For analyzing the relationship relevant hypotheses were designed, and R-programming software was used. To test the hypotheses two independent sample t-test and regression analysis were carried out. Results: The results suggest that consumers’ skepticism toward green claims influenced the intention to purchase eco-friendly products. The study finding also confirms the effect is moderated by environmental concern. Also, the findings of two scenarios reveal that consumers in high uncertainty avoidance culture exhibited a greater level of skepticism for green print advertising and green packaging claims when the brand in the advertising and packaging was unfamiliar than when it was familiar. Conclusions: To alter the negative effect of skepticism the consumer should believe the environmental claims are valid so that they can contribute to solving sustainability issues.

keywords
Green Claim Skepticism in Distribution, Uncertainty Avoidance, Environmental Concern in Distribution Channel, Distribution Strategy of Green Products

Reference

1.

Ahadzadeh, A. S., Ong, F. S., & Wu, S. L. (2021). Social media skepticism and belief in conspiracy theories about COVID-19: the moderating role of the dark triad. Current Psychology.

2.

Albayrak, T., Aksoy, Ş., & Caber, M. (2013). The effect of environmental concern and scepticism on green purchase behaviour. Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 31(1), 27–39.

3.

Amawate, V., & Deb, M. (2019). Cause Related Marketing and Customer Skepticism : A Study of Situational and Psychological Skepticism. Theoretical Economics Letters, 9, 834–851.

4.

Amawate, V., & Deb, M. (2021). Antecedents and consequences of consumer skepticism toward cause-related marketing: Gender as moderator and attitude as mediator. Journal of Marketing Communications, 27(1), 31–52.

5.

Atkinson, L., & Kim, Y. (2015). “I drink it anyway and i know i shouldn’t”: Understanding green consumers’ positive evaluations of norm-violating non-green products and misleading green advertising. Environmental Communication, 9(1), 37–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2014.932817

6.

Avery, J. (2012). Defending the markers of masculinity: Consumer resistance to brand gender-bending. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 29(4), 322–336.

7.

Bae, M. (2018). Overcoming skepticism toward cause-related marketing claims: the role of consumers’ attributions and a temporary state of skepticism. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 35(2), 194–207.

8.

Bae, M. (2020). Role of Skepticism and Message Elaboration in Determining Consumers’ Response to Cause-Related Marketing Claims on Facebook Brand Pages. Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 41(3), 301–331.

9.

Bamberg Sebastian. (2003). How does environmental concern influence specific environmentally related behaviors? A new answer to an old question. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23(1), 21–32.

10.

Berlyne, D. E. (1970). Novelty, complexity, and hedonic value. Perception & Psychophysics, 8(5), 279–286.

11.

Berney-Reddish, I. A., & Areni, C. S. (2006). Sex differences in responses to probability markers in advertising claims. Journal of Advertising, 35(2), 7–16.

12.

Bhaduri, G. (2020). Expectations matter: Evaluation of brand’s pro-environmental initiatives based on consumers’ brand schemas and brand familiarity. Journal of Global Fashion Marketing, 11(1), 37–55.

13.

Bhaduri, G., & Copeland, L. (2021). Going green? How skepticism and information transparency influence consumers’ brand evaluations for familiar and unfamiliar brands. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 25(1), 80–98.

14.

Bjørner, T. B., Hansen, L. G., & Russell, C. S. (2004). Environmental labeling and consumers’ choice - An empirical analysis of the effect of the Nordic Swan. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 47(3), 411–434.

15.

Boush, D. M., Friestad, M., & Rose, G. M. (1994). Adolescent Skepticism toward TV Advertising and Knowledge of Advertiser Tactics. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(1), 165.

16.

Branscombe, N. R., Spears, R., Ellemers, N., & Doosje, B. (2002). Intragroup and intergroup evaluation effects on group behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(6), 744–753.

17.

Brough, A. R., Wilkie, J. E. B., Ma, J., Isaac, M. S., & Gal, D. (2016). The green-feminine stereotype and its effect on sustainable consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 43(4), 567–582.

18.

Catalán, S., Martínez, E., & Wallace, E. (2019). Analysing mobile advergaming effectiveness: the role of flow, game repetition and brand familiarity. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 28(4), 502–514.

19.

Chandler, J., & Schwarz, N. (2010). Use does not wear ragged the fabric of friendship: Thinking of objects as alive makes people less willing to replace them. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20(2), 138–145.

20.

Chen, C. Y., Kearney, M., & Chang, S. L. (2021). Belief in or Identification of False News According to the Elaboration Likelihood Model. International Journal of Communication, 15(108), 1263–1285.

21.

