바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기
 

Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society

  • P-ISSN2466-2542
  • KCI

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.30 No.1

PDF Citation Share

A study on the description of bibliographic records on the Internet Resources

Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society / Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, (P)2466-2542;
1999, v.30 no.1, pp.219-241
Lee Myoung-Gyu
Lee, M. (1999). A study on the description of bibliographic records on the Internet Resources. , 30(1), 219-241.

Abstract

For an efficient access to Internet resources, these resources need to be organized systematically for accessibility. and their cataloging technique has been developing. Consequently, after I compared and analyzed OCLC manual applying AACR2 techniques and procedures, with Dublin core metadata used for cataloging Internet resources, I examined their mapping into MARC format. Dublin core metadata elements should be transformed to MARC format fields. In methodology of integration into different types of the metadata, an update of MARC format and its new field should be provided. Especially, Internet resources cataloging experts familiar with these technology will be really wanted nowadays.

keywords

Reference

1.

Shieh, Jackie. (1996). Does it really matter? The cataloging format, the sequential order of note fields, and the specific of field 856 . Proceedings of the OCLC internet cataloging colloquium-field reports.

2.

Weibel, S.. .

3.

Calan, Priscilla;Guenther, Rebecca. (1996). Metadata for Internet Resources : The Dublin Core Metadata Elements set and its mapping to USMARC. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 22(3/4), 43-58.

4.

Sha, Vianne T.. (1995). Cataloguing internet resources : The library approach. Electronic Library, 13(5), 467-476.

5.

Cassel, Richard. (1995). Selection Criteria for Internet Resources. College & Research Libraries News, .

6.

Michelson, A.. Why a CNI white paper Framing the problem.

7.

Cromwell, Willy. (1994). The Core Record : A New Bibliographic Standard. LRTS, 38(4), 415-424.

8.

문헌정보처리연구회(편). .

9.

Lynch, C.. Identifiable issues and the remaining research questions.

10.

김태수. (1998). 메타데이터의 변환과 자원기술구조의 연구. 정보관리학회지, 15(3), 95-112.

11.

Library of Congress. .

12.

Weibel, S.. (1995). Metadata : The foundations of resource description. D-lib Magazine, .

13.

Younger, Jennifer A.. (1997). Resources Description in the Digital Age. Library Trends, 45(3), 462-481.

14.

ALA. .

15.

Johnson, Peggy;B. MacEwan(ed.). .

16.

Olson, Nancy B.. .

17.

Gorman, M.. (1984). Report on the Technical Services Directors of Large Research Libraries Survey of Minimal-level Cataloguing. Information Technology and Libraries, 3(4), 382-384.

18.

Ercegovac, Zorana. (1998). Minimal Level Cataloging : What Does It mean for Maps in the Contexts of Card Catalogs, Online Catalogs, and Digital Libraries. JASIS, 49(8), 706-719.

19.

O'Neill, Edward. (1997). Characteristics of Web Accessible Information . 63rd. Conference Programme and Proceedings.

20.

Xu, Amanda. (1996). Accessing information on the internet : Feasibility study of USMARC format and AACR2 . Proceedings of the OCLC internet cataloging colloquium-field reports.

21.

Computer Files.

22.

Oddy, Pat. .

23.

Horny, Karen L.. (1986). Minimal-level cataloging : A Look at the issues-A symposium. The Journal of academic librarianship, 11(6), 332-342.

24.

Dillon, Martin(et al.). .

25.

Library of Congress; Network Development and MARC Standards Office. .

26.

IFLA. Functional requirements for bibliographic records.

27.

Olson, Nancy B.. .

Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society

e-Submission OA Policy