바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기
 
 

logo

  • P-ISSN1229-2435
  • E-ISSN2799-4767
  • KCI

논문 상세

다음
논문 투고

Vol.20 No.2

PDF Citation Share

국립중앙도서관의 출판시도서목록(CIP) 서지레코드의 평가

Examining of the National Library of Korea Cataloging in Publication(CIP) Records

한국비블리아학회지 / Journal Of Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, (P)1229-2435; (E)2799-4767
2009, v.20 no.2, pp.5-15
https://doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2009.20.2.005
김선애 (경성대학교 문헌정보학과)
김선애. (2009). 국립중앙도서관의 출판시도서목록(CIP) 서지레코드의 평가. , 20(2), 5-15, https://doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2009.20.2.005

초록

이 연구는 국립중앙도서관의 출판시도서목록(CIP)의 서지레코드를 국립중앙도서관의 온라인목록 데이터베이스를 통해 제공하는 최종 서지레코드와 비교하는데 그 목적이 있다. 본 연구는 동일한 자료에 대해 국립중앙도서관의 CIP 레코드와 OPAC 레코드의 비교분석을 통해 서지기술의 내용과 요소 등의 차원에서 서지기술상의 유사성과 차이점을 분석하였다. 분석대상 레코드는 국립중앙도서관의 출판시도서목록센터에서 제공하는 출판예정자료중 출판예정일이 2008년 11월 1일부터 12월 30일인 자료를 선정하였다. 분석결과, 개별도서관에서 자체목록을 구축하기 위해 카피편목할 수 있는 정보원으로 국립중앙도서관의 CIP 레코드가 신뢰할 수 있는 수준이 아니라는 결과가 나왔다. 도서관들은 목록의 품질과 정확성을 제고시키기 위해 반드시 CIP 레코드에 대해 검증과 변경 및 조정과정을 거쳐야 할 것이다.

keywords
출판시도서목록, 목록, 온라인 목록, 목록평가

Abstract

This study attempts to compare the National Library of Korea (NLK)'s cataloging in publication(CIP) records with their permanent records in the National Library of Korea(NLK)'s online public access catalogue(OPAC) database. This study compares the description of records in the NLK CIP versus NLK OPAC in terms of similarities and differences in the bibliographic elements for each record. The study selected the NLK's CIP records from November to December 2008, allowing to publish the registered CIP titles and also the NLK to make the records avaliable in their OPAC database. The finding indicate that libraries that use NLK's CIP records in their copy cataloging activity should not rely 100 per cent on the records. Verifications and modifications need to be carried out to ensure accuracy and quality of their catalogue records.

keywords
출판시도서목록, 목록, 온라인 목록, 목록평가

참고문헌

1.

(2004). Survey of National CIP Programs: Results and Analysis . Proceedings of Library of Congress for the 70th the IFLA World Library and Information Congress.

2.

(2002). A catalogue quality audit tool. Library Management, 23(6;7), 314-324. 10.1108/01435120210432282.

3.

(1979). Discrepancies in CIP: how serious is the problem?. Library Journal, 104(4), 2281-2287.

4.

(1994). Quality cataloging: to improve user access . Proceedings of the 1994 Joint PPM/LAS Congress: Towards Achieving High Performance Libraries, Vision for Future, USM and PPM.

5.

(1996). Developing new roles for paraprofessional in cataloging. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 22(1), 26-32. 10.1016/S0099-1333(96)90031-2.

6.

(1984). A Comparison of british Library CIP and CIP revised records. Journal of Librarianship, 16(3), 199-210. 10.1177/096100068401600304.

7.

(1983). MARC CIP records and MARC LC records: An Evaluative Study of Their Discrepancies. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 4(2), 27-39. 10.1300/J104v04n02_03.

8.

Measuring Quality: International Guidelines for Performance Measurement in Academic Libraries.

9.

(1989). Much ado about nothing: OCLC and RLIN cataloging quality. Library Journal, 114(2), 38-40.

10.

(1997). CIP의 시행에 관한 고찰 (517-535). 행간 윤영대박사화갑기념논문집.

11.

(2006). Examining the quality of National Library of Malaysia (NLM) cataloguing in publication(CIP) records. Library Review, 55(6), 363-373. 10.1108/00242530610674776.

12.

(1978). A study of errors found in non-MARC cataloging in machine-assisted system. Journal of Library Automation, 11(2), 125-132.

13.

(1996). Quality in bibliographic control. Library Trends, 44(3), 491-505.

14.

(1992). Time and workflow study of the cataloging process used to evaluate Library of Congress cardset as a cataloging support service. Library Resources and Technical Services, 36(4), 426-440.

15.

출판시도서목록(CIP) 편람.

16.

;;. (2001). Designing Korean Cataloging in Publication System. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 35(2), 59-74.

17.

Yoon Cheong-Ok;. (2005). A Study on the Bibliographic Utility and Its Use of CIP Data : With a Focus on the LC CIP Program and OCLC. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 36(2), 349-367.

18.

(1990). Quality in cataloging: making distinctions. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 16(4), 213-218.

19.

문헌정보학 용어사전.

20.

(1989). Cataloging time and work flow. OCLC Newsletter, 182(November/December), 10-13.

21.

(1986). Accuracy of LC copy: a comparison between copy that began as CIP and other LC cataloging. Library Resources and Technical Services, 30(4), 375-387.

22.

(2005). 목록업무에 있어서 CIP 제도의 적용에 관한 연구. 신라대학교 논문집(인문.사회과학대학편), 55, 97-122.

한국비블리아학회지

논문 투고 OA 정책