Copeland, L., & Bhaduri, G. (2020). Consumer relationship with pro-environmental apparel brands: effect of knowledge, skepticism and brand familiarity. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 29(1), 1–14.

22.

Dagher, G. K., Itani, O., & Kassar, A. N. (2015). The Impact of Environment Concern and Attitude on Green Purchasing Behavior: Gender as The Moderator. Contemporary Management Research, 11(2), 179–206.

23.

Dahlén, M., & Lange, F. (2004). To Challenge or Not to Challenge: Ad-Brand Incongruency and Brand Familiarity. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 12(3), 20–35.

24.

Dahlén, M., Rosengren, S., Törn, F., & Ö hman, N. (2008). Could placing ads wrong be right? Advertising effects of thematic incongruence. Journal of Advertising, 37(3), 57–67.

25.

Dhanesh, G. S., & Nekmat, E. (2019). Facts Over Stories for Involved Publics: Framing Effects in CSR Messaging and the Roles of Issue Involvement, Message Elaboration, Affect, and Skepticism. Management Communication Quarterly, 33(1), 7– 38.

26.

Do Paço, A. M. F., & Reis, R. (2012). Factors affecting skepticism toward green advertising. Journal of Advertising, 41(4), 147– 155.

27.

Donato, C. (2021). Disgust and preference for familiar brands. Italian Journal of Marketing, 2021(1–2), 5–23.

28.

DURMAZ, G., SUHER, H. K., & BIR, C. S. (2015). Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM) In Print Advertisements: A Content Analysis of Advertisements Which Is Positioned In Special and General Interest Magazines. Journal of Yaşar University, 11(41), 45.

29.

Ereaut, G., & Segnit, N. (2006). Warm Words How are we telling the climate story and can we tell it better ? Public Policy Research, 2006(August), 32.

30.

Fischer, R., & Derham, C. (2016). Is in-group bias culturedependent? A meta-analysis across 18 societies. SpringerPlus, 5(1), 1–9.

31.

Friestad, M., & Wright, P. (1994). The Persuasion Knowledge Model: How People Cope with Persuasion Attempts. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(1), 1.

32.

Fujii, S. (2006). Environmental concern, attitude toward frugality, and ease of behavior as determinants of pro-environmental behavior intentions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 26(4), 262–268.

33.

Gheorghe, C. A., & Matefi, R. (2021). Sustainability and transparency—necessary conditions for the transition from fast to slow fashion: Zara join life collection’s analysis. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(19).

34.

Ginder, W. A. (2016). An Attribution Theory Approach to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Communication: Consumer Response to Consistency-Based CSR Positioning. 1–224.

35.

Goh, S. K., & Balaji, M. S. (2016). Linking green skepticism to green purchase behavior. Journal of Cleaner Production, 131, 629–638.

36.

Golonka, K., & Gulla, B. (2021). Individual Differences and Susceptibility to Burnout Syndrome: Sensory Processing Sensitivity and Its Relation to Exhaustion and Disengagement. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(November), 1–15.

37.

Golovacheva, K. (2016). When Consumers Activate Persuasion Knowledge: Review of Antecedents and Consequences. 5, 1–21.

38.

Griffin, R. J., Neuwirth, K., Giese, J., & Dunwoody, S. (2002). Linking the heuristic-systematic model and depth of processing. Communication Research, 29(6), 705-732+733.

39.

Hardesty, D. M., Carlson, J. P., & Bearden, W. O. (2002). Brand familiarity and invoice price effects on consumer evaluations: The moderating role of skepticism toward advertising. Journal of Advertising, 31(2), 1–15.

40.

Herédia-Colaço, V., Coelho do Vale, R., & Villas-Boas, S. B. (2019). Does Fair Trade Breed Contempt? A Cross-Country Examination on the Moderating Role of Brand Familiarity and Consumer Expertise on Product Evaluation. Journal of Business Ethics, 156(3), 737–758.

41.

Higgins, E. T. (2006). Value from hedonic experience and engagement. Psychological Review, 113(3), 439–460. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.113.3.439

42.

Hofstede, G. (2011). Hofstede 2011.Pdf. Dimensionalizing Cultures : The Hofstede Models in Context, 2, 1–26.

43.

Hutchinson, J. W., & Alba, J. W. (1991). Ignoring Irrelevant Information: Situational Determinants of Consumer Learning. Journal of Consumer Research, 18(3), 325.

44.

Hwang, J. A., Park, Y., & Kim, Y. (2016). Why do consumers respond to eco-labels? The case of Korea. SpringerPlus, 5(1), 1–13.

45.

Johnson, M., & Pigliucci, M. (2004). Is knowledge of science associated with higher skepticism of pseudoscientific claims? American Biology Teacher, 66(8), 536–549.

