open access
메뉴
E-ISSN : 2733-4538
DSM-5 Section III에서는 성격장애에 대한 차원-범주 혼합모델(Hybrid dimensional-categorical model)을 제안하였다. 이 모델이 성격장애를 평가하는 데 보다 유용하게 이용될 수 있도록 DSM-5 성격질문지(The Personality Inventory for DSM-5, PID-5)가 개발되었지만, 220 문항의 다수 문항으로 인하여 참가자의 피로유발 및 시간적 효율성 문제가 제기될 수 있다. 본 연구에서는 성격장애 평가를 간결하게 실시할 수 있는 한국판 DSM-5 성격질문지 단축형(K-PID-5-SF)을 구성하고 타당도를 검증하고자 하였다. 확인적 요인분석 결과 K-PID-5-SF 는 원형과 동일한 5요인 구조로 나타났다. K-PID-5-SF는 내적합치도가 적절한 수준이었으며, 한국판 PID-5, 성격장애 진단검사, Personality Psychopathology Five (PSY-5) 척도 및 NEO-Five Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI)와 유의한 상관을 보였다. 본 연구는 K-PID-5-SF가 성격장애를 평가하는 데 타당한 도구임을 보여주었으며, DSM-5 Secion III 성격장애 모델의 경험적 연구에 기여할 것으로 기대된다.
The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-5 (DSM-5) Section III includes a hybrid dimensional-categorical model of personality disorders. The Personality Inventory for the DSM-5 (PID-5) was developed with 220 items to assess the personality traits within this model but has several limitations such as fatigue and difficulty in maintaining attention. The im of this study was to develop and validate the Korean version of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Short Form (K-PID- 5-SF). Through confirmatory factor analysis, it was found that K-PID-5-SF had similar factor structures to those of the Korean version of PID-5. The internal consistency of the K-PID-5-SF was adequate. The K-PID-5-SF had significant correlations with the Korean version of PID-5, Korean Personality Disorders Test, the Personality Psychopathology Five, and the NEO-Five Factor Inventory. In conclusion, the K-PID-5-SF had adequate reliability and validity for evaluating personality pathology, contributing to a better understanding of an alternative DSM-5 model for personality disorders.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington., DC: American Psychiatric Publishing.
Anderson, J. L., Sellbom, M., Ayearst, L., Quilty, L. C., Chmielewski, M., & Bagby, R. M. (2015). Associations between DSM-5 section III personality traits and the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory 2-Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) scales in a psychiatric patient sample. Psychological Assessment, 27, 801-815.
Chmielewski, M., Bagby, R. M., Markon, K., Ring, A. J., & Ryder, A. G. (2014). Openness to experience, intellect, schizotypal personality disorder, and psychoticism: Resolving the controversy. Journal of Personality Disorders, 28, 483-499.
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Normal personality assessment in clinical practice: The NEO Personality Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 4, 5-13.
De Fruyt, F., De Clercq, B., De Bolle, M., Wille, B., Markon, K., & Krueger, R. F. (2013). General and maladaptive traits in a fivefactor framework for DSM-5 in a university student sample. Assessment, 20, 295-307.
Edwards, P., Roberts, I., Sandercock, P., & Frost, C. (2004). Followup by mail in clinical trials: Does questionnaire length matter?. Controlled Clinical Trials, 25, 31-52.
Few, L. R., Miller, J. D., Rothbaum, A. O., Meller, S., Maples, J., Terry, D. P., & MacKillop, J. (2013). Examination of the section III DSM-5 diagnostic system for personality disorders in an outpatient clinical sample. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 122, 1057-1069.
Fossati, A., Krueger, R. F., Markon, K. E., Borroni, S., & Maffei, C.(2013). Reliability and validity of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) predicting DSM-IV personality disorders and psychopathy in community-dwelling Italian adults. Assessment, 20, 689-708.
Gore, W. L., & Widiger, T. A. (2013). The DSM-5 dimensional trait model and five-factor models of general personality. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 122, 816-821.
Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Factor Analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Harkness A. R., McNulty J. L., Ben-Porath Y. S. (1995). The personality psychopathology five (PSY-5): Constructs and MMPI-2 scales. Psychological Assessment, 7, 104-114.
Hong, S. H. (2000). The criteria for selecting appropriate fit indices in structural equation modeling and their rationales. Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 19, 161-177.
Hong, T. H., Hwang, S. T., & Kim, Y. L. (2018). Replication study of the Korean version Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (K-PID-5). Manuscript in preparation.
Jepson, C., Asch, D. A., Hershey, J. C., & Ubel, P. A. (2005). In a mailed physician survey, questionnaire length had a threshold effect on response rate. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 58, 103-105.
Kim, J. H., Kim, B. H., & Ha, M. S. (2011). Validation of a Korean version of the Big Five Inventory. Journal of Human Understanding and Counseling, 32, 47-65.
Krueger, R. F., Derringer, J., Markon, K. E., Watson, D., & Skodol, A. E. (2012). Initial construction of a maladaptive personality trait model and inventory for DSM-5. Psychological Medicine, 42, 1879-1980.
Lee, K. I. (1995). Factor structure and maladaptive group profiles of the Revised NEO Personality Inventory for Korean (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Pusan Natoinal University, Busan, Korea.
Maples, J. L., Carter, N. T., Few, L. R., Crego, C., Gore, W. L., Samuel, D. B., & Krueger, R. F. (2015). Testing whether the DSM-5 personality disorder trait model can be measured with a reduced set of items: An item response theory investigation of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5. Psychological Assessment, 27, 1195-1210. https://doi.org/10.15842/kjcp.2018.37.3.010 407
Quilty, L. C., Ayearst, L., Chmielewski, M., Pollock, B. G., & Bagby, R. M. (2013). The psychometric properties of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 in an APA DSM-5 field trial sample. Assessment, 3, 362-369.
Seo, J. S., & Hwang, S. T. (2006). Development and validation of the Korean Personality Disorders Test. Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 25, 273-288.
Shin, S. Y., & Hwang, S. T. (2016). Reliability and validity of the Korean version Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5). Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, 30, 1-24.
Skodol, A. E., Bender, D. S., Morey, L. C., Clark, L. A., Oldham, J. M., Alarcon, R. D., & Siever, L. J. (2011). Personality disorder types proposed for DSM-5. Journal of Personality Disorders, 25, 136-169.
Suzuki, T., Samuel, D. B., Pahlen, S., & Krueger, R. F. (2015). DSM-5 alternative personality disorder model traits as maladaptive extreme variants of the five-factor model: An item-response theory analysis. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 124, 343-354.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon/Pearson Education.
Thomas, K. M., Yalch, M. M., Krueger, R. F., Wright, A. G., Markon, K. E., & Hopwood, C. J. (2012). The convergent structure of DSM-5 personality trait facets and five-factor model trait domains. Assessment, 3, 308-311.
Watson, D., Stasik, S. M., Ro, E., & Clark, L. A. (2013). Integrating normal and pathological personality: Relating the DSM-5 traitdimensional model to general traits of personality. Assessment, 3, 312-326.
Widiger, T. A., & Simonsen, E. (2005). Alternative dimensional models of personality disorder: Finding a common ground. Journal of Personality Disorders, 19, 110-130.
Yam, W. H., & Simms, L. J. (2014). Comparing criterion-and traitbased personality disorder diagnoses in DSM-5. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 123, 802-808.
