바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기
 

Journal Of Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science

  • P-ISSN1229-2435
  • E-ISSN2799-4767
  • KCI

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.22 No.1

PDF Citation Share

Appraising the Interface Features of Web Search Engines Based on User-defined Relevance Criteria

Journal Of Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science / Journal Of Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, (P)1229-2435; (E)2799-4767
2011, v.22 no.1, pp.247-262
https://doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2011.22.1.247
Kim, Yang-Woo
Kim,, Y. (2011). Appraising the Interface Features of Web Search Engines Based on User-defined Relevance Criteria. , 22(1), 247-262, https://doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2011.22.1.247

Abstract

Although research has shown a significant amount of work identifying various dimensions of relevance along with exhaustive lists of relevance criteria, there seem to have been less effort to apply the findings to improve actual systems design. Based on this assumption, this paper investigates to what extent those relevance criteria have been incorporated into the interface features of major commercial Web search engines, suggesting what can/should be done more. Before stepping into the actual system features, this paper compares recent relevance research in Information Science with other human factor studies both in Information Science and its neighboring discipline (HCI), as an attempt to identify studies that are conceptually similar to the relevance research, but not named as such way. Similarities and differences between these studies are presented. Recommendations suggested to support applicable interface features include: 1) further personalization of interface designs; 2) author-supplied meta tags for the Web contents; and 3) extensions of beyond-topical representations based on link structure.

keywords
이용자연구, 적합성 기준, 인터페이스, 인간 컴퓨터 상호작용, 웹검색엔진

Reference

1.

2.

(1994). . Annual Reviews of Information Science and Technology (ARIST), 29, 3-48.

3.

(1990). . Information Processing & Management, 26(6), 755-776.

4.

(1997). . Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48(11), 970-986.

5.

6.

7.

(1997). . D-Lib Magazine, .

8.

9.

10.

(2009). . Journal of Documentation, 65(5), 719-744.

11.

(1998). . Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(2), 115-133.

12.

(1988). . The Indexer, 16(1), 3-6.

13.

(1999). . Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(12), 1051-1063.

14.

(2005). . Journal of Documentation, 62, 685-707.

15.

(1992). . Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 43(9), 602-615.

16.

17.

18.

19.

(2000). .

20.

(1998). . Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 33, 89-130.

21.

(1998). . Information Processing & Management, 34(5), 535-555.

22.

23.

(1993). . Library Quarterly, 63(3), 318-351.

24.

(1997). . Information Processing & Management, 33(3), 339-352.

25.

26.

(1996). .

27.

(1996). .

28.

(1997). .

29.

(1994). . Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45(3), 149-159.

30.

31.

32.

33.

(1993). .

34.

(1967). . Journal of Documentation, 23(4), 291-303.

35.

(1986). . Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 21, 3-33.

36.

(1994). . Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45(8), 572-576.

37.

(1994). . Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45(3), 124-134.

Journal Of Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science

e-Submission OA Policy