The historical, social, and cultural value of Internet resources is indisputable, therefore many national institutions have created Web archiving projects to hand down this heritage to future generations. The selection guidelines are the most crucial aspect of these projects because they aid in differentiating which resources are worth collecting and preserving from the large number of web resources available. The purpose of this study was to suggest improvements for the OASIS Selection Guidelines by analyzing the selection guidelines of other domestic and international Web archiving projects. First, based on the results of Web archiving projects abroad, we proposed improvements for the definition of Web data and other terms, the basic principles of the collection, collection methods, and collection cycle. Second, we proposed substantial improvements in the target resources for archiving, and also stated what kind of web resources must be excluded from Web archiving. Finally, we discussed the relationship between data collection methods and the legal deposit of online resources, the necessity of constructing a database for selected target materials, and the necessity of cooperative archiving policies.
(2011). . 한국콘텐츠학회논문지, 11(9), 9-16.
(2008). . 한국문헌정보학회지, 42(4), 159-179.
(2007). . 한국문헌정보학회지, 41(3), 5-24.
(2009). . 한국비블리아학회지, 20(2), 45-58.
(2010). . 한국기록관리학회지, 10(2), 147-170.
(2004). . 한국비블리아학회지, 15(1), 5-22.
(2003). . 情報管理學會誌, 20(1), 373-399.
(2008). . 情報管理學會誌, 25(4), 5-23.
(2011). . 정보관리연구, 42(3), 95-116.
(2010). . 한국문헌정보학회지, 44(2), 5-27.
(2002). . 한국기록관리학회지, 3(1), 111-127.
(2009). . 한국도서관.정보학회지, 40(1), 209-232.
(2005). . 한국문헌정보학회지, 39(2), 161-183.
(2001). . Journal of International Preservation News, 26, 10-12.
(2001). . Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(6), 499-507. 10.1002/asi.1081.