.jpg){kind=logo}
- P-ISSN 2671-8197
- E-ISSN 2733-936X
- KOREAN
- P-ISSN2671-8197
- E-ISSN2733-936X
- KCI
Article Detail
Home > Article Detail
Japanese Intellectual Seifuku Tuneya’s Colonization Discourse at the end of the 19th Century
Korean Studies Quarterly / Korean Studies Quarterly, (P)2671-8197; (E)2733-936X
2022, v.45 no.2, pp.169-204
https://doi.org/10.25024/ksq.45.2.202206.169
Kim,Sung-Hyun,
(2022). Japanese Intellectual Seifuku Tuneya’s Colonization Discourse at the end of the 19th Century. , 45(2), 169-204, https://doi.org/10.25024/ksq.45.2.202206.169
- Downloaded
- Viewed
Abstract
In this article, I reconsider the activities and writings of Seifuku Tsuneya from a point of view of colonization discourse in the 1890s. Specifically, it considered the changes in the description of colonization based on Kaigai syokumin‒ron and Josoen kaika‒shi. Through Kaigai syokumin‒ron Tsuneya insisted on expansion of Japanese market overseas in response to the world situation in the 19th century and overseas colonization to solve domestic economic and social problems. After the Sino‒Japanese War, he stayed in Joseon and wrote Josoen kaika‒shi in consideration of the confrontation between Russia and Japan. It was intended to define aspects of Joseon’s geography, race, culture, and history on the basis of Japan’s national interests. Tsuneya replaces history with the rise and fall of the species, and reconstructs the facts of migration and colonization that developed in the Joseon. Through that, he sought to materialize the image of blood control and dependence on foreign powers for the ethnicity and history of the Joseon Dynasty, to derive the validity and legitimacy of Japan’s domination of Joseon internally, and to strengthen development and invasion of Joseon. In the late 19th century, Japanese society openly claimed that Joseon was a profit line in response to the global situation and tried to establish a logic that affirms the rule of Joseon. In response, Tsuneya claimed the history of Japanese colonization of Joseon under the premise of Japanese Shares Ancestors with Koreans, justifying Japan’s control of Joseon. In the process, he explains through the term colonialization that the Japanese did not simply migrate to Joseon, but historically dominated it. The term colonialization was changed to a term related to colonialism.
- keywords
- Tsuneya Seifuku, Kaigai Syokuminron, Chōsen Kaika‒shi, Colonization Discourse, 쓰네야 세이후쿠(恒屋盛服), 해외식민론, 조선개화사, 식민론
Reference
1
靑華山人(저), 近藤真鋤(역), 『朝鮮八域誌』. 東京: 日就社, 1881.
2
恒屋盛服, 『海外殖民論』. 東京: 博聞社, 1891.
3
恒屋盛服, ｢メキシコ國烈翁鐵山紀行｣. 『東京地學協會報告』 14년 8･9호, 1893.
4
恒屋盛服, ｢墨西哥國探検話｣ 전2회. 『東京地學協會報告』 14년 10‒11호, 1893.
5
恒屋盛服, ｢朝鮮半島殖民ノ必要｣. 『殖民協會報告』 51호, 1897.
6
恒屋盛服, ｢韓国二於ケル日本人｣. 『殖民時報』 71호, 1899.
7
恒屋盛服, ｢朝鮮殖民問題ノ性質｣. 『殖民時報』 74호, 1900.
8
恒屋盛服, ｢朝鮮種族談｣ 전3회. 『地學雜誌』, 11집 11호･12집 1‒2호, 1899~1900.
9
恒屋盛服, 『朝鮮開化史』. 東京: 博文館, 1901.
10
星野恒, ｢本邦人種言語ニ付鄙考ヲ述テ世ノ真心愛国者ニ質ス｣. 『史学会雑誌』 11號, 1890.
11
重野安繹･久米邦武･星野恒 編, 『稿本國史眼』 전7권. 東京: 大成館, 1890.
12
榊時敏 編, 『福島県名士列伝: 一名･衆議院議員候補者略伝 前編』. 福島: 福島活版舎, 1890.
13
吉田東伍, ｢古代半島諸国興廃概考｣. 『史学会雑誌』 21号, 1891.
14
吉田東伍, 『日韓古史断』. 東京: 富山房書店, 1893.
15
参謀本部編纂課 譯輯, 『各国貨幣度量訳字例』. 参謀本部, 1891.
16
金田楢太郎, ｢人事地理學考｣. 『地學雜誌』 7집 82권, 1895.
17
金田楢太郎, ｢人事地理學考(承前)｣. 『地學雜誌』 7집 83권, 1896.
18
金田楢太郎, ｢人事地理學考(第八十三卷の續)｣. 『地學雜誌』 8집 86권, 1896.
