The object of this study is to compare qualitative level between Korean academic books and American academic ones evaluated by faculty members in Korea. To achieve this study, the data were produced by the questionnaires from faculty members of the Chonbuk National University. The major conclusions are summarized as follows: 1. As a whole, American academic books are evaluated more excellent than Korean academic ones. American academic books have more appropriateness of citation, level of content completion, usefulness of content, clearness of expression and accuracy of data than Korean academic ones 2. This study shows that American academic books are evaluated more excellent than Korean academic ones in every subject. 3. The respondents who had studied in the United States of America for more than two years evaluate American academic books more excellent than those for less than two years. 4. Regardless of the periods of study in America, however, most of respondents evaluate American academic books better than Korean academic ones in all fields.
연세대학교 연구처. 새논문작성법.
American Psychological Association. (1994). Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association. .
고려대학교 출판부. 논문작성법.
이회여대 출판부. 연구방법과 논문작성법.
(2003). . 한국문헌정보학회지, 37(1), 227-243.
Glogoff. (1988). . Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 39(6), 400-407. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(198811)39:6<400::AID-ASI3>3.0.CO;2-Q.
(1995). . College & Research Libraries, 56(7), 297-298.
한국도서관정보학회. (2001). 한국도서관정보학회지. .