바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기
 

Journal Of Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science

  • P-ISSN1229-2435
  • E-ISSN2799-4767
  • KCI

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.20 No.2

PDF Citation Share

A Study on a Revised Conspectus Model for the Assessment of Electronic Resources

Journal Of Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science / Journal Of Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, (P)1229-2435; (E)2799-4767
2009, v.20 no.2, pp.31-44
https://doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2009.20.2.031
Chang, D.H.
Chang,, D. (2009). A Study on a Revised Conspectus Model for the Assessment of Electronic Resources. , 20(2), 31-44, https://doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2009.20.2.031

Abstract

The conspectus, based on a set number of subject descriptors derived essentially from LC subject classifications, provides a consistent framework within which libraries could report subject intensity. While library collection development has been benefitted by using this conspectus, its effectiveness in this digital era is under controversy. The purpose of this study is to survey the concepts and the various types of conspectus in library collection development and to test the applicability of a revised conspectus model to electronic resource management in libraries. For this, the focus was especially put on investigating the characteristics of electronic resources as considered the collection depth usually identified in collection development policies. Previous research has been also surveyed to consolidate their outcomes in order to design a matrix model of conspectus, which put the characteristics, persistence, and collection level in consideration in oder for the design of the conspectus model.

keywords
장서개발, 장서평가, 자료선정, 장서개발정책, 컨스펙터스, 전자자원

Reference

1.

(1998). 컨스펙터스방법을 이용한 장서평가 연구. 정보관리학회지, 15(2), 163-191.

2.

Embracing Electronic Access: Renovating Conspectus for the Digital Era. National Initiatives and Collaboration Branch, National Library of Australia presented at the VALA Conference, Melbourne, 28th-30th, January, 1998.

3.

(2002). Linking collection management policy to metadata for preservation (35-43). Proceedings of International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata for e-Communication.

4.

(2004). The decisionmaking process in conspectus evaluation of collections. Library Quarterly, 74(2), 181-205. 10.1086/382846.

5.

Renovating Conspectus for the Digital Era: Applied at Queensland University of Technology. Australian Libraries Gateway(ALG): Embracing Electronic Access, NLA.

6.

(2002). Updating conspectus for a digital age. Library Collections. Acquisitions & Technical Services, 26, 253-258. 10.1016/S1464-9055(02)00248-8.

7.

Developing library and information center collections.

8.

(1992). The conspectus: Possible process and useful product for the ordinary library;Collection assessment: A look at the RLG Conspectus. The Acquisitions Librarian, 7, 81-95.

9.

디지털시대의 장서관리.

10.

Fundamentals of Collection Development & Management.

11.

WLN Collection Assessment Manual.

12.

ARL Statistics 2005-06.

13.

Model for the recording of preservation and conservation activity (The Australian Conspectus, Information Sheet no. 9).

14.

(1994). Using the WLN conspectus in a nonautomated environment. Collection Building, 13(2-3), 69-82. 10.1108/eb023375.

15.

Using the Conspectus Method: A Collection Assessment Handbook.

16.

Cooperative collection management: The conspectus approach.

17.

Guidelines for a collection development policy using the conspectus model.

18.

(1988). The RLG Conspectus, Its Use and Benefits. College and Research Libraries, 49(2), 197-206.

Journal Of Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science

e-Submission OA Policy