바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기
 

Journal Of Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science

  • P-ISSN1229-2435
  • E-ISSN2799-4767
  • KCI

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.25 No.4

PDF Citation Share

A Systematic Review on Concept-based Image Retrieval Research

Journal Of Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science / Journal Of Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, (P)1229-2435; (E)2799-4767
2014, v.25 no.4, pp.313-332
https://doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2014.25.4.313
Chung, EunKyung
Chung,, E. (2014). A Systematic Review on Concept-based Image Retrieval Research. , 25(4), 313-332, https://doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2014.25.4.313

Abstract

With the increased creation, distribution, and use of image in context of the development of digital technologies and internet, research endeavors have accumulated drastically. As two dominant aspects of image retrieval have been considered content-based and concept-based image retrieval, concept-based image retrieval has been focused in the field of Library and Information Science. This study aims to systematically review the accumulated research of image retrieval from the perspective of LIS field. In order to achieve the purpose of this study, two data sets were prepared: a total of 282 image retrieval research papers from Web of Science, and a total of 35 image retrieval research from DBpia in Kore for comparison. For data analysis, systematic review methodology was utilized with bibliographic analysis of individual research papers in the data sets. The findings of this study demonstrated that two sub-areas, image indexing and description and image needs and image behavior, were dominant. Among these sub-areas, the results indicated that there were emerging areas such as collective indexing, image retrieval in terms of multi-language and multi-culture environments, and affective indexing and use. For the user-centered image retrieval research, college and graduate students were found prominent user groups for research while specific user groups such as medical/health related users, artists, and museum users were found considerably. With the comparison with the distribution of sub-areas of image retrieval research in Korea, considerable similarities were found. The findings of this study expect to guide research directions and agenda for future.

keywords
이미지 검색, 체계적 분석, 의미기반, 이용자 중심, 리뷰

Reference

1.

Cawkell, A. E.. (1992). Selected Aspects of Image Processing and Management: Review and Future Prospects. Journal of Information Science, 18, 179-192. 10.1177/016555159201800303.

2.

Chen, H. L.. (2001). An Analysis of Image Retrieval Tasks in the Field of Art History. Information Processing & Management, 37(5), 701-720. 10.1016/S0306-4573(00)00049-2.

3.

Chu, H. (2001). Research in Image Indexing and Retrieval as Reflected in the Literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(12), 1011-1018. 10.1002/asi.1153.

4.

Chung, E. and J. Yoon. (2009). Categorical and Specificity Differences between User-Supplied Tags and Search Query Terms for Images: An Analysis of "Flickr" Tags and Web Image Search Queries [online]. Information Research: An International Electronic Journal, 14(3).

5.

Cooper, H. and L. V. Hedges. The handbook of research synthesis.

6.

Enser, P.. (2000). Visual Image Retrieval: Seeking the Alliance of Concept-Based and Content-Based Paradigms. Journal of Information Science, 26(4), 199-210. 10.1177/016555150002600401.

7.

Enser, P.. (2008). The Evolution of Visual Information Retrieval. Journal of Information Science, 34(4), 531-546. 10.1177/0165551508091013.

8.

Given, L. M., S. Ruecker, H. Simpson, E. B. Sadler, and A. Ruskin.. (2007). Inclusive Interface Design for Seniors: Image Browsing for a Health Information Context. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(11), 1610-1617. 10.1002/asi.20645.

9.

Goodrum, A. A.. (2000). Image Information Retrieval: An Overview of Current Research. Informing Science, 3(2), 63-66.

10.

Joho, H. and J. M. Jose. (2008). Effectiveness of Additional Representations for the Search Result Presentation on the Web. Information processing & management, 44(1), 226-241. 10.1016/j.ipm.2007.02.004.

11.

Jorgensen, C.. (2007). Image Access, the Semantic Gap, and Social Tagging as a Paradigm Shift. Advances in Classification Research Online, 18(1).

12.

Kelly, D. and C. R. Sugimoto. (2013). A Systematic Review of Interactive Information Retrieval Evaluation Studies, 1967-2006. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(4), 745-770. 10.1002/asi.22799.

