바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기
 

logo

  • P-ISSN1738-3110
  • E-ISSN2093-7717
  • SCOPUS, ESCI

Distribution and Evaluation of News on Portals: How News Use and Engagement Influence Portal News Credibility

The Journal of Distribution Science / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2023, v.21 no.7, pp.1-9
https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.21.07.202307.1
Jun, Najin

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to understand if heterogeneous news is evenly consumed and distributed on portals as it examines people’s news use and engagement behaviors and news credibility. Focusing on the four behaviors of news use, i.e., viewing news by keyword search, viewing news from subscribed sources, viewing news from the list of most-viewed news, and reading comments, and the three behaviors of news engagement, i.e., sharing news, ‘liking’ or ‘recommending’ news, and posting comments, this study investigates the relation between each of the behaviors and portal news credibility. Research design, data and methodology: From 2022 News Audience Survey in Korea, this study conducts a regression analysis to investigate the relations between each behavior and news credibility. Results: The results show a positive relation for the former two news use behaviors and the latter two news engagement behaviors, and a negative relation for the latter two news use behaviors. Conclusions: The positive relations between active news use and engagement behaviors and portal news credibility indicate that news consumers are more likely to use and engage in attitude-consistent news rather than attitude-challenging news, implying that heterogeneous news is less likely to be consumed and distributed evenly on portals across all news users.

keywords
Distribution of News, Portal News, Credibility, News Use, News Engagement

Reference

1.

Chung, C. J., Nam, Y., Stefanone, M. A. (2012). Exploring online news credibility: The relative influence of traditional and technological factors. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17, 171-186. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083- 6101.2011.01565.x

2.

Conlin, L., & Roberts, C. (2016). Presence of online reader comments lowers news site credibility. Newspaper Research Journal, 37(4), 365-376. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739532916677056

3.

Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.

4.

Flanagin, A. J., & Metzger, M. J. (2000). Perceptions of Internet information credibility. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 77(3), 515-540. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900007700304

5.

Flanagin, A. J., & Metzger, M. J. (2003). The perceived credibility of personal web page information as influenced by the sex of the source. Computers in Human Behavior, 19(6), 683-701. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0747-5632(03)00021-9

6.

Fletcher, R., & Park, S. (2017). The impact of trust n the news media on online news consumption and participation. Digital Journalism, 5(10), 1281-1299. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1279979

7.

Garrett, R. K., (2009). Echo chambers online? Political motivated selective exposure among internet news users. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14, 262-285. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01440.x

8.

Gaziano, C., & McGrath, K. (1986). Measuring the concept of credibility. Journalism Quarterly, 63(3), 451-462. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769908606300301

9.

Gunther, A. C. (1992). Biased press or biased public? Attitudes toward media coverage of social groups. Public Opinion Quarterly, 56(2), 147-167. https://doi.org/10.1086/269308

10.

Ha, S., & Lee, J.-G. (2011). Impacts of the amount and contents type of media use on media trust: Across the traditional and new media. Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies, 55(1), 413-434.

11.

Habermas, J. (1989). “The Public Sphere”, in Bronner, S. E., & Kellner, D. (eds.), Critical Theory and Society: A Reader. New York: Routledge.

12.

Harrison, J. (2006). News. Abington: Routledge.

13.

Hong, S., & Cameron, G. T. (2018). Will comments change your opinion? The persuasion effects of online comments and heuristic cues in crisis communication. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 26(1), 173-182. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.12215

14.

Hopmann, N. N., Shehata, A., & Stӧmbӓck, J. (2015). Contagious media effects: How media use and exposure to game-framed news influence media trust. Mass Communication and Society, 18, 776-798. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2015.1022190

15.

Ibelema, M., & Powell, L. (2001). Cable television news viewed as most credible. Newspaper Research Journal, 22(1), 41-51. https://doi.org/10.1177/073953290102200104

16.

Johnson, T. J., & Kaye, B. K. (1998). Cruising is believing?: Comparing Internet and traditional sources on media credibility measures. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 75(2), 325-340. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769909807500208

17.

Johnson, T. J., & Kaye, B. K. (2002). Webelievability: A path model examining how convenience and reliance predict online credibility. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 79(3), 619-642. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900207900306

18.

Johnson, T. J., & Kaye, B. K. (2009). In blog we trust? Deciphering credibility of components of the internet among politically interested Internet users. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(1), 175-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.08.004

19.

