바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기
 

Journal Of Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science

  • P-ISSN1229-2435
  • E-ISSN2799-4767
  • KCI

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.27 No.1

PDF Citation Share

A Comparative Analysis on Cardiovascular Research in Korea and the United States

Journal Of Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science / Journal Of Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, (P)1229-2435; (E)2799-4767
2016, v.27 no.1, pp.111-134
https://doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2016.27.1.111
Lim, Ji Young
Chung, EunKyung
Lim,, J. Y. , & Chung,, E. (2016). A Comparative Analysis on Cardiovascular Research in Korea and the United States. , 27(1), 111-134, https://doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2016.27.1.111

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate and compare the intellectual structure of cardiovascular research area in Korea and the United States. For the purpose of this study, a data set was collected; one journal Korean Circulation Journal is in Korea and two journals Circulation, and Circulation Research are in the United States. Based on the frequency of citation counts, 45 authors and 53 authors were selected for author co-citation analysis. By multidimensional scaling, clustering, and factor analyses, the results demonstrate that researchers in both countries commonly tend to work on several, rather than focus on certain sub-areas. In both countries, the core areas are revealed as 'cardiovascular disease treatment', 'cardiovascular disease diagnose', 'cardiovascular disease fundamentals', and 'cardiovascular disease preventives'. One of distinctive differences between two is that research in Korea is likely to focus on clinical medicines while research in the United States tends to be on fundamental medicines. While the area of 'Disorders of Rhythm' is revealed in Korea, 'Pharmacology of the Cardiovascular System' area is found in the United States. In addition, the sub-areas of fundamental medicines such as 'Epidemiology of Cardiovascular Disease', 'Biology', 'Biochemistry', 'Physiology' are revealed distinctively in the United States.

keywords
계량정보분석, 지적구조, 심장혈관학, 의학, 저자동시인용분석, 다차원척도법, 군집분석, 요인분석

Reference

1.

장혜란, 강길원, 이은정, 김승렬, 이영성. (2012). 암유전자 연구주제 네트워크 분석. 기술혁신학회지, 15(2), 369-399.

2.

정민수, 정동준. (2008). 국내 예방의학 분야의 공저자․핵심어 네트워크와 군집 양상 - 대한예방의학회지(1991∼2006) 게재논문의 분석. 예방의학회지, 41(1), 1-9.

3.

조현양. (2012). 국내 수의과학 분야의 지적구조 분석에 관한 연구. 정보관리연구, 43(2), 43-66.

4.

통계청. 2014년 사망원인통계.

5.

허고은, 송민. (2013). 저자동시인용 분석과 동시출현단어 분석을 이용한 의료 정보학 저널의 지적구조 분석. 정보관리학회지, 30(2), 207-225.

6.

Chen, L. C. and Y. H. Lien. (2011). Using author co-citation analysis to examine the intellectual structure of e-learning: A MIS perspective. Scientometrics, 89(3), 867-886. 10.1007/s11192-011-0458-y.

7.

Garcia-Lillo, F., M. Ubeda-Garcia, and B. Marco-Lajara. (2016). The intellectual structure of research in hospitality management: A literature review using bibliometric methods of the journal international journal of hospitality management. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 52, 121-130. 10.1016/j.ijhm.2015.10.007.

8.

Hyun, Y. S., D. Cho, and S. W. Yoon. (2015). Landscape of human resource development research in Korea: results from author co-citation network analysis. Human Resource Development International, 18(5), 446-463. 10.1080/13678868.2015.1079295.

9.

김재욱, 김향미, 이소영, 이진화. (2008). 저자 동시 인용 분석을 통한 "관계 마케팅" 연구 동향 및 지적구조 규명에 관한 연구. 마케팅연구, 23(3), 1-35.

10.

김희정. (2005). 저자 동시인용분석에 의한 국내외 기록관리학 분야의 지적구조 비교에 관한 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 39(3), 207-224.

11.

서은경. (1992). 정보검색분야의 지적구조와 변화에 관한 연구: 영어문화권 저자들을 중심으로. 정보관리학회지, 9(1), 55-82.

12.

세계보건기구(World Health Organzation). The 10 leading causes of death in the world, 2000 and 2012 [online].

13.

이재윤. (2007). 지적구조 분석을 위한 MDS지도 작성 방식의 비교 분석. 한국문헌정보학회지, 41(2), 335-357.

14.

White, H. D. and B. C. Griffith. (1981). Author Cocitation: A literature measure of intellectural structure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 32(3), 163-172. 10.1002/asi.4630320302.

15.

Jarneving, B.. (2001). The cognitive structure of current cardiovascular research. Scientometrics, 50(3), 365-389. 10.1023/A:1010546312154.

16.

Liang, H. N.. (2010). Overview of the Health Informatics research field: A bibliometric approach. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, 335, 37-48. 10.1007/978-3-642-15515-4_5.

17.

McCain, K. W.. (1984). Longitudinal author cocitation mapping: The changing structure of macroeconomics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 35(6), 351-359. 10.1002/asi.4630350607.

18.

Persson, O., R. Danell, and J. Wiborg Schneider;ed. F. Astrom, R. Danell, B. Larsen, J. Schneider. How to use Bibexcel for various types of bibliometric analysis. In Celebrating scholarly communication studies: A Festschrift for Olle Persson at his 60th Birthday.

19.

Thomson Reuters. JCR Science Edition [online].

20.

White, H. D. and McCain, K. W.. (1998). Visualizing a Discipline: An Author Co-Citation Analysis of Information Science, 1972-1995. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(4), 327-355.

Journal Of Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science

e-Submission OA Policy