13.

Lee, H. J. and D. Neal. (2010). A New Model for Semantic Photograph Description Combining Basic Levels and User-Assigned Descriptors. Journal of Information Science, 36(5), 547-565. 10.1177/0165551510374930.

14.

Liu, Y., D. Zhang, G. Lu, and W. Y. Ma. (2007). A Survey of Content-Based Image Retrieval with High-Level Semantics. Pattern Recognition, 40(1), 262-282. 10.1016/j.patcog.2006.04.045.

15.

Menard, E.. (2012). Digital Image Description: A Review of Best Practices in Cultural Heritage Institutions. Library Hi Tech, 30(2), 291-309. 10.1108/07378831211239960.

16.

Mehtre, B. M., M. S. Kankanhalli, and W. F. Lee. (1998). Content-Based Image Retrieval Using a Composite Color-Shape Approach. Information Processing & Management, 34(1), 109-120. 10.1016/S0306-4573(97)00049-6.

17.

Menard, E. (2010). Ordinary Image Retrieval in a Multilingual Context: A Comparison of Two Indexing Vocabularies. Aslib proceedings, 62(4/5), 428-437. 10.1108/00012531011074672.

18.

Menard, E.. (2011). Indexing and Retrieving Images in a Multilingual World. NASKO, 1(1), 105-106.

19.

Persson, O.. (2000). Image Indexing - A First Author Co-Citation: A Longitudinal Journal Co-Citation Analysis of An Emerging Interdisciplinary Field. Scientometrics, 41, 389-410.

20.

Petrelli, D. and P. Clough. (2012). Analysing User's Queries for Cross-Language Image Retrieval from Digital Library Collections. Electronic Library, 30(2), 197-219. 10.1108/02640471211221331.

21.

Petticrew, M. and H. Roberts. Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide.

22.

Pu, H. T.. (2005). A Comparative Analysis of Web Image and Textual Queries. Online Information Review, 29(5), 457-467. 10.1108/14684520510628864.

23.

Rasmussen, E.. (1997). Indexing Images. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 32, 169-196.

24.

Rieh, S. Y. & B. Hilligoss, Metzger, Miriam J. & Andrew J. Flanagin. eds. College Students' Credibility Judgments in the Information-Seeking Process;Digital Media, Youth, and Credibility.

25.

Tsai, C-F.. (2007). A Review of Image Retrieval Methods for Digital Cultural Heritage Resources. Online Information Review, 31(2), 185-198. 10.1108/14684520710747220.

26.

Savolainen, R.. (1995). Everyday Life Information Seeking: Approaching Information Seeking in the Context of "Way of Life". Library & information science research, 17(3), 259-294. 10.1016/0740-8188(95)90048-9.

27.

Sun, A., S. S. Bhowmick, N. Nguyen, K. Tran, and G. Bai.. (2011). Tag-Based Social Image Retrieval: An Empirical Evaluation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(12), 2364-2381. 10.1002/asi.21659.

28.

Tsai, C. F.. (2003). Stacked Generalisation: A Novel Solution to Bridge the Semantic Gap for Content-Based Image Retrieval. Online Information Review, 27(6), 442-445. 10.1108/14684520310510091.

29.

Yang, C. C.. (2004). Content-Based Image Retrieval: A Comparison between Query by Example and Image Browsing Map Approaches. Journal of information Science, 30(3), 254-267. 10.1177/0165551504044670.

30.

Yoon, J.. (2008). Searching for An Image Conveying Connotative Meanings: An Exploratory Cross-Cultural Study. Library & Information Science Research, 30(4), 312-318. 10.1016/j.lisr.2008.04.004.

31.

Yoon, J.. (2011). A Comparative Study of Methods to Explore Searchers' Affective Perceptions of Images. Information Research, 16(2).

32.

Zachary, J. and S. S. Iyengar. (2001). Information Theoretic Similarity Measures for Content Based Image Retrieval. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(10), 856-867. 10.1002/asi.1139.

Journal Of Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science

e-Submission OA Policy