바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기
 

Journal Of Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science

  • P-ISSN1229-2435
  • E-ISSN2799-4767
  • KCI

A Comparative Study on the Library and Social Cataloging: Focusing on the Cataloging Rules

Journal Of Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science / Journal Of Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, (P)1229-2435; (E)2799-4767
2015, v.26 no.4, pp.221-244
https://doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2015.26.4.221
Baek, Ji-Won

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to investigate the current and overall situation of cataloging ecosystem focusing on the interrelationship between traditional library and social cataloging site cataloging. For this, an extensive research and analysis was conducted concerning comparative analysis on cataloging rules of the library and social cataloging. As a result, not only the similarity and difference but also interrelationship between library and social cataloging was analyzed in detail. In addition, the characteristics of the cataloging rules were analyzed by the stage of cataloging in the library and the social cataloging environment. This study provides implications for mutual understanding and cooperation between library and social cataloging. The result may have significant meaning in prospecting cataloging ecosystem and planning further study on facilitating interaction and leading knowledge organization development.

keywords
도서관 목록, 목록 규칙, 소셜 목록, 사회적 목록

Reference

1.

김정현. (2013). 한국목록규칙의 개정 방향에 대한 연구. 한국도서관.정보학회지, 44(4), 123-143.

2.

박진희. (2009). RDA의 제정동향 및 내용구조에 관한 연구. 한국도서관.정보학회지, 40(1), 317-338.

3.

박진희. (2009). RDA와 KCR4의 기술규칙 분석에 관한 연구. 한국도서관.정보학회지, 40(2), 111-138.

4.

안서현, 이창수. (2014). 목록규칙에 있어 개인의 속성과 관계의 기술에 관한 연구. 한국비블리아학회지, 25(3), 235-261.

5.

이경호. (2012). RDA에 나타난 이용자 과업에 대한 연구. 한국도서관.정보학회지, 43(1), 99-122.

6.

이미화. (2011). AACR2에서 RDA로 목록규칙 변화에 따른 KCR4의 고려사항에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 28(1), 23-42.

7.

이미화. (2011). RDA 자원유형의 KCR4 적용에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 28(3), 103-121.

8.

이미화. (2012). 국제목록원칙 2009 제정에 따른 한국목록규칙의 방향성에 관한 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 46(2), 261-280.

9.

이미화, 현문수. (2015). RDA 테스트 분석을 통해 본 한국목록규칙의 테스트 방안에 관한 연구. 한국도서관.정보학회지, 46(1), 155-176.

10.

이성숙. (2008). 대학도서관 폭소노미 태그의 형태적 특성에 관한 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 42(4), 463-480.

11.

American Library Association & Joint Steering Committee for Development of RDA. RDA: Resource Description & Access.

12.

Goodreads. Books with multiple authors.

13.

Goodreads. About Goodreads Librarians.

14.

Harej, Viktor and Maja Zumer. (2013). Analysis of FRBR user tasks. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 51(7), 741-759. 10.1080/01639374.2013.785461.

15.

Librarything. HelpThing:Work/Relationships.

16.

Hider, Philip and Ying-Hsang Liu. (2013). The Use of RDA elements in support of FRBR user tasks. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 51(8), 857-872. 10.1080/01639374.2013.825827.

17.

Joseph, Deodato. (2014). The patron as producer: libraries, web 2.0, and participatory culture. Journal of Documentation, 70(5), 734-758. 10.1108/JD-10-2012-0127.

18.

Librarything. Common Knowledge. "Formatting rules and usage guidelines.

19.

Librarything. LibraryThing gets work-to-work relationships!.

20.

Librarything. WikiThing.

21.

Primary Research Group. The survey of academic library cataloging practices. 2013 Edition.

22.

RDA Committee of Principals. RDA Governance Review. A discussion document.

23.

Spalding, Tim. Is your OPAC fun?.

24.

Spalding, Tim. Common Knowledge: Rules!.

25.

Spalding, Tim. Common Knowledge: Names, Relationships and Events.

26.

Spanhoff, Elisabeth de Rijk. (2002). Principle issues: catalog paradigms, old and new. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 35(1/2), 37-59. 10.1300/J104v35n01_04.

27.

Svenonius, Elaine. The intellectual foundation of information organization.

28.

Taniguchia, Shoichi. (2013). User tasks in the RDA-based model. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 51(7), 788-815. 10.1080/01639374.2013.800623.

Journal Of Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science