바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기
 
 

logo

  • P-ISSN1229-2435
  • E-ISSN2799-4767
  • KCI

논문 상세

이전 다음
논문 투고

Vol.25 No.4

PDF Citation Share

주제 접근의 다양성과 국립중앙도서관 주제명 표목의 활용가능성에 관한 연구

A Study on Varieties of Subject Access and Usabilities of the National Library of Korea Subject Headings

한국비블리아학회지 / Journal Of Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, (P)1229-2435; (E)2799-4767
2014, v.25 no.4, pp.171-185
https://doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2014.25.4.171
정연경 (Dept. of Library and Information Science major, Ewha Womans University)
정연경. (2014). 주제 접근의 다양성과 국립중앙도서관 주제명 표목의 활용가능성에 관한 연구. , 25(4), 171-185, https://doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2014.25.4.171

초록

본 연구는 급격히 변화하는 도서관 환경 속에서 이루어지고 있는 주제 접근 방식의 다양성을 살펴보고 국립중앙도서관의 주제명표목에 관한 분석과 평가를 통해 주제 접근의 미래에 관해 제시하였다. 먼저 주제 접근의 현황과 문제점을 살펴보고 대표적인 주제명 표목인 미의회도서관 주제명표목의 장점과 단점을 바탕으로 주제명 표목의 검색 효율성을 증진하는 방법에 관해 다루었다. 소셜북마킹, 폭소노미, 태깅, 패싯 적용, 저자부여 키워드, 시소러스, 분류표, 자동완성기능 부여로 주제 접근성을 높일 수 있는 방법으로 제안하였고 국립중앙도서관의 주제명 표목의 현황과 향후 주제 접근 활용성을 높이기 위한 방안을 제시하였다.

keywords
주제 접근, 주제명 표목, 검색 효율성, 미의회도서관 주제명 표목, 국립중앙도서관

Abstract

The purposes of this study are to examine the various methods of subject access in the rapidly changing environment and to suggest the future of subject access in National Library of Korea (NLK). First of all, current status and problems of Library of Congress Subject Headings List as an representative subject headings in the world and the ways of improving effectiveness of subject retrieval were dealt with. As the ways of improving subject access, social bookmarking, folksonomy, tagging, facet applications, automatic assignment of keyword, thesauri, classification system, and auto-assigned search box were suggested. Finally, current status of NLK subject headings and the ways of improving for utilization of the subject headings as subject access were provided.

keywords
주제 접근, 주제명 표목, 검색 효율성, 미의회도서관 주제명 표목, 국립중앙도서관

참고문헌

1.

ALCTS/SAC/Subcommittee. Subject Data in the Metadata Record: Recommendations and Rationale, A Report from the ALCTS/CCS/SAC/Subcommittee on Metadata and Subject Analysis.

2.

Anderson, James and Melissa Hoffmann. (2006). A Fully Faceted Syntax for Library of Congress Subject Headings. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 43(1), 7-38. 10.1300/J104v43n01_03.

3.

Arizona Memory Project. Arizona Memory Project Home Page.

4.

Beall, Jeffrey. (2007). Search Fatigue. American Libraries, 38(3), 46-50.

5.

Cataloging Policy and Support Office. LCSH: Pre vs Post Coordination and Related Issues.

6.

Chan, L. M. (2009). Social Bookmarking and Subject Indexing . Satellite Pre-conference, IFLA Classification and Indexing Section.

7.

Chan, Lois Mai and Edward T. O'Neil. FAST: Faceted Application of Subject Terminology.

8.

Engelson, Leslie. (2013). Correlations between Title Keywords and LCSH Terms and Their Implication for Fast-Track Cataloging. Cataloging and Classification Quarterly, 51, 697-727. 10.1080/01639374.2013.779351.

9.

Fischer, Karen. (2005). Critical View of LCSH, 1990-2001: The Third Bibliographic Essay. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 41(1), 63-109. 10.1300/J104v41n01_05.

10.

Gorman, Michael. (2004). Authority Control in the Context of Bibliographic Control in the Electronic Environment. Cataloging and Classification Quarterly, 38, 11-22. 10.1300/J104v38n03_03.

11.

Gross, Tina and Arlene G. Taylor. (2005). What Have We Got to Lose?: The Effect of Controlled Vocabulary on Keyword Searching Results. College & Research Libraries, 66(3), 212-230. 10.5860/crl.66.3.212.

12.

Hearst, M. and E. Stoica. NLP Support for Faceted Navigation in Scholarly Collections.

13.

Papadakis, L., K. Konstantinos, R. Marvopodi, and M. Stefanidakis. (2009). Subject-based Information Retrieval within Digital Libraries Employing LCSHs. D-Lib Magazine, 15(9/10).

14.

Quintarelli, Emanuele. (2005). Folksonomies: Power to the People . ISKO UniMIB Meeting.

15.

Rosenfeld, L. Folksonomies?: How about metadata ecologies?.

16.

Taylor, Arlene G. and Daniel N. Joudrey. The Organization of Information.

17.

Trant, J.. (2009). Studying Social Tagging and Folksonomy: A Review and Framework. Journal of Digital Information, 10(1), 1-44.

18.

Voss, Jakob. (2007). Tagging, Folksonomy & Co - Renaissance of Manual Indexing? . Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium for Information Science.

19.

Yi, Kwan and Lois Mai Chan. (2010). Revising the Syntactical and Structural Analysis of Library of Congress Subject Headings for the Digital Environment. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(4), 677-687.

20.

백지원;정연경;. (2014). 국립중앙도서관 주제명표목표 검색 시스템 개선 방안에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 31(1), 31-51. 10.3743/KOSIM.2014.31.1.031.

21.

최윤경;정연경;. (2014). 국립중앙도서관 주제명표목표의 고품질화 방안에 관한 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 48(1), 75-95. 10.4275/KSLIS.2014.48.1.075.

한국비블리아학회지

논문 투고 OA 정책