바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기
 

Korean Journal of Health Psychology

  • KOREAN
  • P-ISSN1229-070X
  • E-ISSN2713-9581
  • KCI

The Effects of the Index of Greenness Simulation Based on Restorative Environment Model upon Emotion Improvement

Korean Journal of Health Psychology / Korean Journal of Health Psychology, (P)1229-070X; (E)2713-9581
2007, v.12 no.2, pp.439-465
https://doi.org/10.17315/kjhp.2007.12.2.009

Reference

1.

목정훈 (2005). 서울의 도시경관에 대한 시민인식과 정책적 시사점. 서울연구포커스, 32, 1-9.

2.

박광배 (1994). 너무 작은 설명변량에 대한 몇 가지 해결책: 중다회귀분석의 경우. 한국심리학회지, 13(1), 1-20.

3.

생태도시센터 (n.d.). 생태도시란? http://ecocity. or.kr/ channel_01/index.html 에서 2006, 4, 27 인출.

4.

서울그린트러스트 (n.d.). 서울의 녹지현실. http:// sgt.or.kr/data/data-1.html 에서 2004, 11, 22 인출.

5.

서울시 푸른도시국 (n.d.). 일반현황. http://www. seoul.go.kr/info/organ/subhomepage/green/data/general/1219831_12684.html 에서 2006, 4, 27 인출.

6.

엄붕훈, 우형택 (1997). 쾌적환경 평가를 통한 지각환경의 질(PEQI) 평가 모델에 관한 연구 (대구 경북지역을 대상으로). 한국환경과학회지, 6(6), 563-578.

7.

이승훈 (2007). 녹시율(綠視率)의 정서증진효과에 대한 모델 비교. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 12(1), 189-217.

8.

이승훈, 현명호 (2003a). 한국판 회복환경지각척도의 요인구조. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 8(2), 229-241.

9.

이승훈, 현명호 (2003b). 회복환경의 스트레스 완화효과. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 8(3), 525-545.

10.

이승훈, 현명호 (2004). 자연환경과 회복환경의 스트레스 완화효과 비교. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 9(3), 609-632.

11.

이유정 (1994). 성격특질이 기분의 수준 및 변화성에 미치는 영향. 중앙대학교 박사학위논문.

12.

조용현 (2003). 서울시 가로 녹시율 증진방안. 서울시정개발연구원 기본연구보고서 (시정연 2003 - R - 10).

13.

조용현 (2004, 8, 1a). 가로에서 시민의 눈으로 직접 느낄 수 있는 식물의 양인 '녹시율'을 22%까지 높여야. http://www.sdi.re.kr/ 에서 2004, 11, 21 인출.

14.

조용현 (2004, 8, 1b). 일본의 가로 녹시율 증진 시책. http://www.sdi.re.kr/ 에서 2004, 11, 21 인출.

15.

한국경제 (2005, 3, 24). 성냥갑 도시… '어메니티' 키우자. http://hksearch.hankyung.com/cgi-bin/ searchView.cgi?pg 에서 2005, 3, 24 인출.

16.

Allen, J. G., & Haccoun, D. M. (1976). Sex differences in emotionality: A multidimensional approach. Human Relations, 29(8), 711-722.

17.

Bell, P. A., Greene, T. C., Fisher, J. D., & Baum, A. (2003). 환경심리학 [Environmental psychology (5th Ed.)]. (이진환과 홍기원 역). 서울: 시그마프레스. (원전은 2001에 출판)

18.

Bowler, P. A., Kaiser, F. G., & Hartig, T. (1999). A role for ecological restoration work in university environmental education. Journal of Environmental Education, 30(4), 19-26.

19.

Brown, T. C., & Daniel, T. C. (1989). Effect of changes in streamflow on scenic quality: The case of the Cache La Poudre River. Final Report A. Fort Collins, CO: USDA Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station.

20.

Brown, T. C., & Daniel, T. C. (1991). Landscape aesthetics of riparian environments: Relationship of flow quantity to scenic quality along a wild and scenic river. Water Resources Research, 27, 1787-1795.

21.

Chiesura, A. (2004). The role of urban parks for the sustainable city. Landscape and Urban Planning, 68(1), 129-138.

22.

Cimprich, B. E. (1990). Attentional fatigue and restoration in individuals with cancer. Doctoral Dissertation. University of Michigan. USA.

23.

Cimprich, B. E. (1992a). A theoretical perspective on attention and patient education. Advances in Nursing Science, 14(3), 39-51.

24.

Cimprich, B. E. (1993). Development of an intervention to restore attention in cancer patients. Cancer Nursing, 16(2), 83-92.

25.

Cimprich, B. E. (1998). Age and extent of surgery affect attention in women treated for breast cancer. Research in Nursing & Health, 21(3), 229-238.

26.

Cohen, S. (1978). Environmental load and the allocation of attention. In A. Baum, J. Singer, & S. Valins (Eds.), Advances in Environmental Psychology (Vol. 1) (pp. 1-29). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

27.

Cohen, S. (1980). Aftereffects of stress on human performance and social behavior: A review of research and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 88(1), 82-108.

