바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기
 

Journal Of Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science

  • P-ISSN1229-2435
  • E-ISSN2799-4767
  • KCI

A Study on Performance and Prediction Factors in College and University Libraries using Statistical Analyses

Journal Of Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science / Journal Of Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, (P)1229-2435; (E)2799-4767
2014, v.25 no.3, pp.191-214
https://doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2014.25.3.191
Kim, Giyeong
Choi, Yoonhee
Kang, Jaeyeon
Go, Pyeongjin

Abstract

The goal of this study is an exploratory statistical analysis of the university and college library statistics in the Academic Information Statistics System(rinfo.kr) governed of Korean Education and Research Information Service(KERIS) with performance measures based on sustainability. For the goal, we adopt a preprocessing method to develop change-rate variables by considering preceding predictive elements and succeeding performance elements, and to control external factors, such as size and socioeconomic factors. Then we execute a series of factor analyses and multiple linear regression analyses. 13 factors are extracted by the factor analyses and some sets of significant variables affecting the performance measures are identified through the regression analyses. Based on the results, we discuss the problem of out-lier and low correlation between variables. A suggestion for developing new variables is also discussed based on low effect sizes of the developed regression models. We hope that this study contributes to diffuse discussions on statistics system, evaluation, and further library management based on sustainability.

keywords
대학도서관통계, 지속가능성, 자원기반 성과요소, 외부변인 통제, 극단값, 성과기반 통계

Reference

1.

Martensen, Anne and Lars Grønholdt. (2003). Improving Library Users' Perceived Quality, Satisfaction and Loyalty: An Integrated Measurement and Management System. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 29(3), 140-147. 10.1016/S0099-1333(03)00020-X.

2.

Molyneux, Robert E.. (2008). Squeeze Play: Public Library Circulation and Budget Trends, FY1992. FY2004. Public Library Quarterly, 26(3/4), 101-107.

3.

Nelson, James A.. (2006). Marketing and Advocacy: Collaboration in Principle and Practice. Public Library Quarterly, 25(1/2), 117-135. 10.1300/J118v25n01_09.

4.

Tabachnick, Barbara G. and Linda S. Fidell. Using Multivariate Statistics.

5.

Weiner, Sharon A.. (2005). Library Quality and Impact: Is there a Relationship between New Measures and Traditional Measures?. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 31(5), 432-437. 10.1016/j.acalib.2005.05.004.

6.

Davis, Denise M.. (2007). The Status of Public Library Funding, 2003. 2005: Impact of Local Operating Revenue Fluctuation. Public Library Quarterly, 25(1.2), 5-26.

7.

Hernon, Peter and Robert D. E., Ed. by Peter Hernon, Robert E. Dugan, & Candy Schwartz. Future Directions in Outcomes Assessment. In Revisiting Outcomes Assessment in Higher Education.

8.

Hiller, Steve and James Self.. (2004). From Measurement to Management: Using Data Wisely for Planning and Decision-making. Library Trends, 53(1), 129-155.

9.

Holton, Barbara, Kaleen Vaden, and Williams Jeffrey. Academic Libraries: 2004: First Look.

10.

Ismail, Junaida, Aishah Musa, Mahadir Ladisma@Awis, and Sharunizam Shari. (2011). The Performance of Academic Libraries: A Case Study at Research University (Rus) in Malaysia. Global Journal of Human Social Science, 11(8), 19-23.

11.

ISO. ISO 2789:2013 Information and Documentation: International Library Statistics.

12.

Kim, Giyeong and So Young Yu.. (2011). An Exploratory Study to Develop an Alternative Model of Public Library Management using the Institute of Museum and Library Services' Public Library Statistics. The Library Quarterly, 81(4), 359-382. 10.1086/661656.

13.

Kim, Gi-Yeong;Choi, Yoon-Hee;. (2012). A Suggestion of Criteria for Categorizing Libraries into Types: Linking between Library and Information. Journal of the Korean Society for information Management, 29(1), 395-404. 10.3743/KOSIM.2012.29.1.395.

14.

Lancaster, F. Wilfrid.. If You Want to Evaluate Your Library.

15.

Liu, Yan Quan and Douglas L. Zweizig. (2001). The Use of National Public Library Statistics by Public Library Directors. Library Quarterly, 71(4), 467-497. 10.1086/603316.

16.

손정표;. (1994). 대학도서관 직원규모에 영향을 미치는 요인에 관한 연구. 한국도서관정보학회지, 21, 159-193.

17.

한국교육학술정보원. 2013 대학도서관 통계분석 자료집, 연구보고 CR 2013-16.

18.

양병훈;. (2008). 서울 소재 대학도서관 운영성과의 결정요인에 관한 실증연구 - 대출성과를 중심으로 -. 정보관리연구, 39(2), 163-184. 10.1633/JIM.2008.39.2.163.

19.

윤희윤;. (2001). 국내 대학도서관의 평가모형 개발에 관한 연구. 한국도서관정보학회지, 32(4), 45-75.

20.

최신 문헌정보학의 이해 편찬위원회. 최신 문헌정보학의 이해.

21.

Childers, Thomas., Ed. by Melvin J. Voigt. Statistics that Describe Libraries and Library Services;Advances in Librarianship, vol.5.

22.

Covey, Denise Troll.. Usage and Usability Assessment: Library Practices and Concerns.

23.

Crawford, John. Evaluation of Library and Information Services.

24.

Crawford, John. The Culture of Evaluation in Library and Information Services.

25.

도서관법. 법률 제11310호, 2012.2.27. 일부개정.

26.

김기영, 이재윤, 오경은. (2008). 한국 공공도서관 통계의 탐색적 분석 (111-116). 제15회 한국정보관리학회 학술대회 논문집.

27.

김기영, 최상기, 김주섭, 안혜림. (2014). 대학도서관평가 표준지표 개발에 관한 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 48(3), 303-334.

28.

김선애;. (2008). 대학도서관의 이용자만족도와 충성도에 관한 연구 - K대학도서관의 이용자를 대상으로 -. 한국문헌정보학회지, 42(3), 281-299. 10.4275/KSLIS.2008.42.3.281.

29.

백항기;이은철;. (2000). 대학도서관 서비스 질의 구성요인 분석. 한국문헌정보학회지, 34(4), 5-26.

Journal Of Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science