바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기
 

logo

  • P-ISSN1738-3110
  • E-ISSN2093-7717
  • SCOPUS, ESCI

A Case study of Equity Carve-out In the Korean Distribution Industry: Focusing on the SSG.com

The Journal of Distribution Science / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2023, v.21 no.6, pp.21-29
https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.21.06.202306.21
SHIN Ilhang
MOON TAEGON

Abstract

Purpose: Research on equity carve-outs is necessary because the market has realized that they lead to holding company discounts by double counting, which can only be observed in the Korean market. Considering the differences in the SSG.com equity carve-out compared to previous cases in terms of business strategy, this study contributes to the literature by examining the effects on shareholder value in the Korean distribution industry. Research design, data, and methodology: This study investigated literature, analyst reports, and news articles to examine the causes of holding company discounts and analyze the SSG.com equity carve-out. Results: The monopoly of holding companies’ listing premiums is the main cause underlying holding company discounts from equity carve-outs. Protections for minority shareholder value are challenging owing to the complexity of the process of acquiring rights, the short exercise period, and additional costs. Therefore, the motivation for equity carve-outs should be to increase overall shareholder value. Conclusion: By analyzing the reasons for holding company discounts in the Korean distribution industry, this study provides recommendations for improving shareholder value. Moreover, it contributes to the maturation of the Korean capital market by promoting a discussion on the revision of equity carve-outs.

keywords
Equity carve-out, Spin-off, E-commerce industry, E-commerce distribution, SSG.com, E-Mart

Reference

1.

Annema, A., Fallon, W. C., & Goedhart, M. H. (2001) Do Carve-outs Make Sense? Yes, But Not for the Reasons You Might Think. McKinsey on Finance, 2, 6-10.

2.

Choi, J., Y. (2011, February 16). Shinsegae-E-Mart split 26 to 74. The JoongAng. https://www.joongang.co.kr/article/5061260#home. Date of last accessed: 2022.06.07.

3.

Hong, B., K., & Park, S., H. (2019). Corporate Law, Bob Mun Sa, 7

4.

Hwang, N., S. (2012). On Corporate Division in American Corporation Law. The Korean Journal of Securities Law, 12(3), 261-298.

5.

Kim. H., C. (2015). Legal Research on Market out exception for Korean Appraisal Laws. Korea Financial Law Association, 12(3), 317-340.

6.

Kim. S., J. (2022, February 15). [After the Shinsegae spin-off]①Larger appearance...Market value cut in half. BLOTER. https://www.bloter.net/news/articleView.html?idxno=43196. Date of last accessed: 2022.06.07.

7.

Kim. S., S. (2018). A Review of Appraisal Rights. Business Law Review, 32(1), 159-197.

8.

Kwon, J., Y. (2022). Review of Measures to Make so-called ʻChain Listingʼ Better. Korean Commercial Law Association, 41(2), 113-138.

9.

Lee, S., H. (2019). The corporate law implications of the NPS`voting in Samsung C&T Merger case - the paradigm shift from CAS to SIS -. Commercial Law Review, 38(2), 45-88.

10.

Lee, S. H. (2020). LG Chem's Company Split: Holding Company Discount and the Remedy under Korean Law. Kyungpook Natl. Univ. Law Journal, 71, 301-334

11.

Park, J., Suh, J. W., & Kang, S. W. (2019). The Holding Company Discount in Korea’s Stock Market. Korean Journal of Financial Studies, 48(6), 755-788.

12.

Park, J., W. (2022). Split-off of LG Chem and Spin-off of SK Telecom. Korea Business Review, 26(3), 71-93.

13.

Rommens, A., Deloof, M., & Jegers, M. (2004) Why do holding companies in pyramidal groups trade at a discount. Repository.uantwerpen.be

14.

Son, Y., H., Yang, B., C., & Koh, J., J. (2017). A Study on the Limitation of Appraisal Rights of Shareholders by Listed Companies - Centered on the Comparison with Three Countries in Northeast Asia -. Chonbuk Law Review, 51, 337-361.

15.

Song, J., Y. (2022, April 20). Regulatory move on 'IPO after spinoff'--SSG.com listing a hurdle? Sisajournal-e. http://www.sisajournal-e.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=267345. Date of last accessed: 2022.06.07.

16.

Um, S., Y. (2013). A Comparative Study on Regulatory System of Appraisal Rights and Some Proposals for Improvement. The Korean Journal of Securities Law, 14(2), 165-205.

The Journal of Distribution Science