- P-ISSN 2671-8197
- E-ISSN 2733-936X
The purpose of this article is to review the specific problems of the field where scholars are researching Korean Studies. It would be one of various efforts to find a new path of Korean Studies. It can not be overemphasized that Korean researchers should explore the subject in the temporal and spatial context. Jeong Yag‒yong’s political thoughts are considered to have opened a new era beyond the medieval limits. But, as confirmed by two cases of Banjeong(The Restoration of the Righteous King), the realities of Joseon’s politics were more advanced than the idea of Jeong. Although the traditions of all provinces and towns are important, it seems to be more important that the studies of regional history in the late Joseon period should be conducted in the context of the construction of a unified national state. In the field of Korean literature, when we look into the place where Chunhyang and I‒doryeong first met and loved, It is revealed that the conventional explanation of Chunyang‒jeon have understood the novel in a streotyped and outdated framework. The researches of Korean Studies have placed too much importance on the words and writings of intellectuals. Scholars should make efforts to build the whole picture when they study intellectuals or a society. In order to achieve this goal, we must promote discussion and debate first of all. It is because there is a limit to the ability of every scholar. Scholars of Korean Studies are required to have basic knowledge in philosophy, history, social sciences as well as in literature and fine art. And there are more specific conditions. We need to increase the weighting of provocative agenda setting and active debates in peer reviews. It is desirable that academic conferences should be held on controversial themes. And a journal should be established that specializes in discussions and debates.
김영식, 『정약용의 문제들』. 혜안, 2014.
오수창, 『조선후기 평안도 사회발전연구』. 일조각, 2002.
임형택, 『실사구시의 한국학』. 창작과비평사, 2000.
중앙일보사 편, 『80년대 한국사회 대논쟁집』. 월간중앙 1990년 신년호 별책부록, 1990.
한길사 편, 『80년대 사회운동논쟁』. 한길사, 1989.
한길사 편, 『90년대 한국 사회의 쟁점』. 한길사, 1990.
류준필, 「소실된 ‘근대성’과 왜곡된 ‘한국학’을 넘어서」. 『창작과비평』 39‒2, 2011, 409‒412쪽.
박명림, 「박정희 시기의 헌법 정신과 내용의 해석: 절차, 조항, 개념, 의미를 중심으로」. 『역사비평』 96, 2011, 109‒139쪽.
박희병, 「통합인문학으로서의 한국학」. 『21세기 한국학, 어떻게 할 것인가』, 푸른역사, 2005, 43‒65쪽.
오수창, 「2011 역사 교육과정과 ‘자유민주주의’의 현실」. 『역사와 현실』 81, 2011, 3‒15쪽.
오수창, 「조선의 통치체제와 춘향전의 역사적 성취」. 『역사비평』 99, 2012, 341‒372쪽.
오수창 , 「조선왕조 개창의 형식과 논리: 禪讓論과 추대 사실의 검토」. 『東方學志』 176, 2016, 93‒119쪽.
오수창, 「춘향전에 담긴 저항의 원동력과 필연성」. 『한국사론』 63, 서울대학교 국사학과, 2017, 335‒367쪽.
오수창 , 「오늘날의 역사학, 정조 연간 탕평정치, 그리고 19세기 세도정치의 삼각대화」. 『정조와 정조 이후』, 역사비평사, 2017, 204‒234쪽.
유초하, 「현실과 소통하는 한국학의 정립을 위한 예비적 시론: 한국유학을 중심으로」. 『국학연구』 14, 2009, 5‒32쪽.
조성을, 「정약용의 정치사상: 정치이념을 중심으로」. 『우송 조동걸선생 정년기념논총 1』, 나남, 1997, 394‒412쪽.
허영란, 「지방사를 넘어, 지역사로의 전환: 한국 근대 지역사 연구의 현황과 새로운모색」. 『지방사와 지방문화』 20‒2, 2017, 347‒379쪽.