.jpg){kind=logo}
- P-ISSN 2671-8197
- E-ISSN 2733-936X
- KOREAN
- P-ISSN2671-8197
- E-ISSN2733-936X
- KCI
Article Detail
Home > Article Detail
Overcoming Dichotomous Views on Disability through Social Discourse
Korean Studies Quarterly / Korean Studies Quarterly, (P)2671-8197; (E)2733-936X
2014, v.37 no.4, pp.163-190
https://doi.org/10.25024/ksq.37.4.201412.163
(2014). Overcoming Dichotomous Views on Disability through Social Discourse. , 37(4), 163-190, https://doi.org/10.25024/ksq.37.4.201412.163
- Downloaded
- Viewed
Abstract
This paper deals with the social discourse on disability based on dichotomous views and tries to show a new way of thinking. It is generally understood that the disability is the cause of inequality and discrimination of the disabled people. But inequality and discrimination of the disabled people arise not out of the disability itself, but it is connected with social consciousness. This Paper is to trace back to the civilizations of ancient Greece and Rome, middle age and modern western society in order to disclose that the social discourse of disability based on dichotomous views was the cause of inequality and discrimination of the disabled people. If we look back at history of western Philosophy since Plato, we can find It that dichotomous views exert strongly its influence on the mainstream of western philosophy. As G. Deleuze and M. Foucault criticized sharply, dichotomous views that divided perfection and imperfection, equality and inequality, normal and abnormal could be easily connected with conceptions of discrimination. On a basis of this dichotomous views, social prejudice of disability was formed and it permeated through all society. As a result, people take it for granted that disability is discriminated and excluded from society. As Nora Ellen Groce says, disability is a social construct. The main cause of discrimination and exclusion of disability is not connected with disability itself, but social prejudice based on dichotomous views. To overcome discrimination of disability, to change social prejudice of disability, this paper refered to ancient chinese Philosopher Chuang ‒ntzu who criticised the dichotomous ways of thinking and views. He showed whole dimension of Dao. In it we find a new way of thinking and view on disability.
- keywords
- 장애, 플라톤, 들뢰즈, 푸코, 장자, 이분법적 시선, 장애에 대한 사회적 담론, 완전/불완전, 정상/비정상, 사회적 가공구조물, disability, Plato, Deleuze, Foucault, Chuang‒htzu, dichotomous way of thinking, social discourse of disability, perfection and imperfection, normal and abnormal, a social construct
Reference
1
김도현, 당신은 장애를 아는가 . 메이데이, 2007.
2
김도현, 장애학 함께 읽기 . 그린비, 2009.
3
박수경, 장애의 사회적 의미와 사회통합 . 집문당, 2008.
4
유동철, 인권 관점에서 보는 장애인 복지 . 집문당, 2009.
5
이동희, 세상에서 가장 흥미로운 철학이야기 근현대편. 휴머니스트, 2011.
6
정창권, 역사 속 장애인은 어떻게 살았을까 . 글항아리, 2011.
7
陳鼓應 譯註, 莊子今註今譯 . 臺灣商務印書館, 1981.
8
Barnes, Colin, “억압의 유산: 서구 문화에서 장애의 역사”: Len Barton & M. Oliver, Disability Studies: Past, Present and Future. Leeds University Press, 1997(윤삼호 역, 장애학: 과거·현재·미래 . 대구장애인연맹, 2006).
9
Bentham, J., An Introdution to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. London; The Athlone Press, 1970a.
10
Bentham, J., Panopticon. Paris, 1970b(신건수 역, 파놉티콘 . 책세상, 2010).
11
Charton, James I., Nothing about us without us. University of California, 1998(전지혜, 우리 없이 우리에 대한 것은 없다 . 울력, 2009).
12
Deleuze, G., Différence et répétition. Presses Univeritaires de France, 1968(김상환 역, 차이와 반복 , 민음사, 2004).
13
Foucault, Michel., Historie de la folie à l’âge classique. Paris, Gallimard, 1972(김부용 역, 광기의 역사 . 인간사랑, 1999).
14
Foucault, Michel., Histoire de la sexualité. vol. 1: La volonté de savoir, Paris, Gallimard, 1976(이규현 역, 성의 역사 1 . 나남, 1990).
15
Foucault, Michel., Histoire de la sexualité. vol. 2: L’usage des plaisirs, Paris, Gallimard, 1984a(문경자·신은영 역, 성의 역사 2 . 나남, 1990).
16
Foucault, Michel., Histoire de la sexualité. vol. 3: Le souci de soi, Paris, Gallimard, 1984b(이혜숙·이영목 역, 성의 역사 3 . 나남, 1990).
17
Groce, Nora Ellen, Everyone here spoke sign language . Harvard University, Press, 1985(박승희 역, 마서즈 비니어드 사람들은 수화로 말한다 . 한길사, 2003).
18
Jollien, Alexandre, Éloge de la faiblesse. Le Cerf, 1999(이충민 역, 약자의 찬가 . 새물결, 2005).
19
Kant, Immanuel, Beantwortung der Frage: Was ist Aufklärung? In: Berlinische Monatsschrift, 1784, H. 12, pp. 481‒494.
20
Platon, Politeia, J. Burnet(ed.), Platonis Opera, 1902(박종현 역, 국가 . 서광사, 1997).
21
Plutarch, The Lives of the Noble Grecians and Romans. Dryden, 1952(김병철 역, 플루타르크 영웅전 . 범우사, 1999).
22
Ralston, D. Christopher and Justin Ho, Philosophical Reflections on Disability. Springer, 2011.
23
Stiker, Henri‒Jaques, Corps infirmes et sociétés, Paris: Aubier Montaigne. 1982.
24
Talle, Aud., “아이는 아이일 뿐이다”. Ingstad, Benedicte·Whyte, Susan Reynolds(ed.), Disability and Culture . The Regents of the University of California, 1995(김도현 역, 우리가 아는 장애는 없다 . 그린비, 2011).
25
Thomas, K., The Place of Laughter in Tudor and Stuart England. Times Literary Supplement 21 January, pp. 77‒81, 1977.
26
Tremain, Shelly(ed.), Foucault and the Government of Disability(Corporealities: Discourses of Disability). the university of Michigan Press, 2005.
27
Wilkinson, Richard G., The Impact of Inequality. Routledge, 2005(김흥수 영역, 평등해야 건강하다: 불평등은 어떻게 사회를 병들게 하는가 . 후마니타스, 2008).
Other articles from this issue
- Current Status of Research and Tasks on the Names of Costume
- Current Status of Research and Tasks on the Names of Korean Dishes
- Current Status of Research and Tasks on the Names of Plant
- Current Status of Research and Tasks on Traditional ‘Hyangyak’ Terminology
- The Religious Identities and Practices of the Cheontae Order in Korea
- Overcoming Dichotomous Views on Disability through Social Discourse
- A Study on Differing Perception of Charging croup through the Embodiment of Positive Patriarch in the Korean Classical Novel
- A Study on the Descent of Tejaprabha Buddha in Museum of FineArt, Boston
- A Study on the Characteristics of Yeowa(餘窩) Mok Man‐jung’s(睦萬中) Poems in His Old Age: Focusing on Yeoksarok
- Kim Ku’s Theory of Ethical Culture State and Liberalism
- ‘Becoming Colonized Person’ As a Tool of Approaching ‘Universal’
- Individuality and Collectivity Represented in Megalithic and Non‒megalithic Burials in the Korean Early to Middle Bronze Age Hoseo Region
- more
Recommanded Articles
This website recommended the use the Chrome browser for journal website.