바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기
 
 

logo

  • P-ISSN1229-2435
  • E-ISSN2799-4767
  • KCI

논문 상세

이전 다음
논문 투고

Vol.18 No.2

PDF Citation Share

차세대 OPAC의 인터페이스와 기능에 관한 연구

A Study on Next Generation OPAC's Interface and Function

한국비블리아학회지 / Journal Of Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, (P)1229-2435; (E)2799-4767
2007, v.18 no.2, pp.61-88
https://doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2007.18.2.061
구중억 (한국기초과학지원연구원 연구정책부)
곽승진 (충남대학교 문헌정보학과)
구중억, & 곽승진. (2007). 차세대 OPAC의 인터페이스와 기능에 관한 연구. , 18(2), 61-88, https://doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2007.18.2.061

초록

본 연구의 목적은 국내도서관에서 현행 OPAC의 인터페이스와 기능을 개선하여 차세대 OPAC의 인터페이스와 기능을 갖추는데 실질적인 기초자료와 도움을 제공하는데 있다. 본 연구에서는 OPAC의 개념과 발전과정, 이용자의 도서관 이용행태, OPAC의 이용자 이용행태, 도서관의 위기인식, 도서관의 OPAC 인식 등에 관한 선행연구와 실태조사 결과를 토대로 OPAC의 인터페이스와 기능을 개선하는데 중요하게 고려해야 하는 요소들을 살펴보았다. 그리고 현행 OPAC의 인터페이스와 기능에 관한 사례분석은 검색창, 검색항목, 검색기법, 정렬기능, 검색결과 디스플레이, 검색결과 피드백에 중점을 두었다. 또한 최근에 개발된 국내외 도서관 상용 및 오픈소스 소프트웨어에서 제공하는 차세대 OPAC의 검색 인터페이스, 검색 기능 및 Library 2.0 서비스 측면에서 구체적인 사례를 분석하였다. 마지막으로 국내도서관에서 현행 OPAC의 인터페이스와 기능을 개선하기 위한 방안을 제시하였다.

keywords
디지털도서관, 온라인목록, 인터페이스, 도서관 2.0

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to provide an actual basic data and helps for arranging the next generation OPAC's interface and function through improving the existing OPAC's interface and improvement in the domestic library. In this study, factors to be importantly considered for improving the OPAC's interface and function were examined based on the preceding studies on OPAC concept & development process, user's library use style, user use style of OPAC, and recognition on library's crisis, and actual condition investigation result. Also, the case analysis on the existing OPAC's interface and function was focused on the search window, search item, search method, alignment function, search result display and search result feedback. Also, the search interface and search function of the next generation OPAC which is provided by the recently-developed domestic and foreign library utilization, and the detailed case were analyzed in the aspect of Library 2.0 service. Finally, the measures for improving the existing OPAC's interface and function in domestic library were suggested.

keywords
디지털도서관, 온라인목록, 인터페이스, 도서관 2.0

참고문헌

1.

(주) 이씨오. [cited 2007.11.9].. <http://www.eco.co.kr/>.

2.

(주)SA&K. [cited 2007.11.9].. <http://www.sa3000.com/>.

3.

(1996). . 한국문헌정보학회지, 30(3), 25-36.

4.

구중억. (2007). 차세대 OPAC 의 동향 및 전망. '라이브러리 2.0과 RISS 서비스 발전 방향 포럼 .

5.

상지대학교 학술정보원. <http://library.sangji.ac.kr/SJU/>.

6.

서울대학교 중앙도서관. [cited 2007.11. <http://library.snu.ac.kr>.

7.

연세대학교 중앙도서관. [cited 2007.11.9].. <http://library.yonsei.ac.kr/>.

8.

이화여자대학교 도서관. [cited 2007.11.9].. <http://lib.ewha.ac.kr/>.

9.

포항공과대학교 청암학술정보관. [cited 2007.11.9].. <http://library.postech.ac.kr/>.

10.

