바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기
 

logo

  • P-ISSN1738-3110
  • E-ISSN2093-7717
  • SCOPUS, ESCI

Determinants of The Level of Information Distribution on Financial Statement

The Journal of Distribution Science / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2023, v.21 no.6, pp.91-97
https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.21.06.202306.91
NGUYEN Van Thi Hong (Academy of Finance)
PHAM Anh Phuong (Academy of Finance)

Abstract

Purpose: Interim financial statements provide timely and qualified financial information for users. Hence, the importance of the interim financial statement is increasingly noticeable among information users. This research studies determinants of interim financial statements disclosure in Vietnamese-listed enterprises. Research design, data and methodology: The sample is 55 enterprises listed in VNIndex and is in the list of Forbes top 100 largest companies in 2020. Data was collected from interim financial statements for four years, from 2018 to 2021. GMM is used in this study. Results: The regression analysis results show that reporting lag has a positive impact on the level of information distribution of interim financial reporting; companies audited by BIG4 tend to have a higher level of information disclosure. The higher the return on assets, the more disclosure is made; the larger the company size, the greater the disclosure level. Owner equity structure and Leverage do not affect the disclosure level of interim financial reporting. Conclusions: The information disclosure level on the interim financial statement should be improved to increase transparency. In addition to continuing to encourage these companies to provide more information voluntarily, government authorities should have effective regulations to require sufficient information disclosure from other listed companies.

keywords
Information Distribution, Financial Report, Financial Statement, Interim Report, Interim Financial Statement, Disclosure

Reference

1.

Abd-Elsalam, O. H., & Weetman, P. (2003). Introducing International Accounting Standards to an emerging capital market: relative familiarity and language effect in Egypt. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 12(1), 63-84.

2.

Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. The review of economic studies, 58(2), 277-297.

3.

Biaek-Jaworska, A., & Matusiewicz, A. (2015). Determinants of the level of information disclosure in financial statements prepared following IFRS. Accounting and Management Information Systems, 14(3), 453.

4.

Cazier, R. A., & Pfeiffer, R. J. (2016). Why are 10-K Filings So Long? Accounting Horizons, 30(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.2308/ACCH-51240

5.

Cazier, R. A., & Pfeiffer, R. J. (2017). 10-K Disclosure Repetition and Managerial Reporting Incentives. Journal of Financial Reporting, 2(1), 107–131. https://doi.org/10.2308/JFIR-51912

6.

Chambers, A. E., & Penman, S. H. (1984). Timeliness of reporting and the stock price reaction to earnings announcements. Journal of accounting research, 1(1), 21-47.

7.

Hassan, O. A., Giorgioni, G., & Romilly, P. (2006). The extent of financial disclosure and its determinants in an emerging capital market: the case of Egypt. International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation, 3(1), 41-67.

8.

Huddart, S., Ke, B., & Shi, C. (2007). Jeopardy, non-public information, and insider trading around SEC 10-K and 10-Q lings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 43(1), 3–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JACCECO.2006.06.003

9.

Li, F. (2008). Annual report readability, current earnings, and earnings persistence. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 45(2), 221–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JACCECO.2008.02.003

10.

Lim, E. K. Y., Chalmers, K., & Hanlon, D. (2018). The influence of business strategy on annual report readability. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 37(1), 65–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JACCPUBPOL.2018.01.003

11.

Loughran, T., & Mcdonald, B. (2014). Measuring Readability in Financial Disclosures. The Journal of Finance, 69(4), 1643– 1671. https://doi.org/10.1111/JOFI.12162

12.

Marston, C., & Polei, A. (2004). Corporate reporting on the Internet by German companies. International journal of Accounting Information systems, 5(3), 285-311.

13.

Raedy, K. M., & Helms, G. L. (2002). CPA involvement with quarterly financial reporting. Ohio CPA Journal, 1(1), 50-53.

14.

Skinner, D. J. (1994). Why firms voluntarily disclose bad news. Journal of accounting research, 32(1), 38-60.

15.

Wallace, R. S. O., & Cooke, T. E. (1990). Nonresponse bias in mail accounting surveys: a pedagogical extension. The British Accounting Review, 22(3), 283-288.

16.

Wallace, R.S.O. and Naser, K. (1995). Firm-Specific Determinants of the Comprehensiveness of Mandatory Disclosure in the Corporate Annual Reports of Firms Listed on the Stock Exchange of Hong Kong, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 14 (4), 311-368

17.

Williams, K. (2008). How useful are financial reports?. Strategic Finance, 1(1), 21-23.

18.

You, H., & Zhang, X. (2008). Financial reporting complexity and investor underreaction to 10-K information. Review of Accounting Studies, 14(4), 559–586. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11142-008-9083-2

The Journal of Distribution Science