logo

  • ENGLISH
  • P-ISSN2671-8197
  • E-ISSN2733-936X
  • KCI

논문 상세

Home > 논문 상세
  • P-ISSN 2671-8197
  • E-ISSN 2733-936X

간지기년(干支紀年)의 형성과정과 세수(歲首) 역원(曆元) 문제

A Study on the Origin of Calendar, the Starting Point of a Year and the Formation Process of Sexagenary Cycle‒based Year Calendar System

한국학 / Korean Studies Quarterly, (P)2671-8197; (E)2733-936X
2015, v.38 no.3, pp.53-78
https://doi.org/10.25024/ksq.38.3.201509.53
김만태 (동방문화대학원대학교)
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수

Abstract

The system of today’s sexagenary cycle‒based year calendar was not in good order from the beginning, and there had been various calendar systems until Chin and Han(秦漢). At the end of Former Han, Liu Xin(劉歆) found that the actual cycle of revolution of Jupiter was 11.86 years, which led to the implementation of a chao chen(超辰)‒based calendar system. There was, however, inconvenience with its actual application. Thus they started to mark the number of years according to the order of 60‒sexagenary cycle based on the 60‒year‒period of Great Conjunctions of Jupiter and Saturn regardless of the run of Jupiter. That was the sexagenary cycle‒based calendar system. It was only after the implementation of Sifen Calendar(四分曆, the quarter remainder calendar) in A.D. 85 during Latter Han that the system became generalized. As for the first month of the year that was the starting point of a year, there was a revision to Taichu Calendar(太初曆, the beginning calendar) in B.C. 104 during the reign of Emperor Wu(武帝) of Han, which led to the fixation of winter solstice in November and the reform that made the onset of spring, which was the exact middle point between winter solstice and vernal equinox, the beginning of a year. Since then, the starting point of a year by the standard of In(寅) month(建寅歲首) has been implemented according to the first month of the year of Xia dynasty except for certain periods. The implementation of the starting point of a year by the standard of In(寅) month was hugely influenced by the establishment of Wu‒Xing‒Xiang‒Sheng‒Shuo that began with wood[spring]. There is a symbolic explanation that the origin of calendar of sexagenary cycle‒based calendar was when the seven luminaries of sun, moon and the five visible planets were arranged in a straight line in the northern celestial sphere or during 4 Gapja(甲子). The actual calendar, however, has a couple of different origins of calendar of Gapin(甲寅). A good example is that the origin of calendar of Taichu Calendar(太初曆) is Gapin(甲寅) year, Gapja(甲子) month, Gapja(甲子) day, Gapja(甲子) hour according to the sexagenary cycle‒based expressions. The first year of Taichu was B.C. 104(丁丑, Jeongchuk) but the zero year of Taichu that was the standard of Taichu Calendar(太初曆) was B.C. 105, a year of Byeongja(丙子). It was changed to a year of Gapin(甲寅) through Taichu revision of the origin of calendar(太初改元). However, the origin of calendar was revised as B.C. 161(庚辰, Gyeongjin) through Sifen Calendar(四分曆) in A.D. 85, and the changed title has been in use since then.

keywords
calendar, sexagenary cycle calendar, sexagenary cycle‒based year calendar system, starting point of a year, origin of calendar, Great Conjunctions of Jupiter and Saturn, 60‒year‒period, 역법(曆法), 간지력(干支曆), 간지기년(干支紀年), 세수(歲首), 역원(曆元), 대회합(大會合), 60년 주기


참고문헌

1

古今律曆考

2

舊唐書

3

國語

4

論語集註

5

史記

6

事物紀原

7

尙書

8

書經大全

9

宋書

10

歷代建元考

11

五洲衍文長箋散稿

12

五行大義

13

爾雅

14

周易

15

晉書

16

春秋左傳注疎

17

漢書

18

淮南子

19

後漢書

20

김만태, 「민속신앙을 읽는 부호, 십간·십이지에 대한 근원적 고찰」. 민족문화연구 제54호, 2011, 259‒302쪽.

21

김만태, 한국 사주명리 연구 . 민속원, 2011.

22

김만태, 「地支의 상호 변화작용 관계로서 地支合 연구」. 철학논집 제31집, 2012, 205‒241쪽.

23

김만태·신동현, 「명리학에서 시간(時間)에 관한 논점 고찰: 자시(子時)를 중심으로」. 원불교사상과 종교문화 제59집, 2014, 429‒468쪽.

24

김원중, 중국의 문화사 . 을유문화사, 2003.

25

藪內淸 지음, 兪景老 역편, 中國의 天文學 . 전파과학사, 1985.

26

신동준, 중국문명의 기원 . 인간사랑, 2005.

27

심규철, 명리학의 연원과 이론체계에 관한 연구 . 정신문화연구원 한국학대학원박사학위논문, 2003.

28

앤서니 애브니 지음, 최광열 옮김, 시간의 문화사 . 북로드, 2007.

29

유장림, 「五行學說의 起源과 形成」. 유학연구 제3집, 1995, 287‒302쪽.

30

이문규, 고대 중국인이 바라본 하늘의 세계 . 문학과지성사, 2000.

31

이은성, 역법의 원리분석 . 정음사, 1985.

32

이종호, 유교 경전의 이해 . 중화당, 1994.

33

최진묵, 「漢代의 改曆過程과 曆譜의 성격」. 대구사학 제87집, 2007, 113‒139쪽.

34

키티 퍼거슨 지음, 이충 옮김, 티코와 케플러 . 오상, 2004.

35

萬民英, 三命通會 . 臺北: 武陵出版有限公司, 1996.

36

徐升, 淵海子平評註 . 臺北: 武陵出版有限公司, 1996.

37

蕭吉, 五行大義 . 대유학당, 1998.

38

新城新藏 著, 沈璿 譯, 中國天文學史硏究 . 臺北: 翔大圖書有限公司, 1993.

39

王力, 中國古代文化常識 . 南京: 江蘇敎育出版社, 2005.

40

寥冀亨, 子平四言集腋 . 臺北: 武陵出版有限公司, 2000.

41

袁樹珊, 命理探原 . 臺北: 武陵出版有限公司, 1996.

42

兪曉群, 數術探秘: 數在中國古代的神秘意義 . 北京: 三聯書店, 1995.

43

陳久金·楊怡, 中國古代天文與曆法 . 北京: 中國國際廣播出版社, 2010.

44

陳遵嬀, 中國天文學史(제2책: 星象編) . 臺北: 明文書局, 1985.

45

김만태, 中國天文學史(제5책: 曆法·曆書) . 臺北: 明文書局, 1998.

상단으로 이동

한국학