한국교원대학교 도서관· [cited 2007.11.9].. <http://lib.knue.ac.kr/>.

11.

한국도서관협회. 한국도서관연감.

12.

(2006). . Information Technology and Libraries, 25(3), 128-139.

13.

British Library. 'Redefining the Library: The British Library's Strategy 2005-2008.'.

14.

Connotea. [cited 2007.11.9].. <http://www.connotea.org/>.

15.

deLicio.us. [cited 2007.11.9].. <http://deLicio.us/>.

16.

Dellit;Alison;Fitch;Kent. Rethinking the catalogue.

17.

FaceBook. [cited 2007.11.9].. <http://www.facebook.com/>.

18.

(2005). . Library Trends, 53(4), 539-554.

19.

Kemp, Rebecca. Catalog/Cataloging Changes and Web 2.0 Functionality: New Directions for Serials.

20.

KohaZOOM. [cited 2007.11.9].. <http://zoomopac.liblime.com/>.

21.

Lucene NBD Home Prototype. [cited 2007. 11. 9].. <http://l101.nla.gov.au/>.

22.

OCLC. Perceptions of Libraries and Information Resources.

23.

OCLC WorldCat. [cited 2007.11.9]. <http://www.worldcat.org/>.

24.

OpenSearch. [cited 2007.11.9].. <http://www.opensearch.org/>.

25.

Pace;Andrew, K.. Users and Uses of Bibliographic Data: The Promise and Paradox of Bibliographic Control.

26.

Phoenix Public Library. [cited 2007.11.9].. <http://www.phoenixpubliclibrary.org/>.

27.

Polaris Library Systems. [cited 2007.11.9].. <http://www.gisinfosystems.com/>.

28.

Primo. [cited 2007.11.9].. <http://www.exlibrisgroup.com/primo.htm>.

29.

Queens Library. [cited 2007.11.9].. <http://aqua.queenslibrarY.org/>.

30.

ReleMed. [cited 2007.11.9].. <http://www.relemed.com/>.

31.

Serials Solutions. [cited 2007.11.9].. (0000). http://www.serialssolutions.com/>. .

32.

DIUC Undergraduate Library. [cited 2007.11.9].. <http://www.library.uiuc.edu/ugl/>.

33.

University of Minnesota Libraries. [cited 2007.11.9].. <http://www.lib.umn.edu/>.

34.

University of Queensland Library. [cited 2007.11.9].. <http://library.uq.edu.au/>.

35.

(1991). . Reference Services Review, 19, 49-56.

36.

(2006). . 한국문헌정보학회지, 40(1), 263-292.

37.

Encore. [cited 2007.11.9].. <http://www.iii.com/encore/>.

38.

Endeca. [cited 2007.11.9].. <http://endeca.com/>.

39.

Grokker. [cited 2007.11.9].. <http://www.grokker.com/>.

40.

NCSU Libraries. [cited 2007.11.9].. <http://www.lib.ncsu.edu/catalog/>.

41.

Amazon Web Services. [cited 2007.11.9].. <http://aws.amazon.com/>.

42.

Hennepin County Library. [cited 2007.11.9].. <http://www.hclib.org/>.

43.

iGoogle. [cited 2007.11.9].. <http://www.google.co.kr/ig>.

44.

Lamson Library. [cited 2007.11.9].. <http://www.plymouth.edu/library/>.

45.

MySpace. [cited 2007.11.9].. <http://www.myspace.com/>.

46.

(주)퓨쳐인포넷. [cited 2007.11.9].. <http://www.futureinfonet.co.kr/>.

47.

청주대학교 중앙도서관· [cited 2007.11.9].. <http://wuam.chongju.ac.kr/>.

48.

Athens County Public Libraries. [cited 2007.11.9].. <http://search.athenscounty.lib.oh.us/>.

49.

Google. [cited 2007.11.9].. <http://www.google.com/>.

50.

Schneider;Karen, G.. How OPACs Suck, Part 2: The Checklist of Shame.

