.jpg){kind=logo}
- P-ISSN 2671-8197
- E-ISSN 2733-936X
- KOREAN
- P-ISSN2671-8197
- E-ISSN2733-936X
- KCI
Article Detail
Home > Article Detail
A Study on the Relationship between Mencius’ Gi Theory and Yulgok Neo‒confucianism
Korean Studies Quarterly / Korean Studies Quarterly, (P)2671-8197; (E)2733-936X
2022, v.45 no.4, pp.259-290
https://doi.org/10.25024/ksq.45.4.202212.259
Anyookyung,
(2022). A Study on the Relationship between Mencius’ Gi Theory and Yulgok Neo‒confucianism. , 45(4), 259-290, https://doi.org/10.25024/ksq.45.4.202212.259
- Downloaded
- Viewed
Abstract
This paper is aimed at analyzing the meaning and role of ki in Yulgok’s neo‒confucianism, and to consider how it is connected to the Mengzhi’s the theory of Gi. Yulgok emphasizes the clear and clean Gi like Mencius’s Hoyeonjigi, which appears as Simsigi, Bonyeonjigi, Damilcheongheojigi, and Damyeoncheongheojigi. In this process, just as Mencius used Hoyeonjigi as the theoretical basis for his theory of nature goodness, Yulgok also uses Bonyeonjigi, Damilcheongheojigi, and Damyeoncheongheojigi as the theoretical basis for his GivalliSeungildo or Shimsigi. In addition, just as Mencius distinguished the clear and clean Hoyeongi from the murky hyeolgi, Yulgok also clearly distinguishes the clear and clean Damilcheongheojigi from the murky Jobakoeshinjigi. In this way, it can be seen that Mencius’s Gi theory was accepted as the neo-confucianism of Yulgok and systematized theoretically.
- keywords
- Mengzhi, Hoyeonjigi, Yulgok, Bonyeonjigi, Damilcheongheojigi, 맹자, 호연지기, 율곡, 본연지기, 담일청허지기
Reference
1
『栗谷全書』,
2
『退溪全書』,
3
『孟子』,
4
『孟子集註』,
5
『大學』,
6
『大學章句』,
7
『中庸』,
8
『中庸章句』.
9
민족문화추진회, 『국역 율곡집』. 서울: 솔, 1997.
10
김형찬, ｢기질변화, 욕망의 정화를 위한 성리학적 기획: 율곡 이이의 심성수양론을 중심으로｣. 『철학연구』 38, 2009, 189~211쪽.
11
박창용, ｢율곡 이기론의 기중시적 특성｣. 『동원논집』 14, 2001, 41~64쪽.
12
신순정, ｢율곡의 理氣之妙와 致中和: 기질변화의 도덕교육적 함의를 중심으로｣. 『한국철학논집』 50, 2016, 9~36쪽.
13
안영석, ｢심학의 관점으로 본 율곡의 성리설과 수양공부론｣. 『유학연구』 37, 2016, 61~90쪽.
14
이종미, ｢율곡 성리학 체계에 있어 기의 역할｣. 성균관대학교 석사학위논문, 2012.
15
이종미, ｢화담･퇴계･율곡 성리학 체계에 있어 ‘기’ 인식의 비교 연구｣. 『철학논총』94, 2018, 307~327쪽.
16
이종미, ｢율곡･외암･녹문의 성리학 체계에 있어 ‘기’의 역할과 위상에 관한 연구｣. 성균관대학교 박사학위논문, 2020.
17
이해영, ｢율곡 이기론의 기중시적 특성: 주자의 이기관과 관련하여｣. 『동양철학연구』 5, 1984, 39~58쪽.
Other articles from this issue
- A Study on Diplomacy with China in the Joseon Dynasty and Utilization on Jeongmoon(呈文)
- A Study on the Names of Jang: Focusing on Onsite Dialects and Literary Materials
- A Study on the Relevance between the Calligraphic Styles of Gentry Men’s Correspondence Written in Chinese Characters and Hangeul in the Joseon Dynasty: Focused on the Correspondence Written by Kim Seong‒il, Song Si‒yeol, and Kim Jeong‒hui
- Trial Review of an Independent Army in South Manchuria: Lee Jin-moo with a Case in Mind
- A Study on the Establishment and Diplomatic Activities of the Embassy of the Republic of Korea in the USA from 1949 to 1950
- A Study on the Change of T’oegye Yi Hwang’s Interpretations on ‘That which has no Pole and yet (itself) the Supreme Pole(無極而太極)’
- A Study on the Relationship between Mencius’ Gi Theory and Yulgok Neo‒confucianism
- more
Recommanded Articles
This website recommended the use the Chrome browser for journal website.