- P-ISSN 2671-8197
- E-ISSN 2733-936X
A rumor in the late Joseon Korea was a kind of means of the resistance. A circulation of misinformation or frivolous stories was regarded as a rumor. Posting seditious letters in the public marketplace or on gates was also a media of rumors. These kind of rumors were frequently used as a powerful propaganda by rebels. Rumors at that time were often originated from the Record of Jeonggam(a book of prognostications). Therefore, when rebels tried to gain people’s support for their planed rebellion, the book was essential. The Musin Rebellion of 1728 in the reign of King Yeongjo was a representative upheaval initiated by a rumor from the late Joseon period. After the rebellion was subjugated, so called ‘the Musin remnants’ continued to spread rumors. Therefore the government accused any rumor mongers of being part of the Musin remnants. In the late Joseon Korea, especially in the 18th century, a lot of decayed nobilities were found among the list of rumor mongers. Even though they had a profound Neo Confucian knowledge, they could not posses any political and economic foundations. Along with Neo Confucian grounding, they also had an extensive understandings of popular thoughts like the Record of Jeonggam. They traveled all around the country and worked as a teacher, doctor, or geomancer. They could lead public opinion by spreading rumors which were originated from the Record of Jeonggam. The Joseon government tried to prohibit the record of Jeonggam from a circulation to prevent a political revolt it could cause. King’s vassals constantly requested the King to ban the book and, therefore, the King directed his people to cultivate their Confucian morals with diligence. Rumors tend to exaggerate the negative aspect of the society and it actually caused a considerable damages. However, rumors in the late Joseon Korea provided people with ways to express their suppressed feelings. The rumor mongers sometimes requested the political, social and economic changes of the Kingdom. They politically pursued an ideal governance by rebellions, and the equality of the people socially. Economic reform was also suggested. The arguments of the rebels including rumors were unscientific and unrealistic, but it played a significant role for the growth of the popular consciousness.
大明律.
備邊司謄錄.
純祖實錄.
承政院日記.
英祖實錄.
正祖實錄.
推案及鞫案.
김강일, 「조선 후기 왜관의 운영실태에 관한 연구」. 강원대학교 박사학위논문, 2012.
김대길, 조선 후기 장시연구. 국학자료원, 1997.
고성훈, 「조선 후기 변란 연구」. 동국대학교 박사학위논문, 1993.
고성훈, 「조선 후기 ‘해도기병설’ 관련 변란의 추이와 성격」. 조선시대사학보 3, 조선시대사학회, 1997.
고성훈, 「1819년 화성 괘서 사건의 추이와 성격」. 수원문화사연구 2, 수원문화원,1998.
배항섭, 「19세기 후반 ‘변란’의 추이와 성격」. 1894년 농민전쟁연구 2 18·19세기의농민항쟁, 역사비평사, 1992.
오수창, 「조선 후기 평안도 농민에 대한 인사정책과 도민의 정치적 동향」. 서울대학교박사학위논문, 1996.
이상배, 조선 후기 정치와 괘서. 국학자료원, 1999.
이상배, 한국 중·근세 정치사회사. 경인문화사, 2003.
장영민, 「유랑지식인과 사회변혁운동」. 정신문화연구 제20권 4호(통권 69호), 1997.
정석종, 조선 후기 사회변동 연구. 일조각, 1983.
정순우, 「조선 후기 유랑지식인 형성의 사회문화적 배경」. 정신문화연구 제20권4호(통권 69호), 1997.
최종성, 「무당에게 제사 받은 생불 요승처경추안을 중심으로」. 역사민속학 40,역사민속학회, 2012.
황선명, 조선조종교사회사연구. 일지사, 1985.