- P-ISSN 2671-8197
- E-ISSN 2733-936X
This paper begins with the idea that Chasabonpuri and Jimgajaegut take the same pattern, as suggested in the previous study. The paper aims to prove that still there are differences between them as well as similarities digging more into the contents of Chasabonpuri. There is a need to positively examine the differences, as they are not local ones such as names and places. To this end, the body of this article scrutinizes the common narrative structure by identifying types of materials of Chasabonpuri and comparing different versions and compares with Jimgajaegut, to explain differences and similarities of the two shaman songs as well as underlying reasons. The differences can be discussed in three aspects: firstly, there is another conflict or encounter structure which does not appear in Jimgajaegut. In Chasabonpuri, the episodes of Jimgajaegut and king of this life Kimchiwon are added. Secondly, Chasabonpuri is unique in the sense that the song has strong nature as Bonpuri. Generally speaking, if it is not a coincidence that Bonpuri has developed in a systematic and diversely, compared to other regions, it is assumed that these characteristics unique to Jeju Island were reflected in the course of forming Chasabonpuri. Thirdly, Not only reciting a narrative shaman song, but also actual performance of certain parts of the song consist Chasabonpuri, hinting at the close relation between myth and ritual. Such a close connection between shaman songs and rituals is another characteristic of the shaman practice of Jeju Island. Consequently, if characteristics of the Jejudogut are condensed by Chasabonpuri, then conversely, we may assume that Chasabonpuri has developed, reflecting characteristics of the Jejudogut. In conclusion, Chasabonpuri and Jimgajaegut are shaman songs, which are same and different in some aspects; they have some narratives in common, while having unique ones at the same time. In addition, the purpose is important for a shaman song. Whereas Chasabonpuri is to banish the messenger that takes a dead soul to the underworld, Jimgajaegut aims at Aengmageum in light of naming methods and contents of the song. The connection of the Jeju gut with shaman songs and rituals shows its systematic nature. It can be said that there are episodes of same type, while their regional features appear to be different from Chasabonpuri and Jimgajaegut.
권태효, (2006) 인간 죽음의 기원, 그 신화적 전개양상, 한국민속학
김태곤, (1978) 한국무가집 3, 집문당
김화경, (1993) 차사본풀이? 구조의 분석?, 인문연구
김헌선, (1994) 인세차지경쟁 신화소의 전승과 변이, 길벗
김헌선, (2005) 제주도 <지장본풀이>의 가창방식, 신화적 의미, 제의적 성격 연구-특히 『시왕맞이』의 <지장본풀이>를 예증삼아-, 한국무속학
김형근, (2006) 동해안 오귀굿 구조의 현장론적 연구,
문무병, (1998) 제주도 무속신화:열두본풀이 자료집, 칠머리당굿보존회
문무병, (2001) 1994년 동김념 중당클 큰굿 자료집, 제주전통문화연구소
문창헌, (1994) 風俗巫音(祝祀文), 제주대학교탐라문화연구소
박종성, (1999) 창세서사시 변이 전승과 시대적 변천, 태학사
서대석, (1968) 서사무가연구-설화ㆍ소설과의 관계를 중심으로,
안병국, (2003) 저승설화연구, 우리문학회
임석재, (1965) 중요무형문화재조사보고서(13): 관북지방무가, 문화재관리국
장주근, (2001) 무속과 서사무가, 열락
장희철, (2004) 차사본풀이 연구,
전경욱, (1999) 함경도의 민속, 고려대학교출판부
진성기, (1968) 남국의 무가, 제주민속문화연구소
진성기, (1991) 제주도무가본풀이사전, 민속원
최원오, (1997) <차사본풀이> 유형 무가의 구조와 의미, 한국민속학
황루시, (1995) 임석재론, 구비문학연구
현용준, (1980) 제주도신화, 서문당
현용준, (1980) 제주도무속자료사전, 신구문화사
현용준, (1980) 한국구비문학대계(9-2):제주시편, 한국정신문화연구원
현용준, (1996) 고려대 한국고전문학전집(29):제주도무가, 고려대학교민족문화연구소
赤松智城ㆍ, (1991) 조선무속의 연구, 동문선