28.

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1999). 몰입의 즐거움 [Finding flow]. (이희재 역). 서울: 해냄 출판사. (원전은 1997에 출판)

29.

Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Larson, R. (1987). Validity and reliability of the experience-sampling method. Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease, 175(9), 526-536.

30.

Csikszentmihalyi, M., & LeFevre, J. (1989). Optimal experience in work and leisure. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 56(5), 815-822.

31.

Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Rathunde, K. (1993). The measurement of flow in everyday life: Toward a theory of emergent motivation. In J. E. Jacobs (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation, 1992: Developmental perspectives on motivation (Vol. 40) (pp. 57-97). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.

32.

Evans, G. W., & Lepore, S. J. (1997). Moderating and mediating processes in environment-behavior research. In G. T. Moore & R. W. Marans (Eds.), Advances in environment, behavior, and design, Vol. 4: Toward the integration of theory, methods, research, and utilization. (pp. 255-285). NY: Plenum Press.

33.

Fredrikson, M., Annas, P., Fischer, H., & Wik, G. (1996). Gender and age differences in the prevalence of specific fears and phobias. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 34(1), 33-39.

34.

Frumkin, H. (2001). Beyond toxicity: Human health and the natural environment. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 20(3), 234-240.

35.

Hartig, T. (1993). Nature experience in transactional perspective. Landscape & Urban Planning, 25, 17-36.

36.

Hartig, T., Evans, G. W., Jamner, L. D., Davis, D. S., & Gärling, T. (2003). Tracking restoration in natural and urban field settings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23(2), 109-123.

37.

Hartig, T., Kaiser, F. G., & Bowler, P. A. (1997). Further development of a measure of perceived environmental restorativeness (Working Paper No. 5). Gavle, Sweden: Institute for Housing Research, Uppsala University.

38.

Hartig, T., Kaiser, F. G., & Bowler, P. A. (2001). Psychological restoration in nature as a positive motivation for ecological behavior. Environment & Behavior, 33(4), 590-607.

39.

Hartig, T., Korpela, K., Evans, G., & Gärling, T. (1997). A measure of restorative quality in environments. Scandinavian Housing & Planning Research, 14, 175-194.

40.

Hartig, T., Mang, M., & Evans, G. W. (1991). Restorative effects of natural environment experiences. Environment & Behavior, 23(1), 3-26.

41.

Hartig, T., Nyberg, L., Nilsson, L., & Gärling, T. (1999). Testing for mood congruent recall with environmentally induced mood. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19(4), 353-367.

42.

Herzog, T. R., Black, A. M., Fountaine, K. A., & Knotts, D. J. (1997). Reflection and attentional recovery as distinctive benefits of restorative environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 17(2), 165-170.

43.

Herzog, T. R., Maguire, C. P., & Nebel, M. B. (2003). Assessing the restorative components of environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23(2), 159-170.

44.

Hubbard, P. J. (1992). Environment-behavior studies and city design: A new agenda for research? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 12, 269-279.

45.

Hull, R. B., & Stewart, W. P. (1992). Validity of photo-based scenic beauty judgments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 12(2), 101-114.

46.

Jackson, L. E. (2003). The relationship of urban design to human health and condition. Landscape and Urban Planning, 64(4), 191-200.

47.

Jansen, D. A. (1997). Attentional demands and restorative activities: Do they influence directed attention among the elderly? Doctoral Dissertation. University of Wisconsin, Madison. USA.

48.

Kaplan, R. (1983). The role of nature in the urban context. In I. Altman & J. F. Wohlwill (Eds.), Behavior and the natural environment (pp. 127-161). New York: Plenum.

49.

Kaplan, R. (1993). The role of nature in the context of the workplace. Landscape and Urban Planning, 26, 193-201.

50.

Kaplan, R. (2001). The nature of the view from home: Psychological benefits. Environment & Behavior, 33(4), 507-542.

51.

Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.

52.

Kaplan, R., Kaplan, S., & Ryan, R. L. (2001). 인간중심적 자연환경의 설계 [With people in mind: Design and management of everyday nature]. (김봉원과 김유일 역). 서울: 태림문화사. (원전은 1998에 출판)

53.

Kaplan, S. (1993). The role of natural environment aesthetics in the restorative experience. In P. H. Gobster (Ed.), Managing urban and high-use recreation settings (pp. 46-49). St. Paul, MN: Forest Service, USDA. General Technical Report NC-163.

54.

Kaplan, S. (1995). The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15(3), 169-182.

55.

Kaplan, S., Bardwell, L. V., & Slakter, D. B. (1993). The museum as a restorative environment. Environment & Behavior, 25(6), 725-742.

56.

Kaplan, S., & Peterson, C. (1993). Health and environment: A psychological analysis. Landscape and Urban Planning, 26, 17-23.

57.

Kaplan, S., & Talbot, J. F. (1983). Psychological benefits of a wilderness experience. In I. Altman & J. F. Wohlwill (Eds.), Human behavior and environment (Vol. 6) (pp. 163-203). New York, NY: Plenum.

58.

