The purpose of this study is to evaluate current library cooperation system and to identify what fields should be cooperated with other libraries. A survey and group interviews are used for research method. The results show that only under 30% of respondents estimated the success of library cooperation system. The system needs to be changed. Online catalog and DB are evaluated as important fields, while the shared/cooperation acquisition is evaluated as less important field in current cooperation system. Also, education cooperation, the cooperation of education and culture programs, and advertisement cooperation are more necessary. The shared/cooperation acquisition is less necessary in library cooperation filed. The membership libraries of cooperation systems and library location are affected to responses as a factor. This study proposes two library cooperation systems: upload library cooperation system and download library cooperation system.
Library of California. http.z/www.library.ca .gov/loc/index.htmI.
National Library of Scotland. http://www.nls.uk/.
Shortgrass Library System. http://www.shortgrass-lib. ab.ca/.
New York State Library. (0000). Division of Library Development. .
CONARLS. Library Regions in profile.
American Library Association. (1986). American LibraryDirectory. .
(1997). . 도서관, 52(1), 3-25.
한국도서관협회. (1994). 도서관정보관리편람. .
Sewell, Philip H.. (1981). Resource Sharing. .
Boucher, Virginia. (1997). Interlibrary Loan Practices Handbook. .
