
open access
메뉴
ISSN : 1229-0718
본 연구는 Vygotsky의 ZPD개념에서 출발한 역동적인 측정방법을 소개하고 이 방법을 종래의 정적측정방법에 의해 이루어진 지능지수와 비교함으로써 이것이 유아의 학습잠재력측정에 어떻게 기여할 수 있는지를 밝히기 위해 이루어졌다. 유치원 및 유아원에 다니는 5, 6세의 남녀 아동 265명에게 KEDI-WISC(1986)와 Bryant 등(1983)이 개발, 본 연구자들이 수정한 학습잠재력 검사를 실시하였다. 그 결과, 지능이 높을수록 준거도달시까지의 학습훈련량이 적어진데 비하여 학습전이가 더욱 잘되는 것으로 나타났다. 더욱 중요한 것은, 역동적인 측정치인 학습훈련량과 학습전이량은 정적인 측정치인 지능지수에 부가하여 학습잠재력(잔여획득점수)을 훨씬 더 많이 예언해 주고 있음이 밝혀졌다.
This study aims to explore the relationships among intelligence, learning/transfer ability and learning potentiality. The subjects of this study were 265 children selected from 3 kindergardens and 3 nursery schools. Instruments for the study were KEDI-WISC( Verbal scale, Performance scale) and test of learning potentiality by Bryant et al.(1985) which was modified by these authors. The major statistical methods for the analysis were correlation, multiple regression and t-test. The major findings of this study were as follows; First, assistance needed in learning was negatively related the Performance IQ(p<.001). The children who gained high scores in Performance Scale needed less assistence than those of low score children to achieve the same mastery level. And the Performance IQ accounted for 17% of the variance of training and the Verbal IQ a further 1%. Second, assistance needed in transfer was negatively related both the Performance IQ and the Verbal IQ(p<. 001). The children who gained high scores in both scales required less assistence than those of low score children to achieve the same mastery level. And the Performance IQ accounted for 14% of the variance of transfer and the verbal IQ a further 2%. Third, assistance needed in both training and transfer were negatively related in IQ(Performance and Verbal). Higher IQ children required less assistance than low-IQ children to achieve the same mastery level. Finally, IQ accounted for 6% of the variance in learning potentiality and both the transfer and the training a further 15%.