_한글.jpg){kind=logo}
- P-ISSN 2671-8197
- E-ISSN 2733-936X
- ENGLISH
- P-ISSN2671-8197
- E-ISSN2733-936X
- KCI
논문 상세
Home > 논문 상세
공자의 분권적 제한군주정과 영국 내각제의 기원(1)-윌리엄 템플의 중국 내각제 분석과 찰스 2세의 헌정개혁
The Confucian Idea of Divided Government of Limited Monarchy and the Origin of the Britain Cabinet System (1)
한국학 / Korean Studies Quarterly, (P)2671-8197; (E)2733-936X
2014, v.37 no.2, pp.214-274
https://doi.org/10.25024/ksq.37.2.201406.214
(동국대학교)
황태연.
(2014). 공자의 분권적 제한군주정과 영국 내각제의 기원(1)-윌리엄 템플의 중국 내각제 분석과 찰스 2세의 헌정개혁. , 37(2), 214-274, https://doi.org/10.25024/ksq.37.2.201406.214
- 다운로드 수
- 조회수
Abstract
The article discusses the historical event in which the Chinese cabinet system of Ming and Ch’ing dynasty was introduced by William Temple under Charles Ⅱ into Great Britain and after the Glorious Revolution (1688‒1689) developed to the modern cabinet system. The author will handle this theme in series of several parts. This part of the article is restricted only to the Chinese cabinet system itself and the Confucian political philosophy which supports this system. Confucius’ governmental ideal is a divided common ruling of king and ministers or limited monarchy according to the principle of ‘ruling by inaction (wuwei)’ and ‘king reigning without governing’. This divided common ruling of king and ministers consist in a power division between people’s sovereignty, king’s reigning power, and wise ministers’ governmental power, based on the theory of the popular origin of the right of kings. This philosophy of division of reigning and governing premises the ‘virtue‒founded politics’ of king which grounds on the empathy between king and people. The Chinese cabinet system of Ming and Ch’ing dynasty took as governmental ideal the limited monarchy of which Confucius dreamed. And it in a way realized this dream. Here the Monarch was regarded as a king on whom the kingship was conferred by the people, while the wise ministers was regarded as the wisest men who was recognized by all the people under the sky. This divided common ruling of king and ministers was in the Chinese history of Ming and Ch’ing dynasty realized as the divided government of limited monarchy founded on the cabinet system. The Ming Founder Hongmu Emperor(洪武帝) in the year 1380 abolished the corrupt Chancellor system and introduced his own advisory and secretary ad hoc privy council named Four Advisors of old literati, i.e. the sprout of cabinet. But it was difficult for him to employ old wise literati. So he 1382 again abolished Four Advisors system and employed as advisors and assistants the young wise men from the Academy Assembly. The third emperor(永樂帝) succeeded this ad hoc advisory privy council and institutionalized it as official organ. This organ was established by the fourth and fifth emperor (1424‒1435) as independent cabinet council with its own bureaucracy. In this period the cabinet members became as teachers of prince given preferential treatment. And in the period of the fifth emperor a deliberative power also was given to the cabinet. Meanwhile, the cabinet was established as the highest organ in the Ming government which could check the arbitrary working of the imperial power. In the period (1457‒1464) of the seventh emperor the cabinet at last monopolized the deliberative decision‒making power. At that time, the prime minister appeared spontaneously and became stronger as power‒holder who checked and balanced the imperial power. With the advance of the strong cabinet system under the strong prime minister, the emperor became weakened and nominalized to a ritual and ceremonial authority. And the inner structure of the cabinet also was changed from the deliberative council of equal cabineteers to a hierarchical board under the prime minister. In the period of the eighth emperor (1464‒1487) who was dependent on eunuchs the cabinet system became temporarily incapacitated. But in the period of the eleventh emperor (1521‒1567) the prime‒ministerial cabinet system became resurrected to a stronger organ. Thereafter this stronger cabinet system led the Ming‒period China to a world‒wide prosperity. But the cabinet system was destroyed due to the usurpation of imperial authority and cabinet power and the malgovernment by the eunuchs under the unwise emperors in the last dynastical period. With the collapse of the cabinet system Ming dynasty fell into ruin. Ch’ing dynasty succeeded the cabinet system of the Ming dynasty and more institutionally developed it. Ch’ing dynasty extirpated the possibility of the political involvement of eunuchs, and in some way modified the power position of the cabinet by the establishment of Military Privy Council as concurrent highest decision‒making organ, in favor of strengthening the personal governing by the emperor.
