This paper provides suggestions for analyzing Cultural Objects Name Authority(CONA) developed by the Getty Trust and applying CONA to Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data(FRSAD). CONA is linked with the other Getty controlled vocabularies such as AAT, ULAN, and TGN, and can be linked with the library controlled vocabularies, such as LCSH. However, CONA has differences with library models since CONA is based on the art museum or art gallery. Therefore, we need to consider it when we link CONA to library standard models. The results discussed in this study have implications for analyzing CONA which provides access for cultural objects and applying it to the FRSAD, the subject authority model in library fields.
(2011). . Journal of Archival Organization, 9(3/4), 174-207. 10.1080/15332748.2011.650124.
(2010). . Art Documentation: bulletin of the Art Libraries Society of North America, 29(1), 67-72.
(2011). .
(2007). .
(2003). . Library Hi Tech, 21(2), 159-169. 10.1108/07378830310479802.
(2010). . International Cataloging & Bibliographic Control, 39(3), 53-56.
(2011). . 정보관리연구, 42(1), 113-135.
(2012). . 한국비블리아학회지, 23(1), 5-26.
(2003). . 정보관리학회지, 20(2), 113-134.
(2004). . 한국문헌정보학회지, 38(3), 201-219.