바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기
 
 

logo

메뉴

개조개, Saxidomus purpuratus의 중간육성 및 씨뿌림된 치패의 성장과 생존

Survival and Growth of the Purplish Washington Clam, Saxidomus purpuratus Spat Sowed in bottom and intermediate culture

초록

급감하는 개조개의 자원량을 회복하기 위한 방안으로 치패를 중간육성 후 씨뿌림하는 방식이 생존과 성장에 어떠한 영향을 미치는지 관찰하였다. 개조개 평균 각장 15.81 mm (평균 전중 0.90 g) 의 치패를 4월에 채롱에 수하하여 10월까지 중간육성한 결과 각장 22.9 mm 내외 (전중 3.88 g 내외) 로 성장하였고 생존율은 73% 이상으로 자연에 초기 치패를 씨뿌림하였을 때 보다 생존율이 높은 것으로 나타났다. 이를 다음해 1월까지 다시 씨뿌림한 결과 각장 27.6 mm (전중 6.6 g) 으로 성장하였고 생존율은 약 74%를 나타내었다. 이는 중간육성 후 씨뿌림 방식이 종묘 방류 후 나타나는 대량폐사의 문제점을 해결할 수 있는 하나의 대안으로 충분히 가능성이 있다는 사실을 보여준다.

keywords
Saxidomus purpuratus, intermediate culture, survival (%), growth

Abstract

We studied possibility of the sowing culture at the bottom after intermediate culture as a method for raising the survival of the Purplish Washington clam, Saxidomus purpuratus. The pearl net ($35cm(W){\times}35cm(B){\times}20cm(H)$) for S. prupuratus spat during the period of intermediate culture (hanging culture) from April to October in 2010. The pearl net (100 inds./net) was installed at two stations (Namhae and Pohang) being about 3-4 m in water depth. After hanging culture, S. prupuratus spat sowed in the bottom of the Gangjin Bay. The survivals (%) of intermediate culture of this species at Namhae station and Pohang station were 73% and 74%, respectively. Daily growth rate of mean shell length and mean weight in Namhae station were higher than those in Pohang station. After sowing at the bottom of the Gangjin Bay, its survival (%) showed 73.98% in January 2011. These results suggested the possibility of the intermediate culture as hanging culture for raising survival rate of S. prupuratus.

keywords
Saxidomus purpuratus, intermediate culture, survival (%), growth

참고문헌

1.

(2003). . Journal of Korean Fisheries Society, 36(5), 495-499.

2.

(1996). . Bulletin of Yamaguji Prefecture Marine Hatching, 25, 35-38.

3.

(2005). . Korean Journal of Malacology, 21(1), 65-70.

4.

5.

(2004). . Bulletin of Oita institute of Marine and Fisheries Science, 5, 29-34.

6.

(1999). . Bulletin of Fukuoka Fisheries and Marine Technology Research Center, 9, 47-50.

7.

(1997). . Bulletin of Fukuoka Fisheries and Marine Technology Research Center, 7, 27-30.

8.

(1983). . Bulletin of the Kyoto Institute of Oceanic and Fishery Science, 7, 49-53.

9.

(2007). . Korean Journal of Malacology, 23(2), 165-172.

10.

(2008). . Korean journal of Malacology, 24(1), 59-65.

11.

(2001). . Journal of Fisheries Science and Technology, 4(2), 98-100.

12.

13.

(1999). . Yellow Sea, 5, 51-58.

14.

(2001). . Bulletin of National Fishery Research and Development Institute, Korea, 59, 152-158.

15.

(2007). . Korean Journal of Malacology, 23(1), 31-38.

16.

(2004). . Journal of Korean Society Fisheries Research, 6(2), 126-139.

17.

(1997). . Marine Biology, 127, 455-461. 10.1007/s002270050033.

18.

(1982). . Journal of Fisheries of China, 6(1), 1-8.

19.

20.

(1989). . 茨城水試研報, 27, 25-132.

21.

(2001). . 兵庫水試硏究, 36, 29-34.

22.

(1971). . 北水試月報, 28(9), 2-7.

23.

24.

25.

logo