51.

경북대학교 중앙도서관. [cited 2007.11.9].. <http://gangnam.lib.seoul.kr/>.

52.

중부대학교 학술정보센터. [cited 2007.11.9].. <http://julis.joongbu.ac.kr/>.

53.

Ann Arbor District Library. [cited 2007.11.9].. <http://www.aadl.org/>.

54.

Harvard Libraries. [cited 2007.11.9].. <http://lib.harvard.edu/>.

55.

Innovative Interfaces, Inc. [cited 2007.11.9].. <http://www.iii.com/>.

56.

LibraryThing. [cited 2007.11.9].. <http://www.librarything.com/>.

57.

San Mateo County Library. [cited 2007.11.9].. <http://www.smcl.org/>.

58.

Barnard;John, Phillip. A Study of Internet and Library Use An Academic Setting, Ph. D. Dissertation.

59.

Syndetic Solutions. [cited 2007.11.9].. <http://www.syndetics.com/>.

60.

UIDC University Library. [cited 2007.11.9].. <http://www.library.uiuc.edu/>.

61.

Borgman, Christine L.. (1996). Why are online catalogs still hard to use?. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 47(7), 493-503. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199607)47:7<493::AID-ASI3>3.0.CO;2-P.

62.

MIT Libraries. [cited 2007.11.9].. <http://libraries.mit.edu/>.

63.

(2007). . Library+Information Update, 6(10), 32-34.

64.

Schneider;Karen, G.. How OPACs Sueκ Part 1: Relevance Rank.

65.

UCSD BSTF. Rethinking How We Provide Bibliographic Services for the University of California.

66.

(1984). . Information Technology and Libraries, 3(4), 354-376.

67.

장진덕. 네이버 검색결과를 바라보는 시선을 '추적'하라!.

68.

(1986). . Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 37(6), 387-400.

69.

사공철(編). 문헌정보학용어사전.

70.

Lau, E.P.;Goh, D.H.L.. (2006). In search of query patterns: A case study of a university OPAC. Information Processing & Management, 42(5), 1316-1329. 10.1016/j.ipm.2006.02.003.

71.

VuFind. [cited 2007.11.9]. <http://www.vufind.org/>.

72.

Scriblio. [cited 2007.11.9].. <http://about.scriblio.net/>.

73.

마이야후!. [cited 2007.11.9].. <http://kr.my.yahoo.com/>.

74.

(주) 아이네크. [cited 2007.11.9].. <http://www.inek.co.kr/>.

75.

국가자료공동목록시스템. [cited 2007.11.9].. <http://www.nl.go.kr/kolisnet/>.

76.

대양정보. [cited 2007.11.9].. <http://www.dayang.co.kr/>.

77.

Evergreen. [cited 2007.11.9].. <http://www.open-ils.org/>.

78.

Cook Memorial Library. [cited 2007.11.9].. <http://www.tamworth.lib.nh.us/>.

79.

Ex Libris. [cited 2007.11.9].. <http://www.exlibrisgroup.com/>.

80.

(1991). . RQ, 30(3), 395-402.

81.

IREP. Google, Yahoo! 檢索結果畵面での視点デ一夕を收集したアイ . 卜ラツキング調査を實施O.

82.

김정현. (2007). 미래 대학도서관 역할의 전망 - USC 도서관을 중심으로 .

83.

(2000). . 한국정보관리학회지, 17(2), 139-153.

84.

The 2005 Student Survey on the University of Virginia Library.

85.

UWA Library. [cited 2007.11.9].. <http://www.library.uwa.edu.au/>.

86.

Shneiderman. (1982). . Communications of the ACM, 25(9), 610-611. 10.1145/358628.358639.

87.

이지연. (2007). 라이브러리 2.0과 RISS 서비스발전 방향 .

88.

(2007). . Library Technology Reports, 49(4), 5-14.

89.

Google Book Search. [cited 2007.11.9].. <http://books.google.com/>.

90.