- keywords
- 무위지치, 분권적 군신공치, 내각제, 내각대학사, 수상 또는 수보, ruling by inaction [wuwei], divided common ruling of king and ministers, cabinet system, cabinet member, Colao, prime minister
참고문헌
1
論語
2
大學
3
孟子
4
書經
5
中庸
6
易經
7
禮記
8
명조실록: 世宗實錄 . 臺北: 中文出版社, 1961(民國五十一年).
9
孫承澤 撰, 春明夢餘錄 . 珍本: 1883; 影印本: 香港: 龍門書店, 1965.
10
楊家輅 主編, 明會要 . 臺北: 世界書局, 中華民國四十九年.
11
張廷玉 等 撰, 明史 . 乾隆四年刻本, 中華民國24年 즈음 影印.
12
丁若鏞, 國譯與猶堂全書 . ｢經集 Ⅱ 論語古今註｣, 전주대학교출판부, 1989.
13
夏燮, 明通鑑 . 北京: 中華書局, 1959.
14
黃宗羲, 明夷待訪錄 . 原本: 1663; 浙江梨洲文獻館 保管 慈溪鄭氏二老閣 初刻本(황종희 저, 김덕균 옮김, 명이대방록 . 한길사, 2000; 재판 2003).
15
金斗鉉. ｢淸朝政權의 成立과 發展｣. 서울대학교 東洋史學연구실 編, 講座 中國史(Ⅳ) , 지식산업사, 1989.
16
金容郁, ｢조선조 정치체제의 議政府에 관한 연구｣. 한국정치학회보 제21집 제1호, 1987.
17
김한규, 天下國家: 전통시대 동아시아 세계질서 . 소나무, 2005.
18
杜乃濟, 明代內閣制度 , 臺北: 臺灣商務印刷書館, 1967.
19
송미령, 청대 정책결정기구와 정치세력 . 혜안, 2005.
20
安震, 大明風雲 . 長春: 長春出版社, 2005(안쩐 저, 정근회 역, 천추흥망(명나라) , 따뜻한 손, 2010).
21
尹貞粉, ｢宣德年間(1426‒1435)의 經史講論과 그 특징‒宣德初 현안 문제와 선덕제의 정국운영과 관련하여｣. 中國史硏究 第57輯, 2008. 12.
22
尹貞粉, ｢正統·天順年間의 經史講論과 정국운영｣. 中國史硏究 第61輯, 2009. 8.
23
尹貞粉, ｢洪治年間(1488‒1505)의 經筵과 政局運營‒내각제 복원과 공론정치와 관련하여｣. 中國史硏究 第73輯, 2011. 8.
24
吳緝華, ｢論明代廢相與相權之轉移｣. 明代制度史論叢(上) , 臺北: 臺灣學生書局, 1970(中華民國 六十年).
25
吳緝華, ｢明仁宣時內閣制度之變與宦官僭越相權之禍｣. 明代制度史論叢(上) , 臺北: 臺灣學生書局, 1970(中華民國 六十年).
26
錢穆, 中國歷代政治得失 . 上海: 三聯書店, 1955; 재판 2005, 44쪽(인터넷파일쪽수‒검색일: 2011. 11. 11).
27
曹永祿, ｢嘉靖初 政治對立과 科道官｣. 동양사연구 제21집, 1985.
28
曹永祿, 中國近世政治史硏究 . 지식산업사, 1988.
29
崔鳳基, ｢조선조 최고정책결정기구의 분석｣. 사회과학논총 창간호, 1983.
30
崔晶姸, ｢明朝의 統治體制와 政治｣. 서울大學校東洋史學硏究室 編, 강좌중국사(Ⅳ) , 지식산업사, 1989.
31
韓忠熙, ｢조선 초기 議政府 연구(상)｣. 한국사연구 제31호, 1980.
32
韓忠熙, ｢조선 초기 議政府 연구(하)｣. 한국사연구 제32호, 1981.
33
韓忠熙, ｢조선 중·후기 의정부제의 변천연구｣. 한국학논집 제43집, 2011.
