Latent fingerprint development from rubber gloves using MMD I (Multimetal deposition I)

An, Jaeyoung; An, Jaeyoung; Kim, Heesu; Kim, Heesu; Oh, Jungmin; Oh, Jungmin; Han, Sooyong; Han, Sooyong; Yu, Jeseol; Yu, Jeseol

doi:10.5806/ast.2020.33.2.108

오늘 하루 그만보기

P-ISSN1225-0163
E-ISSN2288-8985
SCOPUS, ESCI, KCI

Home

Browse Articles

Article Detail

Home > Article Detail

P-ISSN 1225-0163
E-ISSN 2288-8985

Article Contents

e-Submission

Vol.33, No.2

PubReader PDF Citation

Latent fingerprint development from rubber gloves using MMD I (Multimetal deposition I)

Analytical Science and Technology / Analytical Science and Technology, (P)1225-0163; (E)2288-8985

2020, v.33 no.2, pp.108-114

https://doi.org/10.5806/ast.2020.33.2.108

An, Jaeyoung
Kim, Heesu
Oh, Jungmin
Han, Sooyong
Yu, Jeseol

An,, J. , Kim,, H. , Oh,, J. , Han,, S. , & Yu,, J. (2020). Latent fingerprint development from rubber gloves using MMD I (Multimetal deposition I). , 33(2), 108-114, https://doi.org/10.5806/ast.2020.33.2.108

copy

Abstract

Gloves are very important evidence at a crime scene; specifically, rubber gloves can be found easily at homes. Therefore, crime scene investigators attempt to develop fingerprints inside the rubber gloves that are discovered, for identifying unknown suspects. This study compared the effectiveness of three different methods that are used for developing latent prints on gloves with aging time. These were the powder, cyanoacrylate fuming, and multi-metal deposition I methods. The powder method achieved good results for 1-3 days of aged prints, and the cyanoacrylate fuming method worked well on 2-week-old prints. In comparison, multi-metal deposition I method developed good quality fingerprints for 6 weeks of aging time.