바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기
 
 

logo

메뉴

치과병원 원내생 진료실을 경험한 환자에 대한 질적 연구

A qualitative study on patients’ experience of participating in predoctoral treatment center

Abstract

Although the predoctoral treatment center is crucial for the training of dentists, they often face the chronic issue of lim ited patient supply. To address this problem, various measures have been proposed. This study employs grounded theory to examine qualitative data and aims to activate the predoctoral treatment center by targeting patients who have undergone treatment by predoctoral students. Specifically, the study seeks to identify how patients who received treatment by predoc toral students initially sought treatment, their positive and negative experiences during treatment, and the factors that either hindered or facilitated the predoctoral treatment center. Based on these findings, the study provides implications for revital izing the predoctoral treatment center and suggests potential areas for future research.

keywords
the predoctoral treatment center, experience of patients, grounded theory, qualitative research

참고문헌

1.

1. 리처드 세넷 지음. 김홍식 옮김. 장인: 현대문명이 잃어버린 생각하는손. 21세기 북스. 2010.

2.

2. Henzi D, Davis E, Jasinevicius R, Hendricson W. North American dental students’ perspectives about their clinical education. J Dent Educ 2006; 70(4): 361-377. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.0022-0337.2006.70.4.tb04091.x

3.

3. Plasschaert A, Holbrook W, Delap E, Martinez C, Walmsley A. Profile and competences for the European dentist. Eur J Dent Educ 2005; 9(3): 98-107. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0579.2005.00369.x

4.

4. Yip H, Smales R. Review of competency-based education in dentistry. Brit Dent J 2000; 189(6): 324-326. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4800758.

5.

5. Kalkwarf K, Haden N, Valachovic R. ADEA commission on change and innovation in dental education. J Dent Educ 2005;69(10): 1085. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.0022-0337.2005.69.10.tb04008.x

6.

6. Lee K. Legal and institutional improvements for revitalization of the predoctoral student clinic. Kor J Dent Educ 2010; 3(1): 5-13.

7.

7. 김상혁, ”원내생의 가장 큰 고민”, 치의신보, 2020.12.9, https://www.dailydental.co.kr/news/article.html?no=113686.

8.

8. Humphris G, Blinkhorn A, Freeman R, Gorter R, Hoad-Reddick G, Murtomaa H, Splieth C. Psychological stress in undergraduate dental students: baseline results from seven European dental schools. Eur J Dent Educ 2002; 6(1), 22-29. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0579.2002.060105.x

9.

9. 김경준, “치과병원 원내생 진료 수가 적절한가?”, 치과신문, 2017.11.2, http://www.dentalnews.or.kr/news/article.html?no=19929

10.

10. Kwon H. Understanding ground theory. Kor Policy Science Review 2016; 20(2): 181-216.

11.

11. Patton M. Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbery Park, CA: Sage Publications. 1990.

12.

12. Strauss A, Corbin, J. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. 1998.

13.

13. Byun K, Kim H. Critical Reflection for Progressive Utilization of Grounded Theory Approach in Korea Educational Studies: Focusing on the Coding Paradigm of Strauss and Corbin. Kor Educ Review 2020; 26(3): 109-138.

14.

14. Bang O, Sung J, Kim D. A Study on the survey of primary dental care clinic for dental students. J Kor Acad Oral Health 1995;19(1):103-122.

15.

15. Klaassen H, Dukes K, Marchini L. Patient satisfaction with dental treatment at a university dental clinic: A qualitative analysis. J Dent Educ 2021; 85(3), 311-321. https://doi.org/10.1002/jdd.12428.

16.

16. Park S, Timothé P, Nalliah R, Karimbux N, Howell T. A case completion curriculum for clinical dental education: replacing numerical requirements with patient-based comprehensive care. J Dent Educ 2011; 75(11), 1411-1416. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.0022-0337.2011.75.11.tb05197.x

17.

17. Park S. Ten-year follow-up of patient-centered comprehensive care using case completion curriculum. J Dent Educ 2021;85(8), 1408-1414. https://doi.org/10.1002/jdd.12607.

18.

18. Gadbury-Amyot C, Overman P. Implementation of portfolios as a programmatic global assessment measure in dental education. J Dent Educ 2018; 82(6), 557-564. https://doi.org/10.21815/JDE.018.062.

19.

19. Ali K, Tredwin C, Kay E, Slade A. Stakeholders’ Perceptions About a Newly Established Dental School with a Problem-Based, Student-Led, Patient-Centered Curriculum: A Qualitative Study. J Dent Educ 2016; 80(3), 291-300. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.0022-0337.2016.80.3.tb06084.x

20.

20. Weinstein P, Smith T, Bartlett R. A study of the dental studentpatient relationship. J Dent Research, 1973; 52(6), 1287-1292. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345730520062201.

21.

21. Goh E, Beech N, Johnson N. Dental anxiety in adult patients treated by dental students: a systematic review. J Dent Educ 2020; 84(7), 805-811. https://doi.org/10.1002/jdd.12173.

22.

22. Hottel T, Hardigan P. Improvement in the interpersonal communication skills of dental students. J Dent Educ 2005; 69(2), 281-284. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.0022-0337.2005.69.2.tb03914.x

23.

23. Fugill M. Teaching and learning in dental student clinical practice. Eur J Dent Educ 2005; 9(3), 131-136. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0579.2005.00378.x

24.

24. 김정교 “원내생 진료실, 문제없나요?”, Dental Issue, 2018.10.3, https://www.dtissue.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=420

25.

25. 치과대학〮치의학전문대학원 치의학교육 인증기준, 한국치의학교육평가원. 2022:24-25.

logo