바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기
 

logo

  • P-ISSN1229-2435
  • E-ISSN2799-4767
  • KCI

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.18 No.2

PDF Citation Share

Web Accessibility Evaluation of Cultural Contents in Korea

Journal Of Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science / Journal Of Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, (P)1229-2435; (E)2799-4767
2007, v.18 no.2, pp.125-140
https://doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2007.18.2.125
Hwang, Dong-Ryul
Hwang,, D. (2007). Web Accessibility Evaluation of Cultural Contents in Korea. , 18(2), 125-140, https://doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2007.18.2.125

Abstract

Cultural contents should provide all the people web services to ensure accessibility without any obstacles as a core resource of nation including a code linking people and people beyond time and space. This study achieved that automated measure including 11 checkpoints and manual analysis including 11 criteria and 26 checkpoints of three areas in selected five web sites such as Culture Portal. Art Road, Korean Patterns, MFM, and e-Museum supported by Ministry of Culture & Tourism. As a result, web accessibility level of cultural contents analyzed it staying at the beginning level. This study Provided the directions in order to improve accessibility of cultural contents through showing real cases to practice for improving web accessibility.

keywords
문화 콘텐츠, 웹 접근성, 접근성 평가, 자동화된 평가, 카도와, 보편적 서비스

Reference

1.

(2005). . 한국문헌정보학회, 39(2), 237-258.

2.

웹 접근성 연구소. <http://www.iabf.or.kr/Lab/Pds/PdsView.asp?board=dataroom&bseq=130>.

3.

정보통신부. 인터넷 웹 콘텐츠 접근성 지침.

4.

Weisen;Marcus(et al). Web Accessibility Revealed: The Museums.

5.

현준호;김석일. 국내외 행정기관의 웹 접근성 준수 실태 및 개선 방안.

6.

Carey;Kevin. Accessibility: The Current Situation and New Directions.

7.

(2006). . 한국비블리아학회지, 17(2), 43-64.

8.

Fidgeon;Tim. Usability for older web users.

9.

ISO. Standards for Multimedia.

10.

Thatcher;Jim(et al). Constructing Accessible Web Sites.

11.

內田齊. (2002). J - WASおよび總務省實証實驗のご案內 .

12.

Moss;Trenton. Accessibility audit vs. accessibility testing.

13.

W3C. Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0..

14.

Canadian Cultural Online Program. Canadian Heritage Standards and Guidelines for Digitalization Project.

15.

Moss;Trenton. (2007). The future of web accessibility. .

Journal Of Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science

e-Submission OA Policy