(1985). . Annual Review of Information Service and Technology, 20, 234-241.

91.

University of Washington Libraries. [cited 2007.11.9].. <http://www.lib.washington.edu/>.

92.

구중억. (2007). Library 2.0 의 국내외 사례 및 주요 구조, 기능설계 .

93.

네이버 Open API. [cited 2007.11.9].. <http://openapi.naver.com/>.

94.

성균관대학교 학술정보관. [cited 2007.11.9].. <http://skkcl.skku.ac.kr/>.

95.

Calhoun, Karen. The Changing Nature of the Catalog and its Integration with Other Discovery Tools.

96.

EBSCO Publishing. [cited 2007.11.9].. <http://www.ebscohost.com/>.

97.

WordPress. [cited 2007.11.9]. <http://wordpress.org/>.

98.

Georgia Tech Library & Information Center. [cited 2007.11.9].. <http://www.library.gatech.edu/>.

99.

국립중앙도서관. [cited 2007.11.9].. <http://www.nl.go.kr/>.

100.

A9.com. [cited 2007.11.9].. <http://www.a9.com/>.

101.

Jones, Steve;Cunningham, Sally Jo;McNab, Rodger;Boddie, Stefan. (2000). A transaction log analysis of a digital library. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 3(2), 152-169. 10.1007/s007999900022.

102.

Amazon.com. [cited 2007.11.9].. <http://www.amazon.com>.

103.

Hildreth, C.R.. (1991). Advancing toward the E3 OPAC: the imperative path', in Van Pulis. N(Eds) (39-48).

104.

Baker & Taylor’s Content Cafe. [cited 2007.11.9].. <http://www.btol.com/>.

105.

Byrd;Jackie(et al). A White Paper on the Future of Cataloging at Indiana University.

106.

Flamenco. [cited 2007.11.9].. <http://flamenco.berkeley.edu/>.

107.

(2007). . Library Journal, 132(6), 36-49.

108.

Hearst, Marti. (2006). Design Recommendations for Hierarchical Faceted Search Interfaces .

109.

(2005). . Library Journal, 103(19), 30.

110.

Villanova University. [cited 2007.11.9]. <http://research.library.villanova.edu/>.

111.

(주)라이브텍. [cited 2007.11.9].. <http://libtech.co.kr/>.

112.

Henderson Libraries. [cited 2007.11.9].. <http://hawk.hdpl.org/>.

113.

OCLC. Sharing, Privacy and Trust in Our Networked World.

114.

Pace;Andrew, K.. Library Automation: Yesterday's Technology.

115.

Foster;Nancy, F.Bowen, J.;Lindahl, D.,;Randall, R.. eXtensible Catalog Survey Report.

116.

(주) 미르테크. [cited 2007.11.9].. <http://www.mirtech.co.kr/>.

117.

AquaBrowser. [cited 2007.11.9].. http://www.aquabrowser.com/>.

118.

British Library. [cited 2007.11.9].. <http://www.bl.uk/>.

119.

Vivisimo. [cited 2007.11.9]. <http://vivisimo.com/>.

120.

Jean and Alexander Heard Library. [cited 2007.11.9].. <http://alphasearch.library.vanderbilt.edu/>.

121.

강남도서관. [cited 2007.11.9].. <http://gangnam.lib.seoul.kr/>.

122.

다음 Open API. [cited 2007.11.9].. <http://dna.daum.net/apis>.

123.

(1998). . 정보관리학회지, 15(2), 89-110.

124.

Hotchkiss, Gord. Eye Tracking Report: Google.

125.

(1989). . Journal of Academic Librarianship, 15(5), 267-273.

126.

Schneider;Karen, G.. How OPACs Suck, Part 3: The Big Picture.

127.

(2005). . The Chronicle Review, 51(18), B13.

128.

경기공업대학 도서관. [cited 2007.11.9].. <http://lib.kinst.ac.kr/>.

한국비블리아학회지

논문 투고 OA 정책