Comparison Solid Phase Microextraction with Purge & Trap on the GC/MS Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds in Biota Samples

Ahn, Yun-Gyong; 안윤경; Seo, Jong-Bok; 서종복; Hong, Jongki; 홍종기

오늘 하루 그만보기

P-ISSN1225-0163
E-ISSN2288-8985
SCOPUS, ESCI, KCI

Home

Browse Articles

Article Detail

Home > Article Detail

P-ISSN 1225-0163
E-ISSN 2288-8985

e-Submission

Vol.14, No.5

PubReader Citation

Comparison Solid Phase Microextraction with Purge & Trap on the GC/MS Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds in Biota Samples

Analytical Science and Technology / Analytical Science and Technology, (P)1225-0163; (E)2288-8985

2001, v.14 no.5, pp.392-399

Ahn, Yun-Gyong
Seo, Jong-Bok
Hong, Jongki

Ahn, Y., Seo, J., & Hong, J. (2001). Comparison Solid Phase Microextraction with Purge & Trap on the GC/MS Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds in Biota Samples. , 14(5), 392-399.

copy

Abstract

The analysis of n-butylbenzene and 1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane (DBCP) as volatile organic compounds in biota samples was performed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry-selected ion monitoring mode. The target compounds, n-butylbenzene and DBCP, in biota samples were extracted by headspace solid phase microextraction (SPME) with $100{\mu}m$ polydimethyl siloxane (PDMS) fiber and purge & trap method. The extraction recoveries of these compounds obtained by SPME was 85.8% for n-butylbenzene and 92.4% for DBCP, respectively. Each value of method detection limit were $0.15{\mu}g/kg$ and $0.05{\mu}g/kg$, respectively. While in the case of purge & trap method, the extraction recovery was 115.2% for n-butylbenzene, 80.9% for DBCP and method detection limit were $0.04{\mu}g/kg$ and $0.70{\mu}g/kg$, respectively. The extraction yields and detection limits of these compounds obtained by purge & trap were equivalent to those by SPME.