Latent fingerprint development from rubber gloves using MMD I (Multimetal deposition I)
Latent fingerprint development from rubber gloves using MMD I (Multimetal deposition I)
분석과학 / Analytical Science and Technology, (P)1225-0163; (E)2288-8985
2020, v.33 no.2, pp.108-114
https://doi.org/10.5806/ast.2020.33.2.108
An, Jaeyoung
(Graduate School of Forensic Science, Soonchunhyang UniUK Home Office Grading Systemversity)
Kim, Heesu
(Graduate School of Forensic Science, Soonchunhyang UniUK Home Office Grading Systemversity)
Oh, Jungmin
(Graduate School of Forensic Science, Soonchunhyang UniUK Home Office Grading Systemversity)
Han, Sooyong
(Graduate School of Forensic Science, Soonchunhyang UniUK Home Office Grading Systemversity)
Yu, Jeseol
(Graduate School of Forensic Science, Soonchunhyang UniUK Home Office Grading Systemversity)
An, Jaeyoung,
Kim, Heesu,
Oh, Jungmin,
Han, Sooyong,
&
Yu, Jeseol.
(2020). Latent fingerprint development from rubber gloves using MMD I (Multimetal deposition I). , 33(2), 108-114, https://doi.org/10.5806/ast.2020.33.2.108
Abstract
Gloves are very important evidence at a crime scene; specifically, rubber gloves can be found easily at homes. Therefore, crime scene investigators attempt to develop fingerprints inside the rubber gloves that are discovered, for identifying unknown suspects. This study compared the effectiveness of three different methods that are used for developing latent prints on gloves with aging time. These were the powder, cyanoacrylate fuming, and multi-metal deposition I methods. The powder method achieved good results for 1-3 days of aged prints, and the cyanoacrylate fuming method worked well on 2-week-old prints. In comparison, multi-metal deposition I method developed good quality fingerprints for 6 weeks of aging time.
- keywords
-
Colloidal gold,
Multimetal deposition I,
rubber glove,
Fingerprint