바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기
 

Journal Of Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science

  • P-ISSN1229-2435
  • E-ISSN2799-4767
  • KCI

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.15 No.2

PDF Citation Share

A Comparison of Ontology Languages: Focusing on W3C OWL and ISO Topic Maps

Journal Of Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science / Journal Of Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, (P)1229-2435; (E)2799-4767
2004, v.15 no.2, pp.71-96
Oh, Sam-Gyun
Oh,, S. (2004). A Comparison of Ontology Languages: Focusing on W3C OWL and ISO Topic Maps. , 15(2), 71-96.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to describe major concepts related to W3C OWL and ISO Topic Maps and to provide the result of comparison and analysis regarding semantic expression power between two ontology languages. This paper is comprised of the following parts: 1) describing URI and namespace concepts that are fundamental building block of effective ontology construction; 2) offering detailed explanation of major Topic Map concepts such as topics, associations, and occurrences; 3) providing how to accomplish the second purpose of cataloging(grouping related items when displaying the search result) using Topic Map; and 4) finally explaining the difference between two ontology languages in terms of semantic expression power.

keywords
온톨리지, 토픽맵

Reference

1.

(2003). 연관 저록의 구조적 접근을 위한 목록 체계 구축 및 평가에 관한 연구: 객체지향적 접근. 한국문헌정보학회, 37(3), 15-34.

2.

Four Uses of a URL: Name, Concept, Web Location and Document Instance.

3.

Identity Crisis.

4.

Disabiguating RDF Identifiers.

5.

Namespace Policy for the Dublin Core Metadata Initiative (DCMI).

6.

An introduction to the Resource Description Framework.

7.

(2004). Metadata? Thesaurus? Texanomies, Topic Maps?: Making sense of it all . XML 2004 Conference and Exposition.

8.

Namespaces in XML.

9.

Dublin Core Qualiers in RDF.

10.

(2002). The XML Papers: Lessons Learned on Applying Topic Maps . XML 2002 Conference and Exposition.

11.

12.

(2003). Building ontologies in DAML + OIL. Comparative and Functional Genomics, 4(1), 134-141.

13.

What do HTTP URIs Identify?.

14.

Web Ontology Language(OWL) Guide Version 1.0.

15.

오삼균;. (2002). 시맨틱웹 기술과 활용방안. 정보관리학회지, 19(4), 298-319. 10.3743/KOSIM.2002.19.4.298.

16.

Curing the Web's Identity Crisis: Subject Indicators for RDF.

17.

국가 URN기반 UCI 식별체계의 식별메타데이터 연구.

18.

(2004). Toward seamless knowledge: integrating public sector portals in Norway . XML 2004 Conference and Exposition.

Journal Of Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science

e-Submission OA Policy