바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기
 

logo

메뉴

Can Vietnam Become The Next Tiger? Confucianism and Economic Development in the Southeast Asian Context

Abstract

Asia-Pacific Confucian Capitalism is comparable to Atlantic Protestant Capitalism in terms of economic success, as most economies influenced by Confucian culture in East Asia and Southeast Asia are economically well-off in the past 50 years, save for Vietnam. This paper seeks to determine whether Vietnam can follow the path of development of the other Confucian economies, especially in the context of globalization and upcoming regional integration. In the paper, I will use an analytic framework derived from Weber and Huntington to examine the cultural dimension of Vietnam’s economic development. In the domestic field, I argue that the core values of Confucianism continue to contribute to the development in Vietnam in many ways; yet one critical element needs to be tapped: the political culture of strong leadership and efficient bureaucracy. Confucian values for development may be compromised by pushing for democratization too early in Vietnam. On a positive note, Confucianism for Vietnam is instrumental in its regional integration into Southeast Asia since it is integrative rather than exclusive. Vietnam’s cultural similarity with China may however lead to too much passive learning and conflicts. In conclusion, Confucianism is a valuable asset for Vietnam’s economic development, but challenges have to be addressed in order for Vietnam to become the next tiger.

keywords
Confucianism, Culture, economic development, Vietnam, developmental state

Reference

1.

Callahan, William A. 2008. Chinese Visions of World Order: Posthegemonic or a New Hegemony? International Studies Review, 10(4): 749–761.

2.

Chung, Chen H., Jon M. Shepard, and Marc J. Dollinger. 1989. Max Weber Revisited: Some Lessons from East Asian Capitalistic Development. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 6 (2): 307-321.

3.

Chalmers, Johonson. 1982. MITI and the Japanese Miracle: The Growth of Industrial Policy, 1925-1975, Polo Alto: Stanford University Press.

4.

Chu, Yun-han. 1989. State Structure and Economic Adjustment of the East Asian Newly Industrialized Countries. International Organization, 43(4) : 647-72.

5.

Huntington, Samuel. 2011. The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

6.

Jamieson, Neil. 1979. Understanding Vietnam. Berkeley: University of California Press.

7.

Evans, Peter. 1995. Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

8.

Fforde, Adam. 2013. Vietnam’s Political Crisis Blocks Needed Reforms. World Politics Review, July 2, 2013. http://www.worldpoliticsreview.com/articles/13064/vietnam-s-political-crisis-blocks-needed-reforms. (Accessed Oct. 30, 2014).

9.

Henderson, Errol A. 1997. Culture or Contiguity Ethnic Conflict, the Similarity of States, and the Onset of War, 1820-1989. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 41( 5): 649-668.

10.

Markinen, Julie. 2014. Vietnam mobs torch foreign factories in anti- China protests. Los Angeles Times, May 14:1. http://www.latimes.com/world/asia/la-fg-china-vietnam-dispute-20140514-story.html#page=1 (accessed August 15, 2014).

11.

McKendrick, David. 2000. From Silicon Valley to Singapore - Location and Competitive Advantage in the Hard Disk Drive Industry, Polo Alto: Stanford University Press.

12.

Ohno, Kenichi. 2009. Avoiding the Middle-Income Trap: Renovating Industrial Policy Formulation in Vietnam. ASEAN Economic Bulletin, 26( 1): 25-43.

13.

Tarling, Nicolas. ed. 1999. Cambridge History of Southeast Asia, Volume I, Part I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

14.

Trading Economics. 2014. Vietnam GDP Annual Growth Rate 2000-2014. http://www.tradingeconomics.com/vietnam/gdp-growth-annual (Accessed May 15, 2014).

15.

Transprancy International. 2013. Corruption Index 2013. http://cpi.transparency.org/cpi2013/results/. (Accessed May 25, 2014).

16.

Vogel, Eraz. 1991. The Four Little Dragons: The Spread of Industrialization in East Asia Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

17.

VNS. 2012, Leader Opens Sixth Party Central Committee Plenum in Capital, Vietnam News, October 22. http://vietnamnews.vn/politics-laws/230861/leader-opens-sixth-party-centralcommittee-plenum-in-capital.html. (Accessed May 20, 2014).

18.

Vu, Minh Khuong. 2013. Vietnam plays catch-up with China’s successful reforms East Asia Forum, December 13, 2013. http://lkyspp.nus.edu.sg/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/vietnam-plays-catch-up-with-chinas-successful-reforms.pdf. (Accessed April 30, 2014).

19.

Woodside, Alexander. 2012. Lost Modernities: China, Vietnam, Korea, and the Hazards of World History. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

20.

World Bank Group. 2014. Data: Coutry and Leading Groups http://data.worldbank.org/about/country-and-lending-groups#Lower_middle_income. (Accessed May1, 2014).

21.

Yu, Bingyi and Lu, Zhaolu. 2000. Confucianism and Modernity, Insights from an Interview with Tu Wei-ming. China Review International, 7(2): 377-387.

logo