19
菊池謙譲, 『朝鮮王国』. 東京: 民友社, 1896.
20
坪谷善四郞, ｢國民的膨脹 移民｣. 『太陽』 7‒14, 1901.
21
新聞集成明治編年史編纂会 編, 『新聞集成明治編年史』. 東京: 林泉社, 1936.
22
大植四郎 編, 『国民過去帳 明治之巻』. 大阪: 尚古房, 1935.
23
東亞同文會內對支功勞者傳記編贊會 編, 『對支回顧錄』 下卷. 東京 : 對支功勞者傳記編贊會, 1936.
24
黒竜会 編, 『東亞先覺志士記傳』 下卷. 東京: 黒竜会出版部, 1936.
25
에드워드 사이드(저), 박홍규(역), 『오리엔탈리즘』. 서울: 교보문고, 2015.
26
유본예(저), 장지연(역해), 『한경지략: 19세기 서울의 풍경과 풍속』. 경기: 아카넷, 2020.
27
角山幸洋, 『榎本武揚とメキシコ殖民移住』. 東京: 同文舘出版, 1986.
28
児玉正昭, 『『殖民協会報告』解説･総目次･索引』. 東京: 不二出版, 1987.
29
淺田喬二, 『日本植民地硏究史論』. 東京: 未來社, 1990.
30
阪田安雄 監修, 『日系移民資料集 北米編』 全18巻. 東京: 日本図書センタ一, 1991.
31
上野久, 『メキシコ榎本殖民: 榎本武揚の理想と現実』. 東京: 中央公論社, 1994.
32
神繁司, 『移民ビブリオグラフィ一: 書誌でみる北米移民研究』. 東京: クロスカルチャ一出版, 2011.
33
김성현, ｢19세기 말 동경지학협회의 활동과 조선 지리 인식｣. 한국학중앙연구원 박사학위논문, 2021.
34
박양신, ｢1920년대 일본의 인구문제와 이식민론(移植民論)｣. 『동북아역사논총』 65, 2019, 273~311쪽.
35
조동걸, ｢식민사학의 성립과 심화｣. 『한민족독립운동사』 5권, 국사편찬위원회, 1989, http://db.history.go.kr/id/hdsr_005_0030_0050_0010쪽.
36
최혜주, ｢메이지(明治)시대의 한일관계 인식과 日鮮同祖論｣. 『한국민족운동사연구』 37, 2003, 161~203쪽.
37
최혜주, ｢일본 殖民協會의 식민 활동과 해외이주론｣. 『숭실사학』 30, 2013, 173~213쪽.
38
福島新吾, ｢明治期における植民主義の形成｣. 『思想』 511, 1967, pp. 85~98.
39
阿部洋 외, ｢東アジアの教育近代化に果した日本人の役割:お雇い日本人教習と中国･朝鮮｣. 『日本比較教育学会紀要』 1982巻 8号, 1982, pp. 51~58.
40
稲葉継雄, ｢京城学堂について:旧韓末｢日語学校｣の一事例｣. 『日本の教育史学』 29巻, 1986, pp. 76~94.
41
西川潤, ｢フランス第三共和制の植民地政策: ルロワ ボ一リュ一とジュ一ル･フエリィ｣. 『社会 経済史学』 52巻 2号, 1986, pp. 222~243.
42
千葉功, ｢満韓不可分論満韓交換論の形成と多角的同盟･協商網の模索｣. 『史学雑誌』 105巻 7号, 1996, pp. 620~655.
43
柳瀬善治, ｢明治大正期の植民地思想形成への一試論: ポ一ル･ルロア＝ボ一リュ一受容の諸相｣. 『三重大学日本語学文学』 13권, 2002, pp. 67~93.
44
日比嘉高, ｢移民の想像力: 渡米言説と文学テクストのビジョン｣. 『JunCture』 1, 2010, pp. 48~63.
Other articles from this issue
- A Study on Kim Il-Sung’s Kyosi and Kim Jong-Il’s Malsseum in the Parts from Foreword to Balhae and Silla of 『Chosun History』(High School Textbook of North Korea)
- North Korean Historical Narrative and Recognition on the Second Manchu Invasion of 1636 in 1970~1980
- From Science to Literature: Changes in the Education on the History of Anti‒Japanese Armed Struggle in North Korea in the 1950s and Early 1960s
- An Essay on a Humanities Data Processing
- Japanese Intellectual Seifuku Tuneya’s Colonization Discourse at the end of the 19th Century
- A Study on the Making of Russian Colonization Policy for the Korean People from 1863 to 1866
- Study on the Shinshukyo’s Missionary Form in Korea During the Period of Residency General
- more
Recommanded Articles
This website recommended the use the Chrome browser for journal website.