바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기
 
 

logo

  • ENGLISH
  • P-ISSN2287-8327
  • E-ISSN2288-1220
  • SCOPUS, KCI

A review of remote sensing applications in flower phenology detection

Journal of Ecology and Environment / Journal of Ecology and Environment, (P)2287-8327; (E)2288-1220
2025, v.49 no.1, pp.5-70
https://doi.org/10.5141/jee.24.118
Rahimi Ehsan (Agricultural Science and Technology Institute, Andong National University, Andong 36729, Republic of Korea)
Jung Chuleui (Agriculture Science and Technology Research Institute Andong National University Andong (Gyeongsangbuk‐do) Republic of KoreaDepartment of Plant Medicals Andong National University Andong (Gyeongsangbuk‐do) Republic of Korea)

Abstract

The shift in flowering phenology with plants blooming earlier due to climate change, disrupts the synchronization between plants and pollinators by creating temporal and spatial mismatches. Monitoring these shifts is essential, and remote sensing has become an invaluable tool for detecting flowering periods over vast areas. Despite the technological advancements, there remains a significant gap in comprehensive reviews that explore the use of remote sensing in flowering phenology and its impact on pollination ecology. Therefore, this study aims to review and summarize research on the remote sensing of flowers, with a particular focus on key techniques used to analyze flowering phenology. We categorized the application of remote sensing in the field of flowering phenology into four groups based on the type of data used: optical, Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR), Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV), and PhenoCam-based applications. In each section, we have reviewed and provided a summary of the studies conducted in this field, with a particular focus on those that primarily examine canola crop flowering. In conclusion, our findings reveal that Optical remote sensing, proves effective in capturing detailed imagery of flowering events, while SAR technology offers robust, all-weather monitoring capabilities. UAV-based remote sensing provides high-resolution, site-specific data, although it is constrained by operational limitations. PhenoCams offer valuable long-term monitoring but lack the spatial resolution for detailed analysis. Each remote sensing approach has distinct advantages and limitations, underscoring the need for integrated methods to improve flowering phenology assessments and enhance agricultural monitoring.

keywords
climate change, optical, PhenoCams, plants, pollination, Synthetic Aperture Radar, Unmanned Aerial Vehicle

Journal of Ecology and Environment