Risk and Responsibility: Understanding the Distribution of Serious Accident Punishment Act

Choongik, C. (2023). Risk and Responsibility: Understanding the Distribution of Serious Accident Punishment Act. , 21(6), 31-38, https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.21.06.202306.31

copy

Abstract

Purpose: This paper investigates how companies respond to government regulations and disasters in a risk-managed society, and aims to initiate discussions on the future prospects and challenges. Specifically, it explores how companies can plan to respond to such disasters in the future, and stresses that the law should be to protect people's lives and ensure safety, rather than to punish companies. Research design, data and methodology: The study methodology is based on a review of existing literature, as well as trend analysis through big data analysis. The research analyzes the discourse in our society regarding the enactment of the Serious Accident Punishment Act. Results: This study supports that the Serious Accident Punishment Act should be implemented in a manner that does not impede corporate activities, but rather helps to ensure the safety of citizens' daily lives. The authors call for collaboration between communities, labor unions, and companies in achieving a cooperative governance system for a safer society. Conclusions: It highlights the importance of addressing disasters and government regulations in the context of a risk-managed society, and offers insights for both companies and policymakers on how to navigate these challenges. By prioritizing safety and cooperation, we can work towards building a safer and more resilient society

keywords: Serious Accident Punishment Act, Risk-managed Society, Government Regulations, Company, Collaboration, Resilient Society

Reference

Beck, U. (1992). Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London:Sage.

Construction &Economy Research Institute of Korea (2020). The Comparison between the Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007 and the Serious Accident Punishment Act. Construction Issue Focus (pp. 1-29). Dec 2020, Seoul, Korea

Giddens, A. (1999). Risk and Responsibility, The Modern Law Review, 62(1), 1-10.

Giddens, A. (2009). The Politics of Climate Change. Cambridge:Polity Press.

Gobert, J. (2008). The Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007 – Thirteen years in the making but was it worth the wait? The Modern Law Review, 71(3), 413-433.

Hwang, J. (2022). Criminal Justice in a Time of Ecological Crisis:Can the Serious Accidents Punishment Act in Korea Be Enforced to Punish ‘Ecocide’? International Journal of Criminal Justice, 4(2), 30-57.

Maslow, A. (1959). New Knowledge in Human Values. New York:Harper

Ministry of Employment and Labor (2021). Statistics of Industrial Accidents and Deaths 2020. Retrieved September 30, 2022(actual access date), from https://www.index.go.kr/unity/potal/main/EachDtlPageDetail.do?idx_cd=1514

Perrow, C. (1999). Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies, Princeton: Princeton University Press

10.

Roper, V. (2018). The Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007—A 10-Year Review. The Journal of Criminal Law, 82(1), 48–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022018317752937

11.

Samuels A. (2007). The Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007: how will it affect the medical world? Medico-legal journal, 75(2), 72-79.

바로가기메뉴

Article Contents

Vol.21 No.6

Risk and Responsibility: Understanding the Distribution of Serious Accident Punishment Act

Abstract

Reference

The Journal of Distribution Science