logo

  • KOREAN
  • P-ISSN2671-8197
  • E-ISSN2733-936X
  • KCI

Article Detail

Home > Article Detail
  • P-ISSN 2671-8197
  • E-ISSN 2733-936X

A Study on the Creation Background of ‘Ui‒san‒moon‒dap’(<醫山問答>)

Korean Studies Quarterly / Korean Studies Quarterly, (P)2671-8197; (E)2733-936X
2013, v.36 no.3, pp.226-248
https://doi.org/10.25024/ksq.36.3.201309.226
Kim, Dong-geon
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

Sil‒ong(實翁) is Hong Dae‒yong himself in his latter years, as well as was created based on various characters such as a bonze performance of Mount Ui‒moo‒ryeo, a Western missionary of a church in Beijing and Kim Sin‒gyeom whose pen name is teacher Jeung‒so(橧巢先生). In addition, Heoja(虛子) is also Hong Dae‒yong when he was conducted away and is founded on Lee Ki‒ji who is the writer of ‘Il‒am‒yeon‒gi’. Naturally, Heoja also indicates the people ostracized by existing Neo‒Confucianism, the theories of Ui‒lee(loyalty), Hwa‒ui(negotiations for peace) and Book‒beol(expedition to conquer the north) and so on. It is highly possible for ‘Ui‒san‒moon‒dap’ to have started from the disappointment in the failure of the purpose that Daeyong Hong had planned at first. Although it resulted in the great change in the aspect of a writers exchange after he was hauled in, Chinese scholars were not the targets to meet from the beginning. Moreover, Hong Dae‒yong built Nong‒soo‒gak, a private observatory, by producing a wide range of astronomical machines before he was conducted away. The meaning of his shock through the experi‒ence should be reconsidered, if it is fully reflected on. The setting place and time of ‘Ui‒san‒moon‒dap’ and the contrast between Heo‒ja and Sil‒ong existed in embryo in the tradition of amusement and record(遊記) compromised with Yoen‒haeng‒rok and applied to ‘Ui‒san‒moon‒dap’ by emulating the change of consciousness appeared in ‘Il‒am‒yeon‒gi’ written by Gi‒ji Lee. ‘Ui‒san‒moon‒dap’ is a different type of writing from the social intercourse with Chinese writers who thrilled scholars of the time. However, it seems to have been difficult to persuade the fact that the earth orbits around the sun. It can be seen with ‘Every one who heard it laughed at it’(聞者莫不笑之). In other words, ‘Ui‒san‒moon‒dap’ was written for trying to demonstrate the fact that the earth orbits with a variety of theories causing Ji‒jeon‒seol(地轉說: the theory that the earth revolves once a day). Furthermore, it shows the intention to rectify the academic situation of the time which had been headed for a downfall.

keywords
홍대용, <의산문답>, 연행록의 전통, 실옹, 허자, Hong Dae‒yong, Ui‒san‒moon‒dap, Tradition of Yeon‒haeng‒rok, Sil‒ong, Heoja


Reference

1

金景善, 『燕轅直指』(『연행록전집』 71, 동국대학교 출판부, 2001).

2

金昌業, 『老稼齋燕行日記』(『연행록전집』 32‒33, 동국대학교 출판부, 2001).

3

李器之, 『一庵燕記』(『연행록선집보유』 上, 동아시아학술원 대동문화연구원, 2008).

4

李魯春, 『북연긔행』(숭실대학교 한국기독교박물관 소장본).

5

李德懋, 『入燕記』(『연행록전집』 57, 동국대학교 출판부, 2001).

6

李廷龜, 『月沙集』(한국문집총간 70, 민족문화추진회, 1990).

7

朴趾源, 『燕巖集』(한국문집총간 252, 민족문화추진회, 1990).

8

嚴璹, 『燕行錄』(『연행록전집』 40, 동국대학교 출판부, 2001)

9

洪大容, 『湛軒書』(한국문집총간 248, 민족문화추진회, 2000).

10

유혜자, 『乙丙燕行錄』(『연행록전집』 43‒48, 동국대학교 출판부, 2001).

11

方回 選評, 『瀛奎律髓』. 上海古籍出版社, 2005.

12

강명관, 「조선 후기 서적의 수입·유통과 장서가의 출현 – 18·19세기 京華世族」. 『민족문학사연구』 9집, 1996.

13

김남기, 「김신겸의 「百六哀吟」에 대하여」. 『한국한문학연구』 22집, 1998.

14

김동건, 「『일암연기』에 나타난 글쓰기 방식」. 『민족문화』 40집, 2012.

15

김상혁, 『송이영의 혼천시계』. 한국학술정보, 2012.

16

김명호, 「연암의 우정론과 西學의 영향 ‒ 마테오 리치의 『交友論』을 중심으로」. 『고전문학연구』 40집, 2011.

17

박수밀, 「‘사이’의 미학과 그 의미」. 『18세기 지식인의 생각과 글쓰기 전략』, 태학사, 2007.

18

박현규, 「豊潤 高麗鋪村의 유래 고찰」. 『한국실학연구』 20집, 2010.

19

박희병, 『범애와 평등』. 돌베개, 2013.

20

우지영, 「문답식 산문의 창작 전통에서 고찰한 홍대용의 <의산문답>」. 『동방한문학』 52집, 2012.

21

이종묵, 『조선의 문화공간』 4권. 휴머니스트, 2006.

22

주우진, 「홍대용의 『연기』와 『을병연행록』 비교 연구」. 한국학대학원 석사학위논문, 2009.

23

천금매, 「18‒19세기 朝·淸문인 교류척독 연구」. 연세대학교 박사학위논문, 2011.

24

한영호, 「농수각 천문시계」, 『역사학보』 177집, 2003.

25

祁慶福·郭平, 「清代朝鮮使臣與醫巫閭山」. 『韓國學論文集』, 遼寧民族出版社, 2009.

26

謝景泉, 「醫巫閭山名稱考釋」. 『錦州師範學院學報』 21卷, 1999.

상단으로 이동

Korean Studies Quarterly