Korpela, K. M., Hartig, T., Kaiser, F. G., & Fuhrer, U. (2001). Restorative experience and self-regulation in favorite places. Environment & Behavior, 33(4), 572-589.

59.

Kuo, F. E., Bacaicoa, M., & Sullivan, W. C. (1998). Transforming inner-city landscapes: Trees, sense of safety, and preference. Environment & Behavior, 30(1), 28-59.

60.

Laumann, K., Gärling, T., & Stormark, K. M. (2001). Rating scale measures of restorative components of environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21(1), 31-44.

61.

Lawrence, R. J. (2000). Urban health: A new agenda? Reviews on environmental health, 15(1-2), 1-11.

62.

Lawrence, R. J. (2002). Healthy residential environments. In R. B. Bechtel & A. Churchman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (pp. 394-412). NY: John Wiley & Sons.

63.

Lepore, S. J., & Evans, G. W. (1996). Coping with multiple stressors in the environment. In M. Zeidner & S. Norman (Eds.), Handbook of coping: Theory, research, applications (pp. 350-377). Oxford, England: John Wiley & Sons.

64.

Marsella, A. J., Wandersman, A., & Cantor, D. W. (1998). Psychology and urban initiatives: Professional and scientific opportunities and challenges. American Psychologist, 53(6), 621-623.

65.

McClelland, G. H., & Judd, C. M. (1993). Statistical difficulties of detecting interactions and moderator effects. Psychological Bulletin, 114(2), 376-390.

66.

Palmer, J. F., & Hoffman, R. E. (2001). Rating reliability and representation validity in scenic landscape assessments. Landscape and Urban Planning, 54, 149-161.

67.

Peck, E. Y. (2000). Gender differences in film-induced fear as a function of type of emotion measure and stimulus content: A meta-analysis and laboratory study. Doctoral Dissertation. University of Wisconsin, Madison. USA.

68.

Pitt, D. G., & Zube, E. H. (1987). Management of natural environments. In D. Stokols & I. Altman (Eds.), Handbook of Environmental Psychology (Vol. 2) (pp. 1009-1036). New York: John Wiley.

69.

Purcell, A. T., Lamb, R. J., Peron, E. M., & Falchero, S. (1994). Preference or preferences for landscape? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 14(3), 195-209.

70.

Purcell, A. T., Peron, E. M., & Berto, R. (2001). Why do preferences differ between scene types? Environment & Behavior, 33(1), 93-106.

71.

Rivlin, L. G. (2000). Reflections on the assumptions and foundations of work in environmental psychology. In S. Wapner, J. Demick, T. Yamamoto, & H. Minami (Eds.), Theoretical perspectives in environment-behavior research: Underlying assumptions, research problems, and methodologies (pp. 51-59). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

72.

Scott, M. J., & Canter, D. V. (1997). Picture or place? A multiple sorting study of landscape. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 17(4), 263-281.

73.

Sommer, R., & Summit, J. (1995). An exploratory study of preferred tree form. Environment & Behavior, 27(4), 540-557.

74.

Staats, H., Kieviet, A., & Hartig, T. (2003). Where to recover from attentional fatigue: An expectancy-value analysis of environmental preference. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23(2), 147-157.

75.

Taylor, A. F., Kuo, F. E., & Sullivan, W. C. (2001). Coping with ADD: The surprising connection to green play settings. Environment & Behavior, 33(1), 54-77.

76.

Tennessen, C. M., & Cimprich, B. E. (1995). Views to nature: Effects on attention. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15(1), 77-85.

77.

Tress, B., & Tress, G. (2001). Capitalising on multiplicity: A transdisciplinary systems approach to landscape research. Landscape and Urban Planning, 57, 143-157.

78.

Tress, B., Tress, G., Decamps, H., & d'Hauteserre, A. (2001). Bridging human and natural sciences in landscape research. Landscape and Urban Planning, 57, 137-141.

79.

Ulrich, R. S. (1986). Human responses to vegetation and landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 13, 29-44.

80.

Ulrich, R. S., Simons, R. F., Losito, B. D., Fiorito, E., Miles, M. A., & Zelson, M. (1991). Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 11(3), 201-230.

81.

van Kamp, I., Leidelmeijer, K., Marsman, G., & de Hollander, A. (2003). Urban environmental quality and human well-being Towards a conceptual framework and demarcation of concepts; A literature study. Landscape and Urban Planning, 65, 5-18.

82.

van den Berg, A. E., Koole, S. L., & van der Wulp, N. Y. (2003). Environmental preference and restoration: (How) are they related? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23(2), 135-146.

83.

Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063-1070.

84.

Wells, N. M. (2000). At home with nature: Effects of “greenness” on children's cognitive functioning. Environment & Behavior, 32(6), 775-795.

85.

Wilson, E. O. (1984). Biophilia: The human bond with other species. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

86.

Wilson, E. O. (1993). Biophilia and the conservation ethic. In S. R. Kellert & E. O. Wilson (Eds.), The biophilia hypothesis (pp. 31-41). Washington, DC: Island Press.

87.

Wilson, E. O. (2001). Nature matters. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 20(3), 241-242.

Korean Journal of Health Psychology