Kahan, D. M., Braman, D., Slovic, P., Gastil, J., & Cohen, G. L. (2009). Cultural cognition of the risks and benefits of nanotechnology. Nature Nanotechnology, 4, 87-91. https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2008.341

20.

Knobloch-Westerwick, S., & Meng, J. (2009). Looking the other way: Selective exposure to attitude-consistent and counterattitudinal political information. Communication Research, 36, 426-448. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650209333030

21.

Korea Press Foundation. (2022). Media Users in Korea 2022. Seoul: Korea Press Foundation.

22.

Kohring, M., & Matthes, J. (2007). Trust in news media: Development and validation of a mutidimentional scale. Communication Research, 34(2), 231-252. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650206298071

23.

Ladd, J. (2012). Why Americans hate the media and how it matters: Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

24.

Lee, H., & Ahn, J. (2017). The differences in factors influencing portal news and news site application usages on smartphones: Focusing on political discussion networks, news media use and news genre consumption. International Journal of Contents, 13(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.5392/IJoC.2017.13.1.001

25.

Lischka, J. A., & Messerli, M. (2016). Examining the benefits of audience integration: Does sharing of or commenting on online news enhance the loyalty of online readers? Digital Journalism, 4(5), 597-620. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2015.1068128

26.

Meyer, P. (1988). Defining and measuring credibility of newspapers: Developing and index. Journalism Quarterly, 65, 567-587. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769908806500301

27.

Meyer, H. K., Marchionno, D., & Miller, R. (2010). The journalist behind the news: Credibility of straight, collaborative, opinionated, and blogged “news.” American Behavioral Scientist, 54, 100-119. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764210376313

28.

Metzger, M. J., Hartsell, E. H., & Flanagin, A. J. (2020). Cognitive dissonance or credibility? A comparison of two theoretical explanations for selective exposure to partisan news. Communication Research, 47(1), 3-28. http://doi.org/10.1177/0093650215613136

29.

Mulder, R. (1980). Media credibility: A use-gratifications approach. Journalism Quarterly, 57(3), 474-477. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769908005700315

30.

Nah, S., & Yamamoto, M. (2019). Communication and citizenship revisited: Theorizing communication and citizen journalism practice as civic participation. Communication Theory, 29(1), 24-45. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qty019

31.

O’Keefe, D. J. (2002). Persuasion: Theory and Research (vol. 2). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

32.

Oyedeji, T. A. (2010). The credible brand model: The effects of ideological congruency and customer-based brand equity on news credibility. American Behavioral Scientist, 54(2), 83-99. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764210376312

33.

Pjesivac, I., & Rui, R. (2014). Anonymous sources hurt credibility of news stories across culture: A compative experiment in America and China. International Communication Gazette, 76(8), 641-660. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048514548534

34.

Pjesivac, I., Spasovska, K., & Imre, I. (2016). The truth between the lines: Conceptualization of trust in news media in Serbia, Madedonia, and Croatia. Mass Communication & Society. 19(3), 323-351. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2015.1128548

35.

Rossenberry, J. (2005). Few Papers use online techniques to improve public communication. Newspaper Research Journal, 26, 61-73. https://doi.org/10.1177/073953290502600406

36.

Schweigner, W. (2000). Media credibility – Experience or image? A survey of the World Wide Web in Germany in comparison to other media. European Journal of Communication, 15(1), 37-59. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323100015001002

37.

Stroud, N. J. (2008). Media use and political predispositions: Revisiting the concept of selective exposure. Political Behavior, 30, 341-366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-007- 9050-9

38.

Stroud, N. J. (2010). Polarization and partisan selective exposure. Journal of Communication, 60(3), 556-576. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01497.x

39.

Thurman, N. (2011). Making ‘The daily Me’: Technology, economics and habit in the mainstream assimilation of personalized news. Journalism, 12(4), 395-415. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884910388228

40.

Tsfati, Y., & Arely, G. (2014). Individual and contextual correlates of trust in media across 44 countries. Communication Research, 41(6), 760-782. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650213485972

41.

Waddell, T. F. (2018). What does the crowd think? How online comments and popularity metrics affect news credibility and issue importance. New Media & Society, 24(2), 150-166. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817742905

The Journal of Distribution Science