34
황태연, 공자와 세계(2·3) 제1권 ｢공자의 지식철학(중·하)｣. 청계, 2011.
35
황태연, ｢서구 자유시장론과 복지국가론에 대한 공맹과 사마천의 무위시장 이념과양민철학의 영향｣. 정신문화연구 제35권 제2호, 통권 127호, 2012.
36
황태연, ｢공자의 공감적 무위·현세주의와 서구 관용사상의 동아시아적 기원(上·下)｣. 정신문화연구 제36권 제2·3호, 2013.
37
공자의 공감적 무위·현세주의와
38
Ames, Roger T., The Art of Rulership: A Study of Ancient Chinese Political Thought. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1994.
39
Clarke, John J., Outlines of Central Government. London: Sir Isaac Pitman & Sons, LTD., 1919; 12th edition 1958.
40
Charles Darwin, The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. In:Charles Darwin, Evolutionary Writings, edited, with an Introduction and Notes by James A. Secord, Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, 2010.
41
Dennerline, Jerry, “The Shun‒chi Reign.” In: Peterson(ed.), The Cambridge History of China, Volume 9, Part One: The Ch’ing Empire to 1800. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
42
de Waal, Frans, The Age of Empathy. Nature’s Lessons for a Kinder Society. New York: Three Rivers Press, 2009.
43
Huang, Pei, Autocracy at Work. A Study of Yung‒cheng Period, 1723‒1735. Bloomington & London: Indiana University Press, 1974.
44
Hucker, Charles O., “Ming Government.” In: Denis Twitchett and Frederick W. Mote(ed.), The Cambridge History of China, Volume 8, The Ming Dynasty, 1368‒1644, Part 2, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998;Reprinted 2007.
45
Li, Gertraude Roth, “State Building before 1644.” In: Willard J. Peterson(ed.), The Cambridge History of China, Volume 9, Part One: The Ch’ing Empire to 1800, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
46
Navarrete, Domingo Fernandez, Tratados Historicos, Politicos, Ethicos, y Religiosos de la Monarchia de China (Madrid: 1676; 불역본 Paris: 1676). Dominic Fernandez Navarrete, An Account of the Empire of China;Historical, Political, Moral and Religious, London: H. Lintot, J. Osborn, 1681.
47
Nieuhoff, John, An Embassy from the East‒Indian Company of the United Provinces to the Grand Tatar Cham, Emperour of China, delivered by their Excellencies Peter de Goyer and Jakob de Keyzer, At his Imperial City of Peking (1655), (Hague: 1669; 영역본 ‒ London: Printed by John Mocock, for the Author, 1669).
48
Peterson, Willard, “Confucian Learning in Late Ming Thought.” Denis Twitchett and Frederick W. Mote(ed.), The Cambridge History of China , Volume 8, The Ming Dynasty, 1368‒1644, Part 2, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998, 2007.
49
Temple, Sir William, “Of Heroic Virtue.” In: The Works of William Temple, Vol. Ⅲ, London: Printed by S. Hamilton, Weybridge, 1814.
50
Temple, Sir William, “An Essay upon the Ancient and Modern Learning.” In:The Works of William Temple, Vol. Ⅲ, London: Printed by S. Hamilton, Weybridge, 1814.
51
Temple, Sir William, Memoirs, Part Ⅲ. From the Peace concluded 1679, to the Time of the Author’s Retirement from Publick Business, publish’d by Jonathan Swift, London: Printed for Benjamin Tooke, at the Middle‒Temple Gate in Fleet‒street, 1709.
52
Webb, John, An [sic!] Historical Essay, Endeavoring a Probability that the Language of the Empire of China is the Primitive Language. London, 1669. 재판: Antiquity of China, or An [sic!] Historical Essay, Endeavoring a Probability that the Language of the Empire of China is the Primitive Language. London: Printed for Obadiah Blagrave, 1678.
53
Wu, Silas H. L.(吳秀良), Communication and Imperial Control in China. Evolution of the Palace Memorial System 1693‒1735. Cambridge of Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1970.
54
Zelin, Madeleine, “The Yung‒cheng Reign.” In: Peterson(ed.), The Cambridge History of China, Volume 9, Part One: The Ch’ing Empire to 1800. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
학술지 홈페이지 이용 환경은 크롬 브라우저 사용을 권장합니다.