바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기
 

Journal Of Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science

  • P-ISSN1229-2435
  • E-ISSN2799-4767
  • KCI

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.14 No.1

PDF Citation Share

An Analysis of the Discriminating Power of Medical Journal Evaluation Criteria

Journal Of Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science / Journal Of Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, (P)1229-2435; (E)2799-4767
2003, v.14 no.1, pp.199-218
이춘실
이춘실, (2003). An Analysis of the Discriminating Power of Medical Journal Evaluation Criteria. , 14(1), 199-218.

Abstract

The discriminating power of journal evaluation criteria of Korean medical journals were measured. The study used the data of 76 medical journals, collected in the "Korean Medical Journal Evaluation" process conducted by the Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors (KAMJE) between 1997 and 1999. For each evaluation criterion, the distribution of the individual score vs the total score of a journal received was plotted and their correlations were analyzed. It is found that the evaluation criteria with a high discriminating power are the ones associated with the peer review system and the journal editing. The evaluation criteria with a low discriminating power are the journal frequency and how often a chief editor is changed. Some evaluation criteria such as "Journal holding rates of medical libraries" and "year-end index" need modifications in the evaluation methods. Other evaluation criteria such as "Journal self-citation rate","SCI citation rate" and "SCI impact factor" need to modify the score ranges. It is recommended that the new evaluation criteria such as "citation rate by Korean medical journals" and "Access availability of the journal information through major Korean medical abstract databases" should be added.formation through major Korean medical abstract databases" should be added.dded.

keywords
학술지 평가지표, 평가지표의 변별력, 의학학술지

Reference

1.

대한의학학술지편집인협의회. 대한의학학술지편집인협의회 소식.

2.

대한의학학술지편집인협의회. 의학학술지 평가현황.

3.

한국학술진흥재단. 국내학술지 평가기준에 관한 공청회 발표자료.

4.

한국학술진흥재단. 국내학술지 평가.

5.

한국학술진흥재단. 학술지 자체평가서 양식.

6.

Garfield, E.. How ISI Selects Journals for Coverage: Quantitative and Qualitative Con-siderations.

7.

(2000). . Croat Med J, 41(4), 368-374.

8.

(1998). . Rev Invest Clin, 50(6), 497-504.

9.

(1998). . Physioligist, 41(3), 113-115.

10.

ISI. The ISI Database: The Journal Selection Process.

11.

대한의학학술지편집인협의회. 제 7차 의학학술지 평가 결과.

12.

(1996). . Br Med J, 313(7054), 411-413.

13.

(1997). . 대한의학학술지편집인협의회소식, 5, 7-14.

14.

대한의학회 한국의학학술지 인용색인정보 개발사업단. 한국의학학술지 인용정보.

15.

대한의학학술지편집인협의회. 국내 의학학술지 평가기준.

16.

(1999). . CMAJ, 161(8), 979-980.

17.

대한의학회 한국의학학술지 인용색인정보 개발사업단. 한국의학학술지 인용정보.

18.

(1999). . 대한의사협회지, 42(4), 330-333.

19.

(1996). . The Significant Scientific Literature Appears in a Small Core of Journals, 10(17).

20.

NLM. Fact sheet: Journal Selection for Index Medicus/MEDLINE.

21.

한국의학도서관협의회. 의학관계잡지종합목록.

22.

(1996). . Trop Med & Int Health, 1(6), 739-752.

23.

조승열. 의학학술지 평가사업의 배경 및 취지.

24.

한국학술진홍재단. 학술활동 지원.

25.

대한의학학술지편집인협의회. 의학 분야 색인 · 초록 데이터베이스의 학술지 선정 방침.

Journal Of Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science

e-Submission OA Policy