바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기
 

logo

메뉴

The Explanatory Models of Dating Violence and Victimization With Dating Partners Among College Students

Abstract

The aim of present study is to test and explain the theoretical models of dating sexual violence that based on the psychological variables reportedly related with former researches. Through literature review, we selected the variables that related with dating sexual violence: sex-role acceptance, rape myth, awareness of sex-dating violence control, and sexual self-assertiveness and hypothesized models. The models of dating sexual violence and victimization are as follows. a sexual violence model postulates that males are likely to violate their dating partners when they have traditional sex-role acceptance, rape-myth, low degree of dating violence awareness. And, partner control, as mediating variable, mediates these three variables toward sexual violent behavior in dating relationship. Sexual victimization model postulates that females who have traditional sex-role acceptance, rape-myth, low degree of dating violence awareness are likely to be violated by their dating partners. And, sexual self-assertiveness, as a mediating variable, mediates these three variables toward sexual victimization in dating relationship. The models were estimated with AMOS 4.0. For this study, 989 college student were selected as a samples. The result of structural equation modeling suggested that partner control in sexual violence model mediated between the acceptance of rape myth and sexually violent behavior. Moreover, sexual self-assertiveness in sexual victimization model mediated between both the acceptance of rape myth and sex-role acceptance and sexual victimization in dating relationship. The implication and limitations of the study were discussed along with some suggestions for future researches and psychotherapy practice.

keywords
dating violence, rape myth, sexual relationship, sex-role acceptance, 데이트성폭력, 강간통념, 성역할 수용, 성적 자기 주장성, 데이트 상대 통제 경향, dating violence, rape myth, sexual relationship, sex-role acceptance

Reference

1.

(1996) 미혼 대학생의 혼전 단계에서의 신체적 폭력의 경험에 관한 실태조사 연구,

2.

(1999) 대학생의 이성교제 중 폭력과 대처 행동,

3.

(2001) 성희롱문제 지각에서 성차 및 성역할 태도의 영향,

4.

(2001) 대학생의 애착 사랑유형에 따른 성행동,

5.

(2003) 대학생 데이트 성폭력 실태와 가해 예측요인에 관한 연구,

6.

(2002) 데이트 폭력 경험자들의 분노 정신병적 경향성 및 중독성,

7.

(2001) 성장기에 부모의 배우자 폭력에 노출된 경험과 초기 성인기의 적응,

8.

(2002) 이성교제 폭력행동과 관련된 개인적 변인들에 관한 연구,

9.

(2003) 성폭력 가해자 상담 매뉴얼, 여성민우회

10.

(2000) 여대생의 가정폭력 피해와 이성교제폭력 피해간의 매개요인에 관한 연구,

11.

(2004) 이성교제에서 원하지 않는 성관계 요구의 응낙에 대한 설명 모형-대학생 중심으로 ,

12.

(1998) 이성교제 중 발생한 폭력,

13.

(2001) 대학생 이성교제폭력의 실태와 위험 요인들,

14.

(1999) 강간통념척도의 개발과 타당도 검증 ,

15.

(2001) 강간통념수용도에 따른 성행동 성폭력 및 성폭행사건 지각 사회 및 성격,

16.

(2004) 2003년 대학생 성의식 및 성폭력 실태조사,

17.

(2001) 성폭력의 의미구성과 ‘성적 자기결정권’의 딜레마,

18.

(2000) 십대 소녀의 임신률 예방대책 ,

19.

(2003) 여고생의 성적 자기주장 프로그램 참여 효과,

20.

(2000) 일개 대학 대학생들의 성지식 태도 경험에 관한 조사연구,

21.

(2003) ^소식지 나눔터 33호,

22.

(1988) Considerations for prevention of HIV infection among Hispanic women Psychology of Women Quarterly,

23.

(1980) Cutural myths and support for rape,

24.

(1982) Journal of Family Issues,

25.

(1999) Is partner aggression related to appraisals of coercive control by a partner?,

26.

(1978) Attitudes toward rape A comparative analysis of police Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,

27.

(2002) Relationship Power, decision making, and sexual relations: an exploratory study with couples of Mexican origin,

28.

(2000) Patterns of Conflict Resolution Within Relationships and Coercive Sexual Behavior of Men and Women,

29.

(2003) Sexual compliance: gender, motivational, and relationship.,

30.

(1978) Development and validation of a sex role ideology scale,

31.

(1993) Detecting the scope of rape:A review of prevalence research methods,

32.

(1990) Young women in danger, Seal press

33.

(1981) Rape proclivity among males,

34.

(1987186-196) Dating rape and sexual aggerssion in dating situations Journal of Counseling and Psychology, Incidence and risk factors

35.

(2000) Measuring sexual relationship power in HIV/STD research.,

36.

(1984) Personality and attitudinal characteristics of sexually coercive college males,

37.

(1989) A theoretical model of courtship aggression Violence in dating relationships,

38.

(1988) I never called it rape, Haper & Row

39.

(1998) Partner influences and gender-related factors associated with noncondom use among young adult African-American women,

40.

(2000) Application of the Theory of Gender and Power to examine HIV related exposures risk factors and effective interventions for women,

41.

(1997) Implications for HIV/AIDS risk reduction and education ,

logo