바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기
 

logo

  • P-ISSN1229-2435
  • E-ISSN2799-4767
  • KCI

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.19 No.1

PDF Citation Share

A Research on the Development of Performance Indicators and Action Plans for Academic Libraries in Korea

Journal Of Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science / Journal Of Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, (P)1229-2435; (E)2799-4767
2008, v.19 no.1, pp.113-130
https://doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2008.19.1.113
Kwack, Dong-Chul
Kwack,, D. (2008). A Research on the Development of Performance Indicators and Action Plans for Academic Libraries in Korea. , 19(1), 113-130, https://doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2008.19.1.113

Abstract

Performance indicators for academic libraries in Korea suggested in this research cover three areas, that is, collection, budget, and human resources, which consists of three subdivisions, respectively. Performance indicators and action plans in this research were prepared, based on the official documents which universities in Korea formally submitted to the Ministry of Education and Human Resources, and the data published by the related institutions. Performance indicators and action plans are intended to draw attentions of university administrators and headquarters, but do not require librarians to prepare for evaluation. The better results would be expected with the development and application of both quantitative and qualitative indicators for information services by standardizing and unifying the process of collecting statistics. It is also expected that periodic and continuing evaluation of academic libraries could help government and universities have a better understanding of and appreciate the significance of academic libraries.

keywords
대학도서관, 도서관통계, 도서관평가, 평가지표, 도서관경영

Reference

1.

Hernon, P.;Dugan, R.. (2002). An Action Plan for Outcomes Assessment in Your Library. .

2.

WASC, CSCU. (2004). How to Become Accredited: Procedures Manual on Eligibility. .

3.

한국교육학술정보원. (2005). 대학도서관 평가제도 개선 방안에 관한 연구. .

4.

Gratch-Lindauer, B.. (2002). Comparing the regional accrediation standards: outcomes assessment and other trends. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 28(1), 14-25. 10.1016/S0099-1333(01)00280-4.

5.

International Organization for Standardization. (2003). ISO/TR 20983: Information and Documentation-Performance Indicators for electronic library service. .

6.

NISO. (2002). ANSI/NISO Z39.7-2002 Library Statistics. .

7.

한국문화정책개발원. (2005). 문화예술통계. .

8.

Fuegi, D.. (2000). LIBECON2000 and the Future of International Library Statistics. IFLA Journal, 26(2), 112-114. 10.1177/034003520002600205.

9.

(2002). . 한국문헌정보학회지, 36(2), 74-87.

10.

곽동철. (2007). 대학도서관 평가 지표 개발 및 실행 방안에 관한 연구. .

11.

국공립대학도서관협의회. (2007). 국립대학도서관보. .

12.

Association of College and Research Libraries. (2000). tandard for College Libraries 2000 Edition. .

13.

(2004). . 한국비블리아, 15(2), 5-25.

14.

NEASC. (2004). Draft Standards for Accreditation. .

15.

(1998). . 도서관, 53(2), 94-121.

16.

Nelson, W.. (2004). Library Standards in Higher Education: an Overview. .

17.

Nelson, W;Fernekes, R.. (2002). Standards and Assessment for Academic Libraries: a Workbook. .

18.

문화관광부. (2007). 국가 도서관통계시스템 효율적 구축방안. .

19.

한국사립대학교 도서관협의회. (2007). 회원교편람. .

20.

국립중앙도서관. (2006). 한국 도서관통계 실용안 개발을 위한 기초연구. .

21.

(2002). . 국회도서관보, 32(2), 59-72.

22.

한국도서관협회. (2006). 한국도서관연감. .

Journal Of Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science

e-Submission OA Policy