46.

Joshi, Y., & Rahman, Z. (2015). Factors Affecting Green Purchase Behaviour and Future Research Directions. International Strategic Management Review, 3(1–2), 128–143.

47.

Kent, R. J., & Allen, C. T. (1994). Competitive Interference Effects in Consumer Memory for Advertising: The Role of Brand Familiarity. Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 97.

48.

Koenig-Lewis, N., Palmer, A., Dermody, J., & Urbye, A. (2014). Consumers’ evaluations of ecological packaging - Rational and emotional approaches. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 37, 94–105.

49.

Kreczmańska-Gigol, K., & Gigol, T. (2022). The Impact of Consumers’ Green Skepticism on the Purchase of EnergyEfficient and Environmentally Friendly Products. Energies, 15(6), 1–12.

50.

Kumar, A. (2018). Consumer Skepticism towards Advertising on Television Media. Journal of Accounting & Marketing, 07(02), 2–5.

51.

Laroche, M., Kim, C., & Zhou, L. (1996). Brand familiarity and confidence as determinants of purchase intention: An empirical test in a multiple brand context. Journal of Business Research, 37(2), 115–120.

52.

Latif, K., Pitafi, A. H., Malik, M. Y., & Latif, Z. (2019). Individual Cultural Values and Consumer Animosity: Chinese Consumers’ Attitude Toward American Products. SAGE Open, 9(3).

53.

Lee, J. (2017). Green Consumers? Skepticism toward ProEnvironmental Advertising_.

54.

Lee, K. (2008). Opportunities for green marketing: Young consumers. Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 26(6), 573– 586.

55.

Leire, C., & Thidell, Å . (2005). Product-related environmental information to guide consumer purchases - A review and analysis of research on perceptions, understanding and use among Nordic consumers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 13(10–11), 1061–1070.

56.

Leonidou, C. N., & Skarmeas, D. (2017). Gray Shades of Green: Causes and Consequences of Green Skepticism. Journal of Business Ethics, 144(2), 401–415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2829-4

57.

Liu, W., Zeng, L., & Wang, Q. (2021). Psychological Distance Toward Air Pollution and Purchase Intention for New Energy Vehicles: An Investigation in China. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(April), 1–13.

58.

Lorenzoni, I., Nicholson-Cole, S., & Whitmarsh, L. (2007). Barriers perceived to engaging with climate change among the UK public and their policy implications. Global Environmental Change, 17(3–4), 445–459.

59.

Loureiro, M. L., & Lotade, J. (2005). Do fair trade and eco-labels in coffee wake up the consumer conscience? Ecological Economics, 53(1), 129–138. lim

60.

Maass, A., Cadinu, M., Guarnieri, G., & Grasselli, A. (2003). Sexual Harassment under Social Identity Threat: The Computer Harassment Paradigm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(5), 853–870.

61.

Magnier, L., & Schoormans, J. (2015). Consumer reactions to sustainable packaging: The interplay of visual appearance, verbal claim and environmental concern. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 44, 53–62.

62.

Majhi, R. (2022). Behavior and perception of younger generation towards green products. Journal of Public Affairs, 22(1).

63.

Mangleburg, T. F., & Bristol, T. (1998). Socialization and adolescents’ skepticism toward advertising. Journal of Advertising, 27(3), 11–21.

64.

Matthes, J., & Wonneberger, A. (2014). The skeptical green consumer revisited: Testing the relationship between green consumerism and skepticism toward advertising. Journal of Advertising, 43(2), 115–127.

65.

Migheli, M. (2021). Green purchasing: the effect of parenthood and gender. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23(7), 10576–10600.

66.

Morrell, K., & Jayawardhena, C. (2010). Fair trade, ethical decision making and the narrative of gender difference. Business Ethics, 19(4), 393–407.

67.

Munsch, C. L. (2012). Gender identity threat and compensation in young American men. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, May, 209.

68.

Newton, J. D., Tsarenko, Y., Ferraro, C., & Sands, S. (2015). Environmental concern and environmental purchase intentions: The mediating role of learning strategy. Journal of Business Research, 68(9), 1974–1981.

69.

Nicole Sullivan. (2023). An Overview of Considerations for Companies at Any Stage. Carbon Better: SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING.

70.

Obermiller, C., Spangenberg, E., & MacLachlan, D. L. (2005). Ad skepticism: The consequences of disbelief. Journal of Advertising, 34(3), 7–17.

71.

Pickett-Baker, J., & Ozaki, R. (2008). Pro-environmental products: Marketing influence on consumer purchase decision. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 25(5), 281–293.

72.

Rhee, E. S., & Jung, W. S. (2019). Brand familiarity as a moderating factor in the ad and brand attitude relationship and advertising appeals. Journal of Marketing Communications, 25(6), 571–585.

73.

Roberts, J. A., & Bacon, D. R. (1997). Exploring the Subtle Relationships between Environmental Concern and Ecologically Conscious Consumer Behavior. Journal of Business Research, 40(1), 79–89.

74.

Rose, J., Cho, E., & Smith, K. R. (2016). The Effects of Brand Familiarity on Perceived Risks, Attitudes, and Purchase Intentions toward Intimate Apparel Brand. International Textile and Apparel Association, November, 24–26.

75.

Samsung. (2020). Samsung Electronics Sustainability Report 2020. Samsung Electronics , 5–15.

76.

Schmuck, D., Matthes, J., & Naderer, B. (2018). Misleading Consumers with Green Advertising? An Affect–Reason– Involvement Account of Greenwashing Effects in Environmental Advertising. Journal of Advertising, 47(2), 127–145.

77.

Showkat, D., & Grimm, C. (2018). Identifying Gender Differences in Information Processing Style, Self-efficacy, and Tinkering for Robot Tele-operation. 2018 15th International Conference on Ubiquitous Robots, UR 2018, 443–448.

78.

Skarmeas, D., & Leonidou, C. N. (2013). When consumers doubt, Watch out! The role of CSR skepticism. Journal of Business Research, 66(10), 1831–1838.

79.

Söderlund, M. (2002). Customer Familiarity and Its Effects on Satisfaction and Behavioral Intentions. Psychology and Marketing, 19(10), 861–879.

80.

Sundström, A., & Mccright, A. M. (2013). Examining gender differences in environmental concern across four levels of the swedish polity. June, 1–33.

81.

Swim, J. K., Gillis, A. J., & Hamaty, K. J. (2020). Gender Bending and Gender Conformity: The Social Consequences of Engaging in Feminine and Masculine Pro-Environmental Behaviors. Sex Roles, 82(5–6), 363–385.

82.

Syadzwina, M. N., & Astuti, R. D. (2021). Linking green skepticism to green purchase behavior on personal care products in Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 716(1).

83.

Tam, J. L. m. (2008). Brand familiarity: Its effects on satisfaction evaluations. Journal of Services Marketing, 22(1), 3–12.

84.

Tam, K. P., & Chan, H. W. (2017). Environmental concern has a weaker association with pro-environmental behavior in some societies than others: A cross-cultural psychology perspective. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 53, 213–223.

85.

Tam, K. P., & Chan, H. W. (2018). Generalized trust narrows the gap between environmental concern and pro-environmental behavior: Multilevel evidence. Global Environmental Change, 48(November 2017), 182–194.

86.

Taylor, D. C., & Barber, N. (2012). Measuring the Influence of Persuasion Marketing on Young Wine Consumers. Journal of Food Products Marketing, 18(1), 19–33.

87.

Todd Rogers, & Michael I.Norton. (2009). Association for Consumer Research. Advances in Consumer Research, 36, 23– 24.

88.

Tyson, A., Kennedy, B., & Funk, C. (2021). Gen Z, Millennials Stand Out for Climate Change Activism, Social Media Engagement With Issue. Pew Research Center, May, 1–100.

89.

Ulusoy, E., & Barretta, P. G. (2016). How green are you, really? Consumers’ skepticism toward brands with green claims. Journal of Global Responsibility, 7(1), 72–83.

90.

Vainio, A., & Paloniemi, R. (2014). The complex role of attitudes toward science in pro-environmental consumption in the Nordic countries. Ecological Economics, 108(2014), 18–27.

91.

Van Liere, K. D., & Dunlap, R. E. (1978). Moral Norms and Environmental Behavior: An Application of Schwartz’s Norm‐ Activation Model to Yard Burning. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 8(2), 174–188.

92.

Winter, A. (2012). FACTORS AFFECTING SKEPTICISM TOWARD GREEN ADVERTISING Author ( s ): Arminda Maria Finisterra do Paço and Rosa Reis Source : Journal of Advertising , Winter 2012 , Vol . 41 , No . 4 , Special Issue on Green REFERENCES Linked references are available on JST. 41(4), 147–155.

93.

Yu, J. (2020). Consumer responses toward green advertising: The effects of gender, advertising skepticism, and green motive attribution. Journal of Marketing Communications, 26(4), 414–433.

94.

Zhao, Z., Gong, Y., Li, Y., Zhang, L., & Sun, Y. (2021). GenderRelated Beliefs, Norms, and the Link With Green Consumption. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(December), 1–13.

The Journal of Distribution Science