- P-ISSN 2671-8197
- E-ISSN 2733-936X
Hagok’s study in Hagok Miscellany is about explaining Mencius Theory in Mencius. His study is different from Chu Hsi’s thoery on the book of Mencius in terms of psychological approach. Mencius Theory divided into Mencius Theory Sang and Mencius Theory Ha. Mencius Theory Sang consists of ‘Hoyonzangdo’, ‘Hoyonzangsang Analysis1’, ‘Hoyonzangzong Analysis2’, ‘Hoyonzangha Analysis’. Mecius Theory Ha consists of ‘Hoyonzangzong Analysis’, ‘Hoyonzang Analysis3’, ‘Hoyonzang analysis4’ ‘Hoyonzang Analysis5’ ‘Hoyonzang Comprehensive Analysis’ ‘Sadanzang Analysis’, ‘Sadanzang Comprehensive analysis’, ‘Saengjiwesengzang Analysis’, ‘Gaozi Comprehensive Analysis’, ‘Cheonhajiwensengzang Analysis’, ‘Jibdeasengzang Analysis’, ‘Jonggo Wonyu Hoyong Hohua Analysis’, ‘Various Chapter Comprehensive Analysis’, ‘Mencius Theory’, Etc,. Gaozi Comprehensive Analysis is composed of 9 chapters. First of all, this introduces Gaozi’s insist, secondly Menzi’s opinion, and finally Hagok. Gaozi Comprehensive Analysis shows detailed information on Gaozi’s insist in Chapter 7 of Mencius theory. Total contents are from Gaozi’s Human nature theory. Cheonhajiwensengzang Analysis is the most difficult part in Mencius theory. In this analysis, Hagok criticized Zhuzi’s analysis and followed Mengzi’s interpretation on the issue. Various Chapter comprehensive Analysis explains several things, but the key word on the analysis is ‘The Mind’. Therefore this is included in same category with Mecius theory. Mencius theory is from whole ‘Mencius’ and total contens is focused on ‘The Mind’. In spite of Mencius theory is located in the end of ‘Mencius’, It is more understandable that readers read the theory at first. In this respect, Hagok rarely refers to Wang yangming’s ‘zhi liang zhi’ in terms of ‘Mencius Theory’, ‘Gaozi Comprehensive Analysis’, ‘cheonhajiwensengzang Analysis’, ‘Various Chapter comprehensive analysis’. As a result, Hagok is categorized as the first ‘Yangming School’ in Joseon dynasty. However I want to look at him as the first Joseon’s Mencius Scholar. In the meantime, Hagok is is the successor of Mengzi and also the first legitimacy confucian in Joseon dynasty.
김수중ㆍ조남호ㆍ천병돈 공편, 강화학파의 연구문헌 해제 . 인천: 인천대학교 인천학연구원, 2007.
민족문화추진회, 국역 하곡집Ⅰ . 서울: 민족문화문고간행회, 1984, 증판.
윤남한, 조선시대 양명학 연구 . 서울: 집문당, 1982.
鄭齊斗, 霞谷集 . 影印標點韓國文集叢刊 160집.
蔡仁厚, 천병돈 역, 맹자의 철학 . 서울: 예문서원, 2000.
張載, 張載集 . 臺北: 漢京文化事業有限公司, 1983.
朱熹 撰. 四書集注 . 臺北: 漢京文化事業有限公司, 1983.
김용재, 「霞谷 鄭齋斗의 四書 經說 硏究」. 성균관대학교 박사학위논문, 2002.
김용재, 「하곡 정제두의 중용 해설」. 한문고전연구 11호, 2005, 409-438쪽.
김용재, 「조선양명학파의 논어 해석」. 양명학 22호, 2009.4, 361-385쪽.
민혜진, 「하곡 정제두의 중용설 연구」. 대동철학 25집, 2004.3, 1-26쪽.
민혜진, 「정제두의 대학설과 그 일체적 지향」. 철학논총 36집, 2004.4, 27-51쪽.
박원재, 「하곡 정제두의 중용 해석의 특징 ‒ 하곡학의 사상적 경향성과 관련하여」. 국학연구 1호, 2002년 가을ㆍ겨울, 207-230쪽.
유철호, 「하곡 정제두의 「대학설」에 관한 고찰」. 양명학 5호, 2001.2. 117-146쪽.
任文利, 「鄭齊斗對 大學 經典文本的疏解」. 양명학 22호, 2009.4, 387-411쪽.
임선영, 「하곡 정제두의 양명학적 중용 이해」. 한국철학논집 13집, 2003.9,47-74쪽.
임선영, 「하곡 정제두의 「중용설」 小考」. 강화 양명학학파의 위상과 현대적 의미 ,강화양명학파 국제학술대회 논문집, 2004.10, 179-194쪽.
黃俊傑, 「從東亞儒學視域論鄭齊斗對孟子<知言養氣>說的解釋」. 양명학 13호, 2